Did you wonder about the "Mac vs. PC" question asked at the Rock the Vote "debate"? Check out this article.
-snip-
NEW YORK -- CNN planted a question about computer preferences at last week's debate of the Democratic presidential candidates at Faneuil Hall in Boston, according to the student who posed the query and wrote about it yesterday in an online forum of the Brown (University) Daily Herald. During the debate, cosponsored by the nonprofit Rock the Vote organization, Alexandra Trustman asked the candidates whether they preferred the PC or Mac format for their computers.
Trustman wrote yesterday that she was called the morning of the debate and given the topic of the question the CNN producers wanted her to ask. She wrote that she was "confused by the question's relevance" and constructed what she thought was a "much more relevant" question.
But when she arrived in Boston for the debate, she wrote, she was "handed a note card" with the question and told she couldn't ask her alternative "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions."
CNN did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
-/snip
Why isn't this suprising in the least? Why do we continually let the media dictate the terms of the debate, and the range of ideas we allow into the debate? Why has the media decided that Howard Dean's and Joe Liebermann's positions are the "accepted" bounds of the Democratic party, while candidates like Dennis Kucinich and Al Sharpton are marginalized as "fringe" candidates-- even though their views are historically as representative of the party, if not more representative?
Why do we, as Democrats and Americans, continue to put up with this?
I am sick and tired of the media telling me what is a "serious" issue-- especially given the points raised in this article about how they "frame" the debate.
link to full article:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/11/11/cnn_planted_question_at_debate_student_says/