Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why hasn't Clark released ALL of his military records?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:47 PM
Original message
why hasn't Clark released ALL of his military records?
why did he only release the parts where he received glowing reviews?

these questions are addressed to the Clarkies who are carrying Rove's water by demanding that Dean unseal all his records as governor, even though he's not required to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, don't start--I know some Dean bashers began this night of
flaming, but let's end it now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Uhhhhh, maybe he doesn't realise that soldiers don't release their records
The government does. DUH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Clark has begged them to release his records
it's not in his control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Which is what I was saying
I'd expect better from Pruner, normally he's rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:50 PM
Original message
Because Clark's "hidden" military records
...should they exist, won't be a campaign weapon for use against the Good General. Merely bringing them up highlights Bush's inadequacy.

Dean's, however, while almost certainly benign in their contents, will be used to hammer the Good Doctor endlessly.

It's not a matter of Dean being unfit to lead because of the hidden papers. It's a worry that the Right's tactical arsenal against Dean will be yet that much larger than it would be against Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coralrf Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
43. What a ridiculous thread....
Clarks "records" are those of a 4 star general. They will contain a wealth of information that the Army does not want public. There is no 'Monica' in Clarks records just historical information that can be used to analyze US Military policy and strategy.

Records concerning his behavior, commendations and performance are now public. Records concerning his participation in operations of a covert nature will never be publicly released. Never. The GOP will probably not make to much of an issue of this as it begs the same of Bush. Bush has some serious shit to hide.


This cannot be hard to understand.

Unlike X-Ray Dean and ChickenHawk Bush, Clark as asked that his records be released. Dean has made an unnecessary and foolish remark about his and Bush has just lied and lied. We will not see Dean’s as Dean does not want us to. We will not see Bush as his string masters do not want us to. You will see whatever the Army wants you to of Clark’s and that is all there is to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. dupe
Edited on Mon Dec-01-03 08:50 PM by WillyBrandt
dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. A prospective employee would only include the good stuff on his resume.
Edited on Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM by oasis
Anyone dumb enough to add pointless negative stuff, I would not hire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. and a prospective employer (for a high-ranking position) would…
do a little digging into what was left out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:54 PM
Original message
Invalid analogy
Dean's hidden records are a political liability. I suspect they are a minor liability, but they are set another quiver in the Right's arsenal.

Clark's hidden records--are they hidden? I hadn't heard about this--would be of little use to the right for two reasons: the public records are loaded with fulsome praise; and merely bringing the records' up highlights the phoniness of Bush's martial aura.

It's not a matter of the records giving us--voters, the "employers"--a better window into their fitness for governance. It's a matter of denying weapons to the Right in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. As long as those providing any superfluous information got their facts
straight, no problema. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is really getting rediculous
Please stop the insanity. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I think it's a fair question
just as asking Dean about his records is fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. He has ....
... anyone above a two star doesn't get performance reviews like before. He has released all his records. For reviews of his performance above a two-star - they show up on his chest - as medals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh Pruner!
You know this was up yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Give me a break
This is the DEMOCRATIC underground. This is the place to point out Bush's faults, not those of our candidates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is it his decision?
Other than the performance reviews he has released, is Clark able to access these records? I would imagine the Pentagon has rules and regs regarding the release of military records that may contain nat'l security info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. that's what I'm talking about…
do you really believe all his performance reviews were positive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Honestly
I have no idea, but no, they probably were not all 100% positive. Regardless, I don't know if the decision is Clark's to make. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. If there were any "negatives" in his performace reviews
he would not have been promoted to a FOUR STAR GENERAL. I spent 24 years in the Navy. One negative in a performance review offsets one hundred positives. Yes, I believe all his reviews were positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Closer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. And just why
does General Sheldon have SO little respect for Mr. Clark?

Did we ever find out?

Hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. That would be Shelton
With a "t"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. No, it was an empty smear
thrown out without substantiation. It is used gleefully by Fox News Anchors and some of the less gifted DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. General Shelton. One guy. Even if three guys are whining, and I
believe I've only heard three, so what? How many
people had a chance to tell about him in 37 years?

Jeez. Such a non-issue for all of them. Who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
53. You're a troll, and Shelton's a Sore Loser
whose own integrity is about zip, otherwise he'd have it out with Clark once & for all, in public, instead of slinging mud and then refusing to back up his charges with specifics.

At the Clark Meetup tonight in Albuquerque I met a classmate of the General's from West Point. He was a very polite, very patrician man very much like Clark himself, but he did a slow burn at the very mention of Shelton's name. Said Clark's colleagues were all writing letters in support of the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. He stopped recieving reviews after he got 2 stars.
That is the beginning and the end of the story. You can view his full record at http://clark04.com/records/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Snore
How childish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. A non issue meant to divert attention away from a Dean issue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. To Be Fair, It's Not Really A Dean Issue In and Of Itself
It's just that Dean loses a bit of ammunition against Junior...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SEAburb Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. He asked the pentagon to release all of his records
but they won't because some of the them contain "NATIONAL SECURITY" issues. Clark doesn't have control over the release of the records, unlike Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Clark asked them to release his records
He has nothing to hide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Great
Rovian ploy ;) Divert issues by pretending you have one on someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. as a Clark supporter
He should release all records, everyone else should release all records, too. But you can't hold it against him if the government won't let him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. Another one of your shitty threads that never should
have been started. He did release them all, and they were all positive. Going to backtrack (yet again)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Pruner, What Does That Bunny Have On It's Head?
Or am I looking dumb for asking..... :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. I was not going to participate in this thread,
because it's so idiotic, but inquiring minds want to know...

why is that bunny wearing a pancake on his head???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Aw, Pruner, Really how old are you? I gotta know u Crack me up


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpe diem Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
32. he DID release all of his...
...military records, approx. 200 pages worth, from West Point until he got his 3rd star as a General. The Army stops giving performance evaluations after the 3rd star.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/16/elec04.prez.clark.military/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Thank you
That answers the question for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
33. What do you want him to release, his penis size!?! HE HAS! and
he can't get a court to seal them for him!

You guys are TRIPPIN for sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. You must have missed the memo
Clark released all the records he had, If there are any others the army has them and were never his to release, According to army policy, after 2 stars, records aren't required to be kept by Generals in the same manner so whatever records there were after his second star were records the army kept and never in Clarks posession, or his to release, I suggest you contact the army and ask for any additional info you require.

Nice try tho!



retyred in fla
“good night paul, wherever you are”

So I read the book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Why aren't you asking where the *'s records are.
You will never get anywhere trying to make an issue out of Clark's military record. He is the WH's worst nightmare if they are going to run a campaign on national security and foreign policy. Hat's off to the General and ALL the candidates for putting themselves out there for BS like this let alone by the Dems, even if he doesn't get the nomination this country needs more leaders in or out of the military like Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
40. I found some additional Clark Records...
General Wesley Clark was the most decorated soldier since Eisenhower.

Wesley Clark was Knighted by Great Britain for his work with NATO and the Balkans, one of only 11 foreign nationals so recognized.

Wesley Clark was Knighted by the Netherlands.

Wesley Clark received the French "Legion d'Honneur for his service.

Wesley Clark received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Clinton after Kosovo (this is the United States' highest civilian honor).

So, any comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #40
54. I'd still like to see Bush's "lost in the mail" Nat. Guard records...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
41. Frankly besides time in and out who cares.
What he did is pretty well known as he was so high up. Like Bush it is really more important what his big deal father did or made people do for him than what Bush himself did. They were the ones pulling the deal and that is why we do not get the truth. Bush the father got to someone that record will be trashed if it gets out what he did.Or that is how I think it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. You know, I like Dean AND Clark....
What I don't like is the kind of flamebaiting.......

Ok, Go to it, Gladiators..... I'm going to hold back until you guys have taken the first two tiers out.



Sheesh. Nine excellent declared candidates, and once again, we become our own worst enemies. And before anyone takes MY head off, I find the question valid, but the way it was asked repulsive and very disrespectful of other DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
44. kicking for lameness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Here's more on the "records"
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Clark%27s+campaign+release+military+career

WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 — The campaign of Gen. Wesley K. Clark, who has based his Democratic presidential bid on his career in the United States Army, this week released 200 pages of internal military evaluations from his commanding officers, who repeatedly used only superlatives to describe his skills, energy and leadership abilities.
----------
The documents, given by the campaign to The New York Times, are performance evaluations that begin with General Clark's admission to West Point in 1962 and cover more than 30 years of his military career, in which he earned such decorations as a Silver Star, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart.
----------------
One recurring trait that appears in the evaluations is that General Clark always spoke his mind. The evaluations are replete with mentions that he "was not a yes-man," and "says what he thinks."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
45. do you think he was AWOL too?
hehe just kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
47. Because he's EVIL!
EVIIIILLLLL!!!!
:evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin::evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. When will Wesley Clark release...
...his Penang Kitten Kurry recipe?

I hear that it is devilishly delish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
48. Why hasn't chimpy released all of HIS records?
That's the question we're all dying to find the answer to. Man, I go away for a few hours and the place is just crawling with Psy Ops boys from the local Scaiffe foundation.

What's a matter freepers? Scared of a little 4-star general? You guys know you're sitting on a fucking time-bomb with president dumbo. He's gonna go off and take the rest of the gop with it. I just hope he doesn't take the rest of America with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
49. Because those are the parts that say
'And then we burst into the village and killed every man, woman, and child, and then we laughed, because death is funny. haha. And killing babies is fun. And by the way, I am a double agent for PNAC.'

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
51. It's on the record....
Now Dean, however.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC