Article: "Dean is Rove's Wet Dream"

From The Washington Dispatch

Should Republicans Help Nominate Howard Dean?
Exclusive commentary by CK Rairden

"Howard Dean is even more to Bush advisor Karl Rove. Dean is a Karl Rove wet dream. He is an anti-war liberal in a time when soccer moms have become security conscious."

http://www.washingtondispatch.com/printer_6309.shtml

The Washington Dispatch is not considered a legitimate news source at DU.

just like they've been doing for months. One of the other candidates needs to stand up and call a spade a spade. Dean is their Dream candidate. Of course Karl Rove could be caught holding a Dean fundraiser in a fake Mustache and the Dean campaign would call us paranoid.

This is so beyond requiring an elaborate conspiracy.

Never thought we had a too few liberal writers to
post from before...but seemingly the newer DU's
want to post rightwing stuff. I don't like it myself.

That's why he is proping up Dean.

The RWers want Dems think that they WANT to face Dean, so that we'll drop him. Just means they're VERY afraid of him.

which even the Dean campaign admitted they loved. All it did was rile up his cult and make him more LEGITIMATE cash

That's real constructive :eyes:

but I really think they are trying to use reverse psychology and smear tactics here. Dean is a centrist so will actually appeal to a fairly broad group of people.

I think the GOPers calling him a lib and saying they want to see him on the ballot is their way of saying he terrifies them because they have discovered that he is highly electable. (Honestly, the people they would be most afraid to see follow Bu$h into office are Sharpton and Kucinich, the true liberals in the pack.)

The Dlc cutting Dean down left and right is just another case of the "left" doing the work for the right.

I could've gone the rest of my life without ever thinking of Rove having a wet dream. Thanks...:puke:

did you spam this on, anyway?

please review the rules for posting a new thread in GD before posting a new thread in GD.

Thanks

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.