Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does "terrorism" mean and can a war on terrorism ever be won?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:44 AM
Original message
What does "terrorism" mean and can a war on terrorism ever be won?
I had a discussion yesterday with a freeper at work about what he thought terrorim meant.

He said it was covert acts of violence.

This was in response to my analogy that fighting terrorism is like fighting blitzkriegs.

His explanation was that it was ok to attack or invade other countries if their countrymen (even if not sponsored by their governments) performed acts of violence against the U.S.

I asked what if a dane attacked the U.S. - should we invade Denmark. No, he said, because they are our ally.

I am going crazy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Terrorism has no country. It is an impossibility to fight a war
Edited on Fri Dec-05-03 11:46 AM by LittleApple81
on terrorism as if it were sponsored by a state.

It is a good excuse, for American addled minds, though. Gives us something to concentrate our anger on.

It is like the war on drugs. We have be losing this one for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Terrorism is
an act of violence carried out by those whom we oppose (Al-Qaeda presently). Those same acts carried out by those we support are called freedom fighters (Al-Qaeda in the 80s). And no, the war cannot be won; we cannot force people to like, or even tolerate, us through bombing campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. terrorist (n): anyone that B*sh doesn't like.
I really hate how it's become fashionable to declare war on concepts, like "(some) Drugs" or "Terrorism" or what have you. The only way to kill a concept is to kill everyone who knows what the word means, and even then it probably won't work. How long will it take some enterprising young man to lick the proper species of toad and go "whooooaaaaa..."?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Nothing" and "no". (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe these threads will help
Edited on Fri Dec-05-03 11:53 AM by Paschall
Terrorism is a Technique, Not an Enemy State
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=22515

"The Bubble of American Supremacy" is about to Burst, by George Soros
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=762708

By the way, his definition of terrorism as "covert acts of violence" is completely off the mark. Terrorist violence is designed to be flagrant, otherwise it doesn't provoke any terror. Duh! Maybe he means violence by covert agents, but that's not satisfactory either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. excellent stuff!
From your top link:

<snip>
'the "war" on terror should have remained what it initially was, a metaphor like the "war" on drugs. But instead of being harmless linguistic exaggeration to describe a broad campaign encompassing a range of political, economic and police counter-measures, it was narrowed down to real war and nothing else. '
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. covert acts of violence?
you mean like the ones reagan waged all over latin america

or kissinger in Chile and Argentina

or the ones waged by the fbi against the civil rights movement

or the cia actions recently in venenzuela

or the types of actions taught at the SOA

need i go on?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. What terrorism? Where is it? Is it being perped against US?
1. There are no terrorist acts being perped against the US that are NOT instigated;

2. There isn't any, to begin with.

3. No, it isn't. We haven't been threated by anyone. 2 attacks in two hundred years by nutcases who are now dead doesn't constitute a spate of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Only two cases in our country
me thinks you have to do a little homework about all the attacks against us overseas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Two attacks?
I think your math needs work.

Even if you count 9-11 as one attack, and I wouldn't since it had multiple targets, this was the second attack on the World Trade Center. There there is the Murrah Building. And how do you count th anthrax attacks? What about the attacks that are stopped? How far back do you wish to go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reachout Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fighting terrorism with war...
is like fighting a swarm of bees with a pistol. If you're lucky, you might nail one now and again, but the swarm will just keep on stinging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. great analogy!
and these bees don't live in a hive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. And of course, the more you swat (or shoot) at bees....
...the more agressive they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. You can't really beat terrorism
But you can keep it on the run to prevent massive attacks. Why this Bush war is so fucked up, all that is needed is a handfull of spec ops types to keep the terrorists looking over their shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPG-7 Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. They are cold warriors
Edited on Fri Dec-05-03 12:13 PM by RPG-7
They have no idea how to play fourth generation warfare. You basically have a field of WWI Battleship Admirals up against people using carrier tactics. It's pitiful, and what is more sad is there is no way you can explain to people that the answer to terrorism is in no way addressed by running a bunch of tanks into a foreign capital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Hi RPG-7!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. You can't eradicate terrorism. To say the contrary is a lie.
Terrorism is like murder - it's never going to go away.

That being said, terror today is nothing but a political banner you can hide behind as you work for other agendas. In the 40s and 50s it was communism. Now it's terrorism.

"The War on Terra" hides racism, supremism, an agenda for militarily aquired world domination, and religious singularity. And the greatest friend of these schemers, looters and murderers is the common American citizen who does not want to even hear why some peoples around the world have become pissed off enough to want to kill us. That is the PNAC's greatest accomplishment to date, and the public umbrella of invulnerability given to BushCo.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. But you still have to fight it
Because trust me, it is fighting us and if we don't, we'll wake up one day and have a city or two turned to dust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Definition of terrorism
terrorism: "...the systematic use of terror or unpredictable violence against governments, publics, or individuals to attain a political objective. Terrorism has been used by political organizations with both rightist and leftist objectives, by nationalistic and ethnic groups, by revolutionaries, and by the armies and secret police of governments themselves."

Terrorism is defined in the U.S. by the Code of Federal Regulations as: "..the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)

The FBI further describes terrorism as either domestic or international, depending on the origin, base, and objectives of the terrorists:
• Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or its territories without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
• International terrorism involves violent acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any state, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or any state. These acts appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or affect the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping. International terrorist acts occur outside the United States or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to coerce or intimidate, or the locale in which the perpetrations operate or seek asylum.

The war on terrorism will be won right after we win the war on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldSoldier Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Terrorism is like porn--you know it when you see it
And you knew someone was going to pull that out!

Technically, terrorism is any action, taken illegally, that causes fear in the person against whom the action was taken.

I could call you up in the middle of the night, every night, and whisper "I'm gonna getcha!" After a while, you'd be scared, a bit, if you had any sense at all. If I did it once it would be a stupid prank; it's a different story when I'm doing the same thing for months on end. You start wondering if someone really is gonna getcha. Throw in a few cars driving past your house at idle speed with menacing-looking people looking at you through the window, and you'd be scared shitless if you had any brains. That's terrorism too, but it would be a bit hard to prosecute someone on a terra charge if all you had against him were a string of 3am phone calls. Harassment yes, terrorism no.

Acts of violence are much easier to call as terrorism, but they're not the only acts of terrorism out there.

And I think these virus writers are terrorists, but so far the DHS isn't going after them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. Terrorism needs to be fought with Intelligence Agents, not Armymen
Edited on Fri Dec-05-03 10:36 PM by japanduh
Terrorism is fundamentally a covert action. Even if the end results are dramtically overt. We need to beef up the CIA instead of breaking it down like Cheney and Co. are doing. There can be no real "War" on Terrorism any more than there is a "War" on crime. Terrorism is like a crime, you just gotta get the detectives out there and sniff out the operation through connections, insiders, informants, chatter, undercover, interesting movement, etc..

Problem is, these operations usually take place outside the U.S., and the U.S. has pretty much decimated its trust and relationship with a lot of these countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Terrorism is an attempt to 'criminalize' conflict
It says less about the legality of such acts than it does to the pre eminent legitmacy of the US to be defined in the role of top cop.

Simply reducing geo-political struggle to a function of an emotional state is the height of anti-intellectualism.
This 'war' is not a war, but a metaphor of the same racially and class motivated 'fear' factory that has been used domestically to manipulate people to treat things 'public' with fear and hostility. --

The ruling classes are simply extending the program to international affairs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Terrorism is merely a TACTIC
Edited on Fri Dec-05-03 11:04 PM by SoCalDem
The fundamentalist/fatalistic thinking that terrorists employ cannot ever be fought with weapons..

Viet Nam and Korea should have taught us THAT lesson.. We bailed on both of them because it finally dawned on us, that we could not win..

People who believe in their bones that they are right, will never give up..

We cannot kill them all..even though the fundies in our country would love it..

The old way of war fighting is ..O V E R ..

A ragtag bunch of religious zealots can board a plane, a bus, a car, a train, and as long as they are willing to die or be caught and imprisoned, they will do whatever they please.. We can never stop them 100% of the time.. For us to "win", that is what we must do.. They only have to succeed every so often, to keep us on edge and unnerved..

It would have to be cheaper all round to use a small fraction of what a war costs, to actually start addressiing some of the injustices that make these people so upset, that they would resort to this..

It seems that as long as countries occupy and bully other countries, this will never end..

Maybe Mom did know best.. All Moms say "Stay out of other people's business".."Keep your hands to yourself".. "Leave each other alone"..
"Share your toys".. "Play Nice"..

We can never "win" a war on terrorism...or on "drugs".. or on poverty..

We can defeat an army, navy.air force because we have superior armaments.. We are sorely lacking in interpersonal and global social skills, and it's killing us...and them..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC