Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11 Report: Planes were seen as terrorists' weapons as early as 1994

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GBD4 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 10:13 PM
Original message
9/11 Report: Planes were seen as terrorists' weapons as early as 1994
The 9/11 Report, co-authored by Senator Bob Graham, will be released tomorrow, although smaller excerpts have become available already.

<<"From at least 1994, and continuing into the summer of 2001, the intelligence community received information indicating that terrorists were contemplating, among other means of attack, the use of aircraft as weapons. This information did not stimulate any specific intelligence community assessment of, or collective government reaction to, this form of threat."

"Despite intelligence reporting from 1998 through the summer of 2001 indicating that Osama bin Laden's terrorist network intended to strike inside the United States, the United States government did not undertake a comprehensive effort to implement defensive measures in the United States." >>

Summer of 2001, eh? I remember Dubya vacationing in Crawford. You can't put all the blame on Clinton this time, Dub. And wasn't Rumsfeld saying how no one could've predicted planes used as weapons? Clearly, federal agencies were well aware of the possibilities!

Read more excerpts courtesy of the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel:

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-attacks-intelligence-excerpts,0,5270642.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lkinsale Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I must say...
Considering the Iraq WMD debacle, and this, one begins to wonder just how incredibly at risk we really are.

I find this pretty scary. The first time (9/11) ok, let's give em the benefit of the doubt. But two years later the guys at the top are still so screwed up they "forget" critical peices of evidence about nuclear arms?

I swear, they need to ALL be keeping notebooks like Graham, and be forced to sit down like a bunch of kindergartners and compare notes. Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GBD4 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Graham's comments on Larry King
"The question that started much of these inquiries was the question, could September 11 have been avoided. Different people may read this report and come to a variety of conclusions. In my own position I think the answer is yes, that there were enough gaps, turf protections, and lack of the standard of professionalism that we would expect of intelligence agencies."

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/23/lkl.00.html

Strong words from Florida's senior Senator!

(Senator Graham also pushed the idea that we ought to get many more foreign troops to aid us in Iraq so a sizeable amount of American troops can come on home. He also said more and more people are bugging him about why are we still there, and he noted that Bremer's main responsibility while he's here in the US is to convince the people that it is justified, because given the casualties it is not clearly justified as we at DU would agree!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC