Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great - DeLay escapes subpoena in TX redistricting suit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:28 AM
Original message
Great - DeLay escapes subpoena in TX redistricting suit
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2263383

clip/

Democrats can't question DeLay on redistricting
By R.G. RATCLIFFE
Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau
AUSTIN -- A three-judge federal court Monday rejected Democrats' attempts to question U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay about his role in helping the Legislature pass a Republican congressional redistricting plan this year.

clip/

apologies if duplicative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I'm prepared to lose now.
Come on, this court has to be kidding me! How can they say Tom DeLay wasn't a central figure? HE THOUGHT UP THE WHOLE DAMNED IDEA!!!!

:argh: We're so screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. pretty much
but they still have to take the central issue into consideration: are these new districts fairly representative of the demographics revealed in the last census.... and the winner is: ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just knew this was going to happen
Maybe a bunch of us can move to Delay's district long enough to vote to get him out of there - only thing I can think of and I sure don't want to live where he "rules"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. hmm... I really like my pad....
maybe a PO Box???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I've still got my "Honorary Texas Resident" certificate
from the 1980s Doonesbury strip.

Think I qualify?

Richfield Ohio.

I've passed through Texas twice on my quest for a vacation. (Essentially, four times, if you don't count round trips as one passage).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Would that be the same Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that
held that Dickless Cheney was a "resident" of Wyoming (after he lived, registered to vote but didn't in Dallas, had homestead exemption in Dallas, worked in Dallas, etc) so that he could run for VP and escape the prohibition of Prez and VP coming from same state?

Gee. I'm shocked, shocked, I tell you that the republican judges on the Fifth Circuit would give DeLay a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. looks like they done it agin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. The lawyer missed the boat
on this one. I'm not a lawyer but instead of countering Delay's arguments by whining that he (DeLay) was being secretive and not conducting important Washington business anyway, the Dem's lawyer should have argued that DeLay has a motive for a direct and personal benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Actually
what I read about the quashing is that it still gives leeway to the plaintiff to re-subponea DeLay later on a critical basis that DeLay is needed to testify. DeLay didn't get away with it.. yet..


Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Can't they appeal the decision to quash?
I know I would if I were they!x(

One way or another, though, this (illegal Texas re-districting) WILL be overturned, whether the Cockroach has to testify about it or not-- just as the Colorado abomination was.

He is truly the MOST EVIL person in Congress in a looooooong time--and looks as gross as he acts!:mad:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Notice how they failed to mention how the vote went
In Bushevik-occupied Imperial Amerika, 2 Bushevik Operatives pretending to be "judges" on a Three-"Judge" Panel means the Busheviks will win every time.

Every time.

Every...single...time.

And though it would be far too little and far too late, I would love to see a study on Federalist "Judges" ruling in cases where plaintiff or defendant is Federalist or Bushevik-connected. Comparison to Democratic judges and their votes on Democratic defendants/plaintiffs.

Though I don't need to see it. This is Imperial Amerika, where everything political is as obvious and predictable as Hitler's winning the 1936 plebiscite or Saddam winning re-election.

Here's my guess, not that such a study would EVER be allowed to come to light by the Imperial Family:

Federalist "judge" with Federalist defendant/plaintiff =90% favorable ruling

Democratic "judge" with Democratic defendant/plaintiff =60% favorable ruling


Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Umm..... don't know - but hope it's not irretrievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC