Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXCUSES, EXCUSES, EXCUSES!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 11:05 AM
Original message
EXCUSES, EXCUSES, EXCUSES!
So the current tactic, in addition to trotting out every Repub in Congress to bash the left for playing "politics", is to say that the story was "mishandled" and that the White House ""stumbled" in their explanations regarding the notorious 16 words. They blame the fact that Bush was in Africa, several aides were on vacation, etc., etc... My, the convoluted rhetoric they'll go through to avoid the obvious reality that they lied and have been lying with every new explantion.

Mary Matalin said yesterday that "we forsook consistency for honesty, in an effort to be as forthcoming as possible in putting out new facts as they became available." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A37481-2003Jul23)

But the problem here is, if you're really being honest, consistency will take care of itself. They didn't put out "new facts as soon as they became available". They have been forced into a series of ongoing confessions as the press has reported the facts which reveal their previous stories to be untrue. The story also did not start when Bush left for Africa (July 7th, the day that Ari Fleischer first said the statement should not have been in the speech), but at the latest in early June, when Ambassador Joseph Wilson came forward with his story.

The latest in the series of ongoing confessionals will occur when Condi Rice is forced (by well-known facts, and not by new information becoming "available") to admit that she was wrong (read "lied") when she said:

"We did not know at the time -- no one knew at the time, in our circles -- maybe someone knew down in the bowels of the agency, but no one in our circles knew that there were doubts and suspicions that this might be a forgery." (Meet the Press, June 8, 2003)

"...somebody down may have known. But I will tell you that when this issue was raised with the intelligence community... the intelligence community did not know at that time, or at levels that got to us, that this, that there were serious questions about this report." (This Week with george Stephanoupolous, June 8, 2003)

...and a host of other statements that are now known to be untrue. She will be the next to take "responsibility", and it is not because of politics or "mishandling the story" or other nonsense. It is simply because it is becoming clear that she, and many others in the White House, have lied to us in an effort to build public support for a war that the public would not otherwise have supported.

The press, and the people, cannot fall for this. They can call it politics all they want, but how obvious does a lie have to be. How obvious does an entire policy, and a war, built on a series of lies have to be? It is NOT just the "16 words", but nearly every word the administration has ever uttered regarding the alleged threat Iraq posed to the United States and the world!

I hope the press, the people, and Congress are not this gullible. So far, it seems like they're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Forsook consistency for honesty"? Wow!!
Call Guinness! We may have a new world record for bullshit shoveling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-03 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. what she really means
they forsook consistency AND honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC