|
I am pasted the text of an email I sent to two of my friends this morning:
Hi Guys,
This morning, I've contacted the Ada County Human Rights Task force via email, and I've spoken to the ACLU by phone, in addition to email. The ACLU being the super groovy place that it is, transferred me and let me talk directly to one of their staff lawyers, and here's the deal:
The monument is not in a place where it is "officially being considered" by the city, so Fox local news basically just lied about that. What is going on is, there are some religious groups that are rallying over the Ten Commandments monument that is in Julia Davis park. They are rallying to protect or defend the monument I guess, but the Ten Commandments monument is under no threat of any kind. No one is suing for its removal, nothing is going on, but they are rallying anyway. Just goes to further my opinion that if you left a fundamentalist Christian in a room alone with himself for long enough, he'd kick his own ass. :)
Anyway, the monument of hate, as I choose to call it (the matthew sheperd bashing momument), is actually being sponsored and proposed by none other than Fred Phelps. Now, of course this is a truly wicked, wicked man, but I was actually relived to hear this. (By the way, for anyone who is unfamiliar with Phelps, just go to godhatesfags.com). The reason I was relieved is because Phelps is so clearly identified as a bigoted hate extremist that no city in their right mind would ever actually approve a monument proposal of his!
The ACLU lawyer told me that all that has happened now is that Phelps heard about that the 10 Commandments monument was allowed in the Park, and now wants to place his monument there, under the argument that is one religious point of view is allowed in a public square, all religious views should be allowed without discrimination. The funny thing about this is, he is totally right. That is why religion and the state should STAY SEPARATE and why the state shouldn't endorse ANY religious view in the public square, because once you endorse one, quite honestly you have to allow them all, otherwise it truly is discriminatory.
Anyway, I digress. The Lawyer told me that there was an article in the paper this morning in which some council members said this monument would be approved "over their dead bodies" and the ACLU feels that there is no real threat of the monument proposal ever getting anyway, however they are monitoring it.
Now, here's where it gets worse - on December 14th, there will be a rally in the park by Ten Commandment monument supporters. Find and dandy, they have a right to assemble, and I don't really have any passionate problem with that. HOWEVER, Fred Phelps people will be there TOO demonstrating with the "God Hates Fags" and "Burn in Hell, QUEER" picket signs...
The have a right to protest, however I also have a right not to sit on my ass and silently take it. Last year, Phelps people were here and you know what happened? A bunch of people from the Ada County Human Rights Task force all wore "wings" with a five foot wingspan and stood hand in hand in a line in front of the Phelps protester, obscuring them from the cameras and from passers by! To me that's the most beautiful kind of counter there could possible be.
On December 14th, the same day as the Fred Phelps god hates fags rally, there will be alternative peace rally at near by Ann Frank memorial -- I plan to be there. I plan to resist Fred Phelps hateful garbage not just with my mouth, but with my fucking body.
Andrew
|