Bush campaign video: When Angry Democrats Attack!

I just received an email from the Bush campaign, with this video showing the "angry Democrats".

http://www.georgewbush.com/angrydemocrats/

Hilarious! They show Dean yelling, Gephardt ranting about the "miserable failure", Kerry demanding "Regime change", and ends with "Support the President's agenda for a stronger, more prosperous America."

Dean has the best "angry man" takes, but this is obviously the main defenese of the Bush campaign, that we are nothing but angry Bush-haters, and have no positive agenda.

No matter which Dem we run, they are going to harp on this; all of them have repeatedly talked about how terrible Bush is, and they've apparently settled on this "don't vote for the Dems, they're haters" line.

Never mind that ALL of the Dems have presented excellent plans for rebuilding America. Sigh.

But check out the video, it's funny. Especially the soothing voice and background music at the end when Bush is shown. Makes you feel good all over.

I think its funny that they are already sending out the ads. Scared much?

His lying, his inept policies, his war, etc. I hate what he's doing to this country and the fact that our soldiers are dying because of him.

No apology from me- I'm angry and I hate the Bush* administration.

It's a meme that's going to work. Joe and Jane Mainstreet will fall for it just like they fell for Gore being a "serial liar".

I think most people already have their mind made up. The people that fall for that phoney shit already agrees with what hes doing.

After Dean gets the nomination, he'll get the chance to focus on his policies more.

And the first chance Dean gets to debate Shrub- he'll wipe the floor with him- THAT'S what they're afraid of!

The bush ads aren't gonna make a lick of difference for anyone. Which was kind of my point

but if it weren't this meme, it would be another. They are in the driver's seat, as incumbents.

Also I think a lot of people are angry, even Joe and Jane Mainstreet.

Since when are we "safe and prosperous" under Bush?

He is. They may be glad to know Democrats are saying so.

I heard numerous folks - not just democrats - express huge frustration with the craziness in DC and with the perceived lack of fight from the dems to try to stop the craziness.

I heard great speeches and commentaries, then people like Chris Matthews turn around and say "Where's the Dems?" The media has to report what Democrats are saying or people won't know. The Democrats were speaking, the media wasn't reporting. Just like Nancy Pelosi said a few months ago, they call press conferences and nobody shows up. Or the gossip column politics we get right now. Who said the "f" word. Clark said "move on". Dean is angry. The media quotes 5 words out of a 500 word speech and people eat it up like those are the important words in electing a President.

There was no decent media reporting before the war, there's no decent media reporting on our primaries, and there won't be any decent media reporting next year unless half the U.S. starts demanding it and stops buying into media driven, mass marketed campaigns.

prosperous america"... given that their fear tactics (to keep us supporting war in Iraq) have NOT made people feel safer... and many on mainstreet feel the opposite of more prosperous.

What I find amusing is how successfully the GOP used anger to take over the house in 1994. And now they claim the high road? Interesting...

He wants "Hard Core" Democrats and if they aren't angry then they haven't been paying attention. After the Primaries he will swing towards the center and lighten up some. He definitely knows how to win.

:puke:

That is the most fluffed up piece of crap I have ever seen.

he doesn't exist he'll go away.

It's an RNC ad. I am suprised they put it on Bush's site. Losers

would be (if the DNC had cajones), a clip of the Brooks Brothers riot highlighting the individuals and showing their connection to the Repub congressman, etc.

take advantage of the Brooks Bros.

Not many people ever found out about the story behind that, and it's very revealing.

Instead of actually looking at the reasons as to WHY Americans are angry, they dismiss the truth because it does not fit their agenda.

the World, A freakin JOKE.

This is their best shot?

Someone in the PR Room is gonna get bitchslapped around the ears real quick

"More Dirt More Dirt" thats about all they can think of. sheesh

A German official compares that same idiot to Hitler.

... if a group of clips could be assembled showing you-know-who saying some of his "immortal" Bushisms or choking on his pretzels or whatever. Heck, Democrats have a sense of humor. We laugh when something is funny.

How could you-know-who possibly refute it? By claiming to be serious, intelligent and reasonable?

I don't think so.

"while Democrats are attack, Bush is leading"

Oh yeah?

Does leading include a monthlong vacation every year and at least ten hours of sleep every night, not to mention a trip to the Ranch or Camp David every other week?

"On <date> the Bush campaign ran an advertisement decrying Dean, Gephardt, and Kerry as 'angry.' We are angry because we see the effects of President Bush's policies on America."
or something along those lines

and we're not gonna take it anymore...sayonara bush.

Democrats......dont be afraid of the anger...they are using that as a scare tactic...hoping we roll over like good lapdogs....anger is a good motivating force....we will use our anger constructively to defeat these thugs.

etc.

I think one of the best ads would be to take that Gov Bush* vs. pResident Bush* debate from The Daily Show because it shows how pResident * to be just the opposite of what he was preaching when governor.

That video is priceless.

If you haven't seen it, go here:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comedycentral.com%2Fmp%2Fplay.php%3Freposid%3D%2Fmultimedia%2Ftds%2Fstewart%2Fjon_7131.html

My guess would be...yes. I think the RNC has an extensive library of Dean performances with which to scare the bejesus out of middle America. One more reason Dean is such a lousy match for Bush.

glad they repeated Gep's quote. The more people hear the truth, the better. We must thank the GOP for helping out.

I hope they play it over-and-over during prime-time! Dean won't have to spend a penny in televsion advertiseing! This commercial looks like it was made by the DNC! Great stuff! :D

THey keep shooting themselves in the foot!

I think GOP anger is over-exposed in the American psyche. A lot of GOPers are just angry all of the time. When they show anger it doesn't really mean much.

Dems on the other hand are slow to anger. If Dems actually show anger, it is unusual. I think swing voters and even independant-minded conservatives are not likely to simply dismiss it. They are more likely to feel increased interest in the reasons behind the anger.

Backfire.

Anger is not going to win the white house for us, not matter how good it feels or how much we enjoy it. The public is fickle and more likely to say "well I didn't vote for x because he was just too mean" than to say "I didn't vote for x because I disagreed with his economic and/or foriegn policy."

People here keep acting like elections are about issues, and that's probably why democrats loose so much. Republicans know that elections aren't about issues - they are personality and popularity contests about which candidate can make individuals feel the most comfortable.

It would be nice if we could seek in a candidate with some good stances on issues through the backdoor, but issues don't win elections and neither does the "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore" approach.

The media will just say (at the appropriate time) that Dem X is just saying that because they hate Bush, not because the administration's policies are woefully wrong-minded.

I agree that anger is an issue that can be used against us if we do not respond. I would suggest a counter ad agreeing with the Repub ad:
"The Reps say the Democrats are angry. Yes, we are angry. We are angry because Mr. Bush has put our young soldiers in harm's way and hundreds have died because of his lies. We are angry that he has spent the largest surplus in history and has given us the largest deficits in history. We are angry at his arrogant displays and his PR politics. We are angry at his attempts to divide this nation. We are angry because we care about this nation."

Bush is the worst President we've ever had. If we don't criticize him and his policies, our campaign boils down to a shrug. We can't win by arguing over what's the best way to subjugate Iraq and the rest of the Islamic world, or how best to pay for trillion-dollar tax cuts for the rich. We have to come out against those things and others like them in the first place.

Likewise, Bush is a phenomenal liar. His dad lied a lot, and as for Reagan, you could always tell when he was lying because his lips were moving. But Bush is far-and-away the most audacious liar ever to disgrace the presidency. If we give him a pass on that, it leaves us without much to argue with, because his lies equate his policies with security, prosperity, peace, justice, and the American Way.

But we can't win just by calling Bush a liar and a failed president. We need to finesse this issue very carefully, and always combine condemnations of the Bush administration and its lies with substance about what needs to be said and done instead. Even then, the hostile media is likely to pick apart the sound bites and only show the negative stuff. If we're going to win, we have to teach the electorate to distrust the media.

"Support the President's agenda..." with the acoustic guitar in the background -- sounds like a "big brother mind control" track from a really, really hackneyed sci-fi movie. It's really scary how successful this adminstration seems to be with treating people like idiots.

or should I say losing touch. I guess when you have $200 million to blow, you can afford to make a few boners...

Are they actually going to air that?

and they should be angry, since no other Democrats are angry enough

Dean's voice in in some really scary registers there. That's not the kind of anger we need.

Who does it sound and look like? Hint: notice it is in black and white.

On edit: This is about as low as the GOP can go. Check out the black and white psyops on Dean.

Are you seeing what I am seeing? Are you as offended as I am?

This ad may be another RATS.

on Dems' Medicare plans; "RATS" was flashed for a frame or two on the screen--likely subliminal-programming attempt

I have a vague memory of that. As I recall the media let that story die pretty quick as in it was not connected to Bush or something.

I'm of all minds on this thread. The ad primarily goes at Dean, and I think the Hitlerian touches will, unfortunately, work. The Gephardt and Kerry "anger" was far more sedate, and might backfire - people might think "I've been THAT angry before. Is that the best they have?"
And, after all, Gephardt says that Bush is a miserable failure!

I also agree with the posters who notice that Clark is not included. I think the Republicans saw how Clark handled David Assman on FOX and are afraid of him.

B-)

Doesn't that black-and-white scene come across as an "Ein Volk" homage? I remember footage of Hitler gesticulating and literally spewing spittle with rage. Is that the image the Repubs are trying to bring to mind?

The Gephardt footage is in color. Why the black and white with Dean?

I find this fairly sickening if the GOP ad is doing what I think they are? Am I wrong about this?

The only candidate who deserves comparisons to Hitler is the illegally installed "incumbent" who has both historical links to the Third Reich and parallels in the actions of his Fraudministration.

The repugs have been demonizing the dems since Nixon got kicked out. When Bu$h Sr. took over, he was the one that started bashing liberals and people from other countries. Remember when Japan bashing was popular?

W is one of the most hateful humans on the planet. Unless you are part of his inner circle, you are worthless. W practices the politics of hate better than Hitler could have ever dreamed.

However, ads like this will hurt him a lot more than they will help him. I think the American people are waking up and get sick of W's bullshit.

what was going on and I saw this ad, I think it'd make me wonder what the Democrats are so "angry" about, then I'd do some research and become angry too. So, maybe this could backfire on them.

of dean not being angry. Oh yea this is a real great image of what America can expect from the next pResident of the United States, this guy with his finger on the trigger, works for me.


retyred in fla
“good night paul, wherever you are”
So I read this book

...have done to this country over the last three years, then you are either brainwashed, or in serious need of a mental health evaluation.

Why aren't they picking on the General, too? Nationally, he's been pretty entrenched in second place, and you can bet they read the polls, too...

Rove also has access to the internal polling. Oh to be a fly on the wall. They are looking at the General in the general and seeing things that make them wake up with cold sweats. I wonder if they are also focus testing attacking a four star hero and smelling the rank whiff of "back fire."

Irony is not their strong suit.

Hey, do you think this will help Dean? I saw the TV ad, and anyone disappointed with Bush seeing that ad will say, hey, the Democrats are angry and I'm angry too at Bush!

What do you think?

with a why Dems are angry.

Show footage of Bush making that stupid chimp face, actual numbers of all his time off since he took office, footage of him making the trifecta statement (with the WTC crumbling in the background) and footage of him at Christmas in 2001, saying "All in all it's been a fabulous year for Laura and myself" with background footage of WTC memorial shrines. Mission accomplished - with pictures of flag draped coffins. Show some homeless shelters, filled with working families.

Plenty of ammo waiting for us to pick it up.

Anger is good. Anger promotes change. Lets not be ashamed of the Dems who are actually standing up for democracy. By the way, does anyone know where I can find the full audio speech by Dean?

AMEN! Jerry Fallwell and Pat Robertson should not be setting the agenda for America.

Except for that last shot of Dean, the rest are just telling the truth. It's good they're helping us get our message out! Bush is not leading this country, he's a miserable failure and we need a regime change in Washington!! Thank you very very much!

yes indeed ...America is just starting to pay attention
to the diff candidates . We got the pukes attacking
now it time .. The base is riled , Unite us not is the
time to bring the country together .

Dean needs to respond to this with something like the following.

They call us angrey. But we are angrey becase the Republicans have wronged us, and wronged America. They wage an illigel war for Weponds of Mass distruction that do not exist. They run our government with an iorn fist. By mock are patristism, and call us cowereds and trators. And on TV, radio, and print, they declare that we should all be hanged for daring to speak out.

And not long ago, they mocked us for being whiners. They mocked us for our cowerdice. They mocked us becase we were "playing politics." Today, they mock us for our anger. Tomorow, they will feal that anger at the polls. As we hold THEM acountable for what they have done to our contry for the past 4 years.

Soothing voice:
"Tired of the pessimism and angry protest?"

<satire>
"So are we. That's why we developed Bushitol. This revolutionary new drug was developed by a joint consortium of Fortune 500 companies to take the strain out of living under a heartless, dictatorial regime.

Unlike street drugs or liquor that just provide temporary numbness, triple-action Bushitol works by attacking the conscience, logic, and memory centers of the brain. Once it knocks out those trouble spots, there's no possible way you'll be angry like these men.

Imagine your doe-eyed glee as you joyfully amble through a new 40 acre Wal-Mart, untroubled by pesky thoughts like, "Why do they hate us?" or "Why aren't I at work?" And you can forget about those faces of the fallen that keep you awake at night. Bushitol takes those faces and wraps them in a 40 gauge steel American flag!

<Doubtful customer>
"What about those other angry people? Won't their tirades just undo the effects of Bushitol?"

<Announcer>
No chance. After one dose of Bushitol, words like "miserable failure", "Bill of Rights", "election fraud" and "no-bid contracts" will be converted into meaningless jibberish deep inside the brain, before an emotional response can be generated. You'll be able to honestly say, "That's Greek to me! Thanks, Bushitol!"

Ask you doctor or pharmacist about Bushitol today. Or look for the vials labelled "Flu Shot" at your local clinic. But do it today won't you? We'd still like that energy bill to pass so we can get on with OUR prosperity!

COMING SOON:
BUSHITOL2000 and BUSHITOL911 Extra Strength!

in Cuckoo's Nest when they were handing out the drugs.

You can't say Republicans don't learn. If you recall Clinton's brilliant '95-96 ad campaign against "the Gingrich-Dole Congress," the clips were photoshopped. The images of Republicans were all black and white, slightly out of focus, and grainy. If I recall correctly, even the speed was adjusted to make them seem slightly slow. It all added up to a subliminally unpleasant visual image, courtesy of film editors.

The pubbies complained at the time that doctoring photos that way was a low blow, but that didn't stop the ads, which were highly effective. Looks like imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

This trend bothers me more than a little. Hollywood is getting very proficient at splicing real people and events into movies, which can dangerously blur the line between reality and fantasy. The DNC dabbled in the same game some months back when it ran animated cartoons of Bush & Co. on its website. While a cartoon is obviously a creative fiction, the technique still put invented words directly into an opponent's mouth. This kind of thing can get dangerous really fast.

There is plenty on the record with which to pound an opponent without inventing things. Our politics is foul enough already without making up quotes and doctoring photos to demonize opponents.

but once again, I can't think of any clark outtakes that would be vulnerable to that technique :) His anger is too classy

They ran in the last election with the "Angry White Male" now they make it sound like it's a horrible thing to be angry.

an attempt at holding on to only the worst of the knuckle draggers.

This letter was in today's LTEE in the Cincinnati Enquirer - but it must be talking about another ad. There has not been one positive letter about * in the letters for quite some time that I've read - all negative - which is pretty huge for Cincinnati. People are catching on - very slowly - but they are catching on.

Letter:

The recent Republican National Committee's TV commercial is as astounding as it is frightening. It seems they are cultivating a "with us or against us" mentality. The message urges the American voters to contact their elected officials to support a "preemptive self-defense" policy. Does this mean that those in opposition of this policy are un-American? Are only those who march in lock step with the administration worthy? Does disagreement equate with disloyalty?

History warns that "lock step" is not far from "goose step" and that "preemptive self-defense" is but a step away from warmongering.

I'm sure the voting public will know that the Dems learned that hate and anger from the republicans during Clinton's term. If not, then they are stupid. Repukes always rely on the stupid vote.

HA!

That's one of the first things that ATTRACTED me to Dean as a candidate!

But I'm not seeing any video. Am I doing something wrong?

Anger is taboo apparently. Can't we all just get along? Haven't today's Republicans become so PC-seeming in many respects?

Aren't the ad's supposed to have the candidate at the end say, "My name is ______ and I approve this commerical"? Where the hell is Dubya, the ad said its paid for by Bush-Cheney which means its his ad.

So, my question to the anyone that is familar with the changes made in the law last year is, is this ad legal without the disclaimer?

Inquiring minds want to know.

On the left hand side of the page is a menu one of the options is "I support President Bush because" Click it!

It looks like Dubya doesn't have any reasons to support him either!