Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Air Force chief (during Persian Gulf War) backs Dean candidacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 08:50 AM
Original message
Former Air Force chief (during Persian Gulf War) backs Dean candidacy
Edited on Tue Nov-18-03 08:53 AM by pruner
Retired Gen. Merrill "Tony" McPeak of Lake Oswego helps bolster the presidential hopeful's military credentials

11/18/03

JEFF MAPES

Retired Gen. Merrill "Tony" McPeak, the former Air Force chief of staff who endorsed George W. Bush in 2000, has left the Republican fold and is backing Democrat Howard Dean in the 2004 race for president.

McPeak, who lives in Lake Oswego, joins a small but growing list of top military veterans who have parted ways with the president at least partly because of the war in Iraq. McPeak's decision could be an important boost for Dean because critics have accused the former Vermont governor of lacking the experience and knowledge needed to be the nation's commander-in-chief.

<snip>

McPeak, who headed the Air Force during the Persian Gulf War in 1991, criticized the Bush administration's policy toward Iraq before the invasion in March. He also said he has become disenchanted with the president's economic policies.

"I don't think the younger Bush has put a foot right since he entered the White House," said McPeak, who changed his registration from Republican to independent in April.

When it comes to Iraq, "we couldn't have sat around a kitchen table and designed a policy that was stupider," McPeak said. He argued that there was no evidence of a connection between Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, "absolutely zero evidence of weapons of mass destruction, and the planning of the formation of the coalition (to support the war in Iraq) was very clumsily done."

<snip>

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1069160753167110.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope he's the first in an avalanche of defectors.
Great news, except for the venomous snakes that will now say this is proof Dean is a closet Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. that's effing awesome!
Now it ought to shut up those who constantly complain about Dean having no creds in foreign policy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. A couple of military endorsements
does not turn Dean into a candidate who is qualified to handle our foreign affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're right, it doesn't because
Dean's been to 52 nations, which is more than I can say for Bush, and Dean also has the executive experience to deal with foreign affairs. Diplomacy requires a gentle hand and I believe Dean has that kind of deftness. Also, the military endorsements help give Dean the ability to say, "I'm not going to be given filtered information, or have my head stuck in sand listening to unilaterists." He can point out that the formerly Republican general who endorsed him did so because the general was so disgusted with Bush's unilaterist foreign policy---it all ties into Dean's stance against Bush's foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Dean good at diplomacy?
Edited on Tue Nov-18-03 09:17 AM by Skwmom
The man calls people cockroaches and boneheads. He's arrogant, belittles people and acts like a bully (these are the characteristics of the Bush admin and we see how well that has played in the world community). In addition, how are world leaders going to trust the word of Howard Dean? The man has been less than honest during this primary process.

In regards to acting unilaterally, in February 2002 Dean supported the US acting unilaterally. What's changed his mind?

There is military people that have and continue to support Bush. That does not make him qualified to handle our foreign affairs and it doesn't make Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. uh....no, he didn't
If he wasn't good at diplomacy, then he wouldn't have been elected five times as Governor, and more recently he wouldn't have brought the AFSCME and the SEIU for an unprecedented double endorsement if he wasn't good at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why not General Clark
You would think that would be his obvious choice,

This is a little like Jesse Jackson Jr's endorsement of Dean that fired up Sharpton so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. actually, I don't think General Clark would care very much about this
endorsement because General Clark obviously can stand on his own where his record comes from in the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC