this Dean "Hot Anger" vs Kerry "Cold Anger" is really a hoot

All of this "Cold Anger" from Washington Democrats has led to the complete loss of power for our party.

And "cold anger" aside, why would I believe that a campaign as poorly run as Kerry's would have a prayer in the General election?


on edit: chg "power" to "party" at end of first sentence

that he has Dean's supporters figured out.

Eloriel

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

Also, once it reaches the multi-hundred response level, it becomes a little unwieldy.

whatever.

The only answer I've heard is, "well, he also named Carter and Clinton." Yes, fine... but James Baker was mentioned in the same breath. The same James Baker who coordinated the Republican FL recount assault in 2k. The same James Baker who is counsel for the Saudis against the 9/11 families.

To employ him in any capacity, in any Democratic administration is so fucking wrong!

of the Bush 1 Administration, as opposed to the unilateralists of THIS Administration. It was a swipe against junior and his inept administration. Too bad it flies right over people's heads.

He named Baker to swipe the unilateralists. Never mind his role in the stolen election in 2k, DENYING justice to victims of the 9/11 attacks.

A big "gotcha" to Cheney & Rumsfeld. Uh huh...

I think of cold sweats, and hesitant ineptitude. Not a flame, but thats the mental picture I get.

Funny how he sits around pontificating about how he's losing.

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator

:D Sorry, I couldn't resist. Great job ALL mods!

peace