Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vote at Senator Frist's website!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:28 PM
Original message
Vote at Senator Frist's website!!!
Senator Harry Reid just pointed out that most of the votes on Frist's website indicate that the senate shouldn't be wasting its time on Priscilla Owen & Co. Keep it that way.

http://frist.senate.gov/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. bwahahaha -- look at the results thus far
Should the Senate exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?

Yes:

26%
No:

74%


3524 total votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Beware of Lurking Freepers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Too late...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Who in Congress should I send that link to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. an of course, they cheat again, as usual
quotes:

I think you can vote more than once. I went back after a couple minutes and noticed this.


Bob J, I went in there and freeped, but then it wouldn't let me leave via my back button. So I had to vote two more times, just to get back to FR. Honest. Really.


Tools...
Internet Options...
Delete Cookies...
Okay...
Vote...



Freepers- if you can't win fairly, then you are LOSERS! Wake up. Cheating is un-American
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. Wow I didn't know freepers were so obvious...
I thought their statements would be a little more discrete than "this poll needs freeping immediately".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a chickenshit trick question! The Constitution says NOTHING
about an "up or down vote."

:grr:
:grr:
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think the web site is down
Hard to get to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Everyone knows to vote NO, right?
Just making sure...the poll is worded in a tricky way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The vote is now
Yes-41
No-59
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Original wording:


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. 41-59, the freepers are gaining!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, good poll, Bill. He took the first one down. Here are old and new
Earlier today, the poll was...


At 7:50 PM ET, it's now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. now it says,,,
"Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?"

Leave no child behind, indeed!

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rads Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. huh?
I just went there and here's the poll, copied-and-pasted:

Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?


What does that even mean? I've got to be missing something....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Now it has a grammar mistake too
"Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Thank heavens!
I read it - and thought I'd slipped a cog....but you all saw the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes: 52% No: 48%
We need to seriously refix this poll!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The Freepers woke up
so we need to start voting again.

Let's get busy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Stinkin' repuke site
Crashed my cherished Opera Browser 2 out of 3 visits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Cat murderer
I think I liked cracker Trent better and I hated him (hate).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. Freeps have been busy.
Yes: 57
No: 43
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragon Turtle Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now it says
Should the Senate minority block the body's Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. They're trying to trick us
They expect us to vote "No" without reading the poll. Ha! They think we're as stupid as Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. Hi Dragon Turtle!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. HE CHANGED THE QUESTION!
http://www.senate.gov/~frist/

"Should the Senate minority block the body's Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?"

VOTE YES!

(Someone needs to monitor this poll. This is like the second time the question has been changed.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Common Republican practice
They're trying to make Reid look like a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. OMG how corrupt
they are. Changing polls language in mid stream...And this is one of the supposed moral repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. BUT he's keeping the vote tally from the previous question!
(As was pointed out in the Senate Debate thread by an astute DUer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Send him a complaint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DEM FAN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. Right Now It's 60 No 40 Yes.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
32. "Technical difficulties"
Here's what I got just now:

"Sorry, the http://frist.senate.gov web page you have requested is experiencing technical difficulties. The Webmaster has been alerted.

You will be automatically redirected to the http://frist.senate.gov Home page after 10 seconds.

If this problem persists, please contact the Office of the Secretary Webmaster at webmaster@sec.senate.gov."

I was NOT automatically redirected.

Guess he took his ball and went home.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. new question up and it can't be voted on...
Edited on Thu Nov-13-03 07:40 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Which highly qualified nominees to the federal bench are being filibustered by Senate Democrats?

<pull down window to click on>
Janice Rogers Brown
Carolyn Kuhl
Priscilla Owen
All of the above

basturds!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. What a bunch of chickenshits.
I got the same.
Cowards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
34. looks like it changed again
Today's Question:
Which highly qualified nominees to the federal bench are being filibustered by Senate Democrats?

Janice Rogers BrownCarolyn KuhlPriscilla Owen All of the above


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Again?!
I voted twice last night since it was changed then got sleepy and went to bed. Typical, they think if they change the way they say something and keep putting it out there we will just give up and let them have it. Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
36. The story of internet poll rigging by Frist is news!
Edited on Thu Nov-13-03 08:07 AM by gulliver
Republicans were losing a poll on their own web site so they changed the poll question!!! It is now rigged so they can't lose. How typical of Republicans.

I hope Reid notices this internet poll rigging and alerts the media. The pubbies rigged a political poll paid for with government funds while the whole world watched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
39. Well, isn't that cute?
Now that that SOB Frist has found a question we DUers can't answer, he's not changing the question every three hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC