|
Just got back from my first Clark meet-up here in northern Virginia. Here are some quick thoughts:
1) About 45-50 people attended - mix of old/young, male/female, predominantly white but not exclusively so.
2) Two speakers - one a retired colonel who worked with Clark under Clinton, the other a rep from the VA legislature who is the first pol in VA to endorse Clark.
3) Quite a few military people in the crowd, both retired and civilian (working for the Army, Air Force, etc.). An exceptional amount of knowledge re: how the military works, politics involved, etc. Some very good discussion with regard to Shelton/Cohen and why they have gone public with their comments. The colonel who spoke (I neglected to write his name down - stupid Bear) read earlier comments from both that were quite complimentary of Clark, and surmised that the reasons for his early removal from NATO command was due to personality conflicts (jealousy) and that the replacement for Clark was also due for a 4-star promotion, and this was where they had to put him . Also was fairly adamant in his views that the reason Clinton went along w/same was that he was given faulty information concerning Clark, and that he (Clinton) was "pre-occupied" with other matters at the time. :)
The VA rep that spoke said quite clearly that he could not support a Democratic candidate that could not carry Virginia ( a dig at Dean, mostly). He argued (I believe correctly) that VA is a bellweather state as far as the south is concerned, and that Clark was and is the only candidate that can successfully appeal to the conservative democrats that exist here. Said that * would clobber Dean in the battle for who can keep this nation more secure, but that would be a non-issue against Clark.
Overall, I was VERY impressed with the meet-up. Everyone there believes (as I do) of the need to nominate a candidate with the dreaded "gravitas," and that Clark is that man. For those of you still carrying around that "woe is me, Bush can't lose" - two words.
You're wrong.
|