Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm sick of dumb election officials who bash scientists & praise Diebold!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:49 PM
Original message
I'm sick of dumb election officials who bash scientists & praise Diebold!
Kathy Cox (GA), Teresa Lepore (FL), Linda Lamone (MD)...all cut from the same mold- stupid, corrupt, ignorant, scared or a combination.

"Linda Lamone, director of the state elections board, largely dismissed Rubin's concerns and insisted Diebold had completed all the recommended changes in its software. She accused computer scientists of trying to undermine confidence in elections officials".

"I think they're doing a great disservice to democracy," she said. "They're telling the public: Don't trust them, don't trust the voting equipment."

Sure, Linda. Sure. Who is paying you?

http://www.sunspot.net/news/local/bal-md.diebold14nov14,0,3307906.story

The Johns Hopkins University computer scientist who identified security lapses in the voting system Maryland is adopting took his warnings to Annapolis yesterday, telling legislators he has no confidence the flaws are being fixed.

Aviel D. Rubin, technical director of Hopkins' Information Security Institute, criticized the Ehrlich administration's decision to withhold two-thirds of a consultant's report on problems with the Diebold voting system from public view. Rubin said that if the flaws have been fixed there's no justification for secrecy.

snip

Rubin said the Diebold software he examined was vulnerable to an attack by someone wanting to tamper with an election.

"The skill level needed to hide malicious code is much easier than the skills needed to find it," he said. "I don't believe there's a computer scientist or a team in the world that could find it."

snip

Frank Schugar, SAIC's project manager on the election system, conceded that Rubin - whom he described as "extraordinarily qualified and more qualified than I am" - had some valid points.

"Is it easy to hide malicious code in a great big code package? Absolutely," he said - putting the chance it would go undetected at 99.9 percent.

snip

Rubin said yesterday that the original code showed such a lack of competence that he doubted Diebold had the capability required to fix the software. However, he said he would be happy to lend his expertise in determining whether the revised code was secure.

more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. me too. We need another? election where the machines are
so badly programmed the Republicans get the short end of the stick. This is the only way we will get any traction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought that this would be a thread about Global Warming!
You know how the republicans only defense is to dis' the scientists who publish results about global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. an alternative
maybe Lamone is intelligent, informed and honorable, and simply diagrees with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Come on, get real Cocoa. Just whose side are you on?
Edited on Sun Nov-16-03 02:58 PM by TruthIsAll
Do you agree with her stance? If not, how do you account for her bashing the scientists?

If yes, you are beyond hope.

Does she really believe what she is saying? Then she is either stupid (is so computer illiterate she cannot comprehend the dangers) or just ignorant of the facts? I doubt either is true.

OTOH, does she have a personal interest in doing nothing? Then she is either corrupt or scared. Or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC