Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

it was the saudis who attacked us on 9-11, pretend not to notice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 06:52 AM
Original message
it was the saudis who attacked us on 9-11, pretend not to notice
28 pages of the new 'report' on 9-11 are REDACTED, which means blacked out for 'security' reasons. 15 of the so called hijackers were apparently saudis, yet we attacked afghanistan...(?)...then iraq.
WHY? is it because we love the saudis, even after they attacked us?
i just don't get it. does anyone? can someone stop the voices in my head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. like the "liberty" incedent
we love the israeli's though they also attacked us and killed a bunch of americans.... it seems the perverts in washington can only make love to someone who's fucked them.

"redacted" hmm... i've never used that word.. thanks for the vocabulary lesson.. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i'll pretend you didn't say that
why would the saudis, our dear friends and business partners, attack us? why would israel, who we love dearly and support with billions, attack us? jesus....i wish i knew. i'm not even sure i believe it was the saudis attacking us. the official story don't add up. the very next day we had a nice poster with faces and names of the dead 'hijackers', 15 of which were saudi. is it true, or total bullshit? hell, i don't know...does anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is this a good time to bring up the bin Laden's exit cue?
Less we forget, it wasn't just the Saudi citizen terrorists, but it was also the co-inky dinky that our U.S. government allowed the bin Ladens to charter a flight to get their family out of the U.S. shortly after 9/11. Who knew they'd have more than two years before the U.S. public would catch on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slack Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another interessting clue
On Sept.10th 2001, there was a meeting in the National Building Museum by the Carlyle Group which invited some guests. The Bin Laden family, (there were big investors of carlyle), de Benedetti, and (now, wake up) George Bush senior. The story was told by Carlo de Benedetti, an italien industrial magnet, to the "Corriere della Serra" (14.12.02).

of course, it's only hazard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. But, but the Saudis are our friends
I mean, W is still having Prince Abdullah and Prince Bandar over for sleep overs. Even after Bandar's wife gave the terrorists all that money. How could anyone ever think that there was a connection between the Saudis and 9-11. You know it was the Iraqs, no the Iranians, or it could have been the Syrians who were responsible for 9-11. The Saudis would never think of such a thing.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. osama is a GENIOUS!
he wanted the US out of SA so he blew up the WTC, so the US could invade iraq, and then the US no longer needed SA bases to enforce the no-fly zones, so the US is leaving SA now.

that osama, he's a wiley one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. oillah be praised
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't know, mopaul
Maybe the light was better in Afghanistan?

Honestly, the fact that Chimpy is hands off with Saudi Arabia is another notch in the belt of LIHOP as far as I'm concerned. He is, after all, acquiescing to all of Osama's demands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Many more than 28 pages were redacted...
- The 28 pages you refer to are about the Saudi connection...but there are many, many more pages 'missing'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC