|
I've been thinking that if I could graft certain characteristics from each candidate and conglomerate them, we just might have a "sure-fire" candidate - Kucinich's economic policy and election reform leadership, Dean's fire, Edwards' political military policy, Clark's military experience.....
You see how this works.
So the thought keeps coming to me "Why cannot s/he who gets the exec chair put in place the other candidates as cabinet?" Get the candidates together, get them to be brutally honest about their strengths and present a "group platform" instead of this fragmentation. (Aren't we supposed to be the grown up, mature, able to work together party?)
Would this be a violation of election law?
Or is it just turf warring?
And who would you put where if you were in control?
Politicat
|