Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which makes you madder, putting Reagan on a coin, or taking FDR off?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gringo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:15 PM
Original message
Which makes you madder, putting Reagan on a coin, or taking FDR off?
Personally, I'm more annoyed at the idea of removing the greates president, FDR, from the dime than I am at putting Reagan on.

I know Reagan (and Bush sr.) was responsible for a lot of crime and was a lousy president, but he's a major hero to the wingnuts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Equal loathing.. Take your pick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Taking FDR off.. .though it's close
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:18 PM
Original message
Taking FDR off
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Me, too
Especially since FDR had polio and he was put on the dime in the first place to honor his support of the March of Dimes. This GOP move to steal our dime should be fought very, very hard. But it goes beyond Democrats. Anybody old enough to remember polio and the March of Dimes would be horrified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I never knew that
It makes perfect sense though, and it makes me even angrier to think that they want to remove FDR.

(and the March of Dimes is still around and kicking, btw- you don't have to be "old" to remember them!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
54. I wish they would come out with a statement
I suspect that they want to avoid appearing political, but it should be an insult to them to even suggest removing FDR from the dime. The effort that FDR gave in the fight against polio, and the continuing good that the March of Dimes does to this day, should transcend politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. March of Dimes (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. It they do this sacrilege, pass the word
that the raygun dime is really counterfeit. Insist on the FDR dimes when getting change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
47. they're trying to erase shared history of fight against polio
Why? Well ...

There was once a time when Americans banded together to make the world better and safer. Millions of ordinary citizens sent dimes to the White House -- this fund paid for the research that developed the vaccines that are still being used today. The UN says we're on the verge of eradicating polio! They say it could happen this decade. This is the kind of thing that gave America such a shining reputation for technological advances, AND philanthropy. It's part of a heritage all Americans should justifiably be proud of.

But it's part of the "old America", where Republicans and Democrats worked to help everybody -- and the government could help motivate private charities for something other than Bible-thumping and making money.

The White House admits that they took the "send a dollar for Afghan children" idea right from FDR.

It's a sad day when the party of Lincoln would get hysterical about any slightly critical assessment of, say, Ronald Reagan (witness the CBS movie) -- while at the same time denying that any Democrat would ever do anything helpful and inspiring. Now I see why my uncle, a longtime Republican, would rather vote for Pat Buchanan than the Bush administration.

Really, I don't begrudge them wanting to put Reagan's image on a coin. But being so dismissive of FDR ... there are plenty of Democrats who admire Lincoln, TR, and Eisenhower, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Removing FDR makes me madder
They are sending a message by doing this, and it's a chilling one. Putting Reagan on? Heck, they want to name everything for Reagan. That's not new. Trying to erase FDR from our collective memory - that's what this is all about. Why not the quarter (Washington too sacrosanct). Why not the penny (same for Lincoln, also GOP). Why FDR? If he was around now, he would kick the bastards rhetorically. Are you listening, Tom Daschle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Reagan on
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just the thought of equating Reagan's significance with FDR
is enough to make me violently ill. Reagan happenned to be sitting (mindlessly) in the White House when the USSR imploded upon itself, so he's credited with "winning the cold war"

Yeah, right :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Actually George I was president...
when the USSR went belly up in 1991.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. Right on!
Every president since Truman is responsible for ending the cold war. Hannity and Rush give credit to Raygun. There has been a concerted effort to discredit FDR by swine. Pig fuckers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. is it definite?
I see all the threads about this, but isn't just a RW fantasy at this point? You all make it sound like a foregine conclusion.

And btw, Lincoln was the greatest president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. "Ronald Reagan Dime Act"
GOP wants to kick FDR off the dime



A group of Republican congressmen is campaigning to replace Franklin Delano Roosevelt's image on the dime with that of Ronald Reagan.

The Los Angeles Daily News said Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., introduced the legislation to replace the Democratic architect of the New Deal from all future 10-cent coins.

About 80 lawmakers, all Republicans, have signed as co-sponsors of the Ronald Reagan Dime Act.


:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. fuckers
I burned a lot of posts raging about Reagan yesterday. Diapered dimbulb dickwad, for all time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
45. Petty bastards, HOW MUCH WILL THIS COST THE TAXPAYERS?!
Let 'em do what they want. I sure as hell won't use dimes anymore.

Jesus fucking christ, we're $7 trillion in debt and we're going to be this fucking frivolous?

PARTY OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY?!?!?!

Let them all be cremated alive for all I care anymore. They're all nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Both equally
But if I had to choose, I think taking FDR off gets to me more. Reagan might be okay on a wooden nickel. That's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Taking FDR off is a terrible idea - he led us in WWII
Reagan is a recent prez, it's like trying to put on Clinton, I wouldn't want that either. This is nothing but a political move to help the GOP sell itself. They better not do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Taking FDR off
To me, it reeks of more revisionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Both about the same
Maybe _slightly_ more annoyed at putting Ray-gun on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. But Reagan isn't dead yet, is he?
How can they put his likeness on a coin if he's still sucking air?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Appearantly theres technically no law against it,
its just been tradition, youd think the cons would want to preserve traditional things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. They don't care
They have no concept of manners or tradition. They just want that evil man's ugly face on the money, NOW!

Removing FDR's face wouldn't bother me much, as long as they went back to the beautiful old Mercury head or put a personified concept like "liberty" on. I dislike having politicians of any variety on the money, and think our ideals belong there, not men.

If they put Reagans horrible likeness on the money (unless it's a stamp on every bounced check), I'll be asking for alternatives when I get change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. FDR off is worse
We have to wait--what 5 years after they die?-- to put someone on a stamp but Reagan can be on a dime while still alive?

Shouldn't it be those in the future who judge the greatness of a President to determine if he deserves this honor? In hindsight, we can say great things about FDR. Reagan's history is too "new" to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Well I guess
FDR was put on the dime 1946

JFK on the half dollar in 1964

I know its insulting to mention these men in the same breath as Reagan, but we didnt wait very long to put both of these men on coins after they have died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Put Reagan on
the penny. Indicative of the trickle down economic policies he's known for.
Then in a year, go ahead and take the penny out of circulation since the fed. is contemplating that anyway...

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Design8edGrouch Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's FDR's dime!
If they must have his image plastered on a coin let it be on a two or 5 dollar coin. That way us common folk will never have to see it. Besides a $5 piece would nver circulate. But leave the FDR dime alone. FDR has two natural claims to the dime--his work with the March of Dimes to eradicate Polio and the Depression era song: "Once I ran a railroad...Brother, can you spare a dime?" Can you spare a dime was the phrase that symbolized the tragedy of the Great Depression and FDR lead the nation through it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. WTF! I had no idea this was in the works!
isn't this something we should get to vote on???

tell me again why Reagan is considered a good president???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. DAMN CONSERVATIVES
Next thing you know they will want Nixon on the 3$ bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldSoldier Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
58. I thought he was!
You know what I'd like to see? A $25 bill.

It would take four of them to get to $100--meaning less bulk in your cash drawer, less shipping weight and quicker counting cycles. (Important to people who handle a very large amount of money--stores, banks, armored car companies.) It would save paper too. And when I go to the store to buy something that's $19.95, I need two more dollars to make the sales tax (yes, I do get change from my $22). But the same transaction with a $25 would require only one bill.

They could handle it by coloring it blue or red and phasing out the $20.

And they could put Bankrupting Ronnie on the $25.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. What are the chances of this actually happening?
What are the odds you think? If they do, I believe it could blow up in their faces, and make them into a laughing stock...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I think that Congress has to approve it???
I remember the furor in 1964 when they took Franklin off the half dollar, to put JFK on. But it SEEMS like Congress voted on it. Otherwise, the dirctor of the Mint would do it.

But, then again, how many pink tutu Dems would vote for this???? A shitload, no doubt!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
52. Technically speaking, Congress wouldn't have to vote on it
as per the Law of 1890, which required that a coin's design be current for at least 25 production years and could be changed by the Director of the Mint after that. In the case of the switch from Franklin to Kennedy, the Franklin design had been current for a mere 16 production years (1948-1963), so it took an act of Congress to change the design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Both..
Someone needs to find the dirt on that little troll, Grover Nutquist.. He has made it his life's work..to get EVERYTHING named after Reagan..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. Taking FDR off....
bastards. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Taking FDR off
I wouldn't be so disgusted if we were removing a statue of Columbia or an eagle or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. They can put him on a dime; they can put him on Mt. Rushmore
but it still won't change the fact that he was a shitty president and I believe that history will bear that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. putting the mass murderer on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. Putting Raygun on
The only place I want to see that bastard's ugly mug is in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. If the Mint offers a plugged nickel
they can put Reagan's face on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. I frankly do not care, Each has his day.
FDR did stand for a lot and Reagon was just sort of a Mid-range guy who the GOP would dearly like to be great. But calling him great does not make him that way and FDR has his greatness all set. It is hard to place the new GOP. I almost think the Right wing is its oun party and has lost the Grand Old Party.Times are really changing. Maybe Weber and Durkhiem were right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
36. fark.com weighs in...!!!
"The Reagan Legacy Project wants to put Reagan's head on the dime. Photoshop some other Reagan Legacy Project ideas"
http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=739457
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #36
57. Oh my God! It's Ronnie Kramer!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
37. Taking FDR off...
and to replace him with that stupid man....ick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. Taking FDR off!!!!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
41. Fucking Reagan made movies during WWII.
While FDR helped save the world.

Reagan isn't fit to wipe FDR's ass, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
42. Taking FDR off!
The final insult to the movement to dismantle the new deal. Pisses me off royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
43. Taking FDR off! If Reagan "must" be on a coin, mint a hapenny for his mug.
Reagan's worth would be well balanced by a halfpenny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
44. Taking the NEW DEAL off
That's what taking FDR off of a coin does. Puts FDR and his entire Presidency in the dust bin and replaces his policies with Reagan's policies. It's psychological and ought to be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. Well said. That's what this is all about.
Not to praise Reagan but to purge New Dealism from the govt. The bastids!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chromotone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
46. Six of one, half a dozen of the other...
If Raygun needs to be on a coin, I'd suggest the "plugged nickel" (assuming no one else has suggested this).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. I will vote for the ha'penny. 1/2 cent piece of England old
Better yet, a farthling, 1/4 penny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackie97 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. Putting Reagan on.
I do think that FDR was one of our better presidents. He created the New Deal after all.

To replace him with a pig who started trying to destroy the New Deal is a disgrace. Reagan's supply side economics was a further disaster on the poor than some of the other damage done to the poor.

Reagan escelated the war on drugs. He put in policies that would target people that happened to be black most of time. He really escelated a war on poor and black people. It was not drugs. So many people would start going to prison, that they would have to let violent criminals out for people who were involved with drugs. That would even go for people who simply posessed the drugs.

He helped to escelate the war on drugs by bringing it to other countries. He also escelated the cold war in other countries. This stuff was violent and genocidal in some countries. It also was supportive of dictatorships who would help us fight the cold war.

The bastard would help Saddam Hussein out in the Iran/Iraq war by helping Iraq get weapons. He knew good and well that Iraq was using them to gas people too. The administration condemned it openly, while still helping Iraq out.

Why does the United States want to make a hero out of a mass murderer? At least Germany learned their lesson. We never do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
50. This is something that fills me with rage!!!
How fucking DARE they remove Franklin Delano Roosevelt's image from the dime!! This yet another chapter of the repigs master plan to strike the name of Democratic presidents from memorials, infrastructure and now coinage!!!

I mentioned a while back how offended I was that the Navy named its last two aircraft carriers after two mediocre presidents while naming a mere destroyer after BOTH FDR and Eleanor. Franklin and Eleanor have done more for this country than every living repig presdient COMBINED (that includes Ford as well as that fucking criminal that presently occupies the WH), yet they continue to be insulted by these revisonist neocon pseudo-historians. Fuck them!


Long live the spirit of the New Deal!!! Long live the spirit of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasMexican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
51. Taking FDR off.
He was a bad ass president who kicked the Nazi's ass he deserves to be on our coinage.

I read on a post here that they should put him on the half dollar, I disagree I dont think we should take Kennedy off. Maybe we should get the Regan lovers to put him on the dollar or something so they wont mess with the rest of the coins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
53. Having either one of those clowns on currency is disgusting enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiobhanClancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
55. Taking FDR off
This makes me furious. Why can't they put him on the penny,or the quarter,if they must do this? Lincoln and Washington are already on currency. FDR is specifically tied to the dime,and no one but he belongs on it. I hope people aren't going to put up with this...I don't even think Ray-gun would like it...FDR was a big hero of his,in his younger days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
56. Both!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC