|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:27 PM Original message |
Strange to say, but Dick Morris said something thought-provoking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Neh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. They appear to be winning them WITH them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forgethell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Dick is wrong on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. the COULD win elections??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yeah, but I think he meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. He's right only if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-03 11:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. And if the candidate doesn't have to go through a primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-03 12:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. ....or get anything close to a majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-03 12:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Plus they have to have novelty value. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-03 12:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. There's always Wayne Newton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-03 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
10. Rove is already aware of that.We didn't see much of Pat Robertson in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhunt70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-03 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
12. this is probably not right to say but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC