Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm looking for a one-page flyer to post around town explaining The Draft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:42 PM
Original message
I'm looking for a one-page flyer to post around town explaining The Draft
It needs to cleary state, in some excellent manner, that Bush in 2004 = Draft in 2005

Suggestions? Link? Thanks!

I will pepper this city like I did before the war/invasion...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
boneygrey Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excuse my ignorance
Are you talking about the draft Rangle wants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, the draft Bushco wants to wage a multiple front war.
Rangel introduced the bill to call their bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boneygrey Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Rangel
I think he was serious and I agree. With his draft there would be no "Fortunate Sons". Great CCR song
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
travisleit01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think
he means the draft that might be activated mid-2005 due to a shortage of soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Rangel bill will NEVER pass, it drafts women and the GOP hates it
Go here, they have a great poster of Bush and Wolfie:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dems Will Win, you are awesome!!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks Frank! Work it!
Hang it up at the colleges especially!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. i will
you got it. i work at a college. i've been trying to scare these kids. the ones who are already alarmed by BushCo get furious, but most still don't see it.

thanks for the wonderful banner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. If things are bad enough they won't wait until 05.
At least that's my fear. It wouldn't be all that hard to pass a selective service bill requiring all 18 year olds to report. Or kid gets h.s. diploma and goes directly to the induction center.

This administration has a history of passing major legislation with little or no debate or discussion. They'll do it again in a heartbeat to draft young men (and possibly women) if they want to or think it's necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSR40004 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Really really doubtful
You know the military doesn't want a draft and it has no support... worry about better things IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oh yeah? Well read this and get back to me will ya? Thanks!
George W. Bush is moving to re-activate the DRAFT and have the first Lottery drawing of 20-year old men, as well as doctors, nurses, computer specialists, linguists and engineers by June 15, 2005, AFTER the 2004 election. Please help get the word out. They are soon going to have a Special Skills draft as well, meaning they can draft anyone up to age 45, if the Pentagon says they have a shortage in that area. Arab linguists will be inducted first, then many others. Lewis Brodsky himself said this was a priority. As it is, upon activation, all 3.4 million doctors and nurses under 45 will have to register with the SSS.

The official Selective Service site clearly says that $28 million is being spent next year to have the draft ready for activation within 75 days by March 31, 2005, conveniently AFTER the 2004 election. All Bush has to do is say "We are not going to Cut and Run from Iraq, but we have no more men. THe Pentagon has told me we need to activate the Selective Service System". The scrubbed Draft Board recruitment ad (the first in decades), was just the tip of the following $28 million iceberg headed for a home near you:

http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html (This was part of the Defense bill passed November 24 I think)

Strategic Goal 1: Increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the Manpower Delivery Systems (Projected allocation for FY 2004 – $7,942,000)

Strategic Goal 2: Improve overall Registration Compliance and Service to the Public (Projected allocation FY 2004 – $8,769,000)

Strategic Goal 3: Enhance external and internal customer service
(Projected allocation for FY 2004 – $10,624,000)

Strategic Goal 4: Enhance the system which guarantees that each conscientious objector is properly classified, placed, and monitored.(Projected allocation for FY 2004 – $955,000)

Total=$28,290,000



An annual report providing the results of the implementation of these performance
measures will be submitted by March 31, 2005. This report will address attained versus
planned levels of performance, explain unattained target levels, and identify where and
how strategies, performance goals, and performance indicators should be changed to
ensure that the SSS reaches its strategic and annual goals and objectives.

tie that paragraph to this one:

Strategic Objective 1.2: Ensure a mobilization infrastructure of 56 State Headquarters,
442 Area Offices and 1,980 Local Boards are operational within 75 days of an authorized
return to conscription.

They are reducing draft activation time to 75 days from the current 7-8 months. The first draft lottery according to this official document could be June 15, 2005.

Question: why does a dormant agancy need to be ready to answer all correspondence in 10 days?

They said "no plans" yet they are conducting nation-wide exercises far beyond what is needed for a dormant agency. This is really a plan to get the whole system ready for activation within the 75 days proscribed, although Congress must authorize the actual activation. They are trying to stop this discussion by saying "no plans", making everybody think it's off the table. They just mean Bush has "no plans" to ask Congress at this time. Yet on April 1, 2005, according to this he could ask for activation and have it in 75 days.

Also draft boards reported being "unexpectedly" asked during summer training sessions to fill the Board vacancies (salon.com from a Philly draft Board member)

Also Rumsfeld's leaked memo said "long hard slog" and "we have not made any truly bold moves yet"--and that was after Iraq and Afghanistan.

They are even making sure the Alternative Service is all exercised and ready to go within 75 days of March 31, 2005.

This is called Performance improvement but it looks exactly like a readiness action. They are bringing the whole system up to 90% + operational capability after 30 years of dormancy. Obviously, with a war on terror this could be considered prudent (although you don't need a draft to catch Osama Bin Laden and several thousand al-Queadas). Then why did they scrub the Draft Board notice? Why not come say out front we are filling the Draft Boards and gearing up the system in case the President needs it to fight the war on terror?

Congress would of course have to approve, supposedly after a Joint Session by the President where he could easily say "we are not going to cut and run" (same was said in Vietnam). By March 31, 2005, the draft may only be 75 days away.

This changes the dynamics of this issue, because people will say OK, Bush is getting the first draft lottery ready by June 15, 2005 if we need it. Now do I trust him or the Democrat more to not reinstate, given Iraq and PNAC?

In additon Brodsky, the head of SSS, says a priority will be drafting Special Skills Personnel: 20 to 45 year-old computer experts, linguists (especially Islamic languages), and engineers. All 3.4 million doctors and nurses under 45 will have to register at their local Post Office in 2005 if Bush gets Congress's permission. All signs are they will ask for the draft at that earliest possible moment and will probably establish the Special Skills Personnel Delivery System (like the HCPDS) even sooner, as soon as the election is over in November, 2004, although these computer programmers and engineers would not have to register until the draft was activiated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, if they really do wait
until June 15, 2005, my kid will be able to finish high school and then get the hell out of the country. But I'm afraid they'll get Canada to refuse to admit 18-26 year old males who haven't completed their service.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC