Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nachi worm infected Diebold ATMs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 08:55 AM
Original message
Nachi worm infected Diebold ATMs
The Nachi worm compromised Windows-based automated teller machines at two financial institutions last August, according to ATM-maker Diebold, in the first confirmed case of malicious code penetrating cash machines.

The machines were in an advanced line of Diebold ATMs built atop Windows XP Embedded, which, like most versions of Windows, was vulnerable to the RPC DCOM security bug exploited by Nachi, and its more famous forebear, Blaster.

At both affected institutions the ATMs began aggressively scanning for other vulnerable machines, generating anomalous waves of network traffic that tripped the banks' intrusion detection systems, resulting in the infected machines being automatically cut off, Diebold executives said.

"The outbound traffic from the ATM was stopped -- limited, from a network standpoint -- and effectively isolated," said Nick Billett, Diebold's director of software engineering. "In many cases, the machines were cleaned up that day."

A patch for the critical RPC DCOM hole had been available from Microsoft for over a month at the time of the attack,but Diebold had neglected to install it in the infected machines. Billett defended the company's patching process, which he said involves testing each new bug fix, and deploying at a wide variety of institutions with a mix of network architectures. "A lot of those machines actually have to be visited by a service technician" to be patched, said Billett. "Our experience in the past is we are able to turn those around in one or two days."

More here.....

Not sure if this has been posted yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mumishka Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Diebold needs investigation
Read Paul Klugman in today's NY Times Op ed. Is Diebold destroying democracy? That is the question everyone should be focused on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mumishka Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Diebold needs investigation
Read Paul Klugman in today's NY Times Op ed. Is Diebold destroying democracy? That is the question everyone should be focused on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Any banker types out there with info on Check 21?
Within a year, checks clearing banks will not be physically sent on to the Fed Reserve. They will be transmitted electronically. It means all new systems for banks. I was wondering what companies make the hardware and software for this new system. Sure it should make bank transactions faster and cheaper (for the banks) in the long run, but there will be a lot of $$ involved in gearing up for it.

Who is gonna make the bundle selling the required equipment? And how secure will it all be?

I am not a techie, so I need simple answers. Since Diebold makes so much used in banking, could this be a payoff for their assistance in congressional races that suddenly went GOP? And since BBV and others have shown Diebold to be so lax about security, are our banking insitutions gonna be open to even more danger from hacking, viruses, just plain ol greedy bastards who have a track record for juggling books?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Former teller/banker here
Scares the shit out of me. I refuse to give checks to businesses who use electronic processing now.

Number 1, what happens to my physical check? How do I know it won't end up in the hands of shady characters?

Number 2, if the business or their bank processes the check for an incorrect amount, what proof do I have that the check was written for a different amount?

Number 3, if the check is processed electronically, the bank cannot verify that my signature is on it, or that any signature is on it for that matter.

The good news is that the banking industry is highly regulated with triple and quadruple checks and balances. That is the difference between diebold's work in the banking industry and their work in voting machines. I trust my bank because I know that bank regulators, the treasury department and its stockholders and in some cases the FBI all have their eyes on everything that gets done there. The depression of the 30's with its run on banks taught Bankers that their success or failure depends on how trustworthy their customers view them. They work hard to make accuracy their first job.

We are both the bank and the consumers when it comes to voting machines and we have to be out there demanding the same accuracy, the same security and the same oversight. That is the answer.

This is probably not what you were looking for but as close as I can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks, yes, I know the banks are well controlled
Just wanna find out about this Check 21 and who stands to make the big bucks selling equipment for the changes. ALL banking will be via electiconic transmittal by next Oct. No one will get cancelled checks back. You bank will not have your checks if they are cashiered out of the area. Only electiconic imagaining forms.

Somebody is makeing $$ on this and I bet Diebold has a big cut coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC