Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

bartcop does gore endorsement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 05:55 PM
Original message
bartcop does gore endorsement
go see =)

"Since Gore refused to fight after promising all democrats that he would, could Dean suffer a backlash since Gore, the "non-fighter," says Dean's the man for the job?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't buy"that Gore refused to fight.."
He fought it all the way to the Supreme Court. Where should he have gone from there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Frankly, it should have gone to the Legislature, per the Constitution.
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 06:03 PM by keopeli
Gore played softball, which may be the high road, but it's not the way to deal with thugs in your midst. The SCOTUS should never have considered the case. They should have deferred to the Congress. Gore should have stated this clearly. He capitulated, which was his right to do. But, he must live with that choice, which includes the fact that, in the face of adversity, he gave up.

Elections should never be "given up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. hmm i dunno
where was he anyways?

i remember is bush assembling his transition team while the counting was still going on.

but darned if i can say where al was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. to be fair, Al didn't require much of a transition team, while Bush*...
was planning to remake our whole system of government from an open democracy to...whatever it is now that they are hiding from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I think he means Gore didn't fight enough in the public arena.
The Supreme Court aside, the Gore campaign didn't have someone to counter James Baker, a man who pounded the Bush campaign line loud and often. Gore tried to sit it out and 'stay above' the mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yes they did...
Warren Christopher was the counter to Baker...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Christopher wasn't much of a counter...
... to Baker and the Brooks Brothers riot in the streets of Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Neither do I...
Granted it was a poor choice of legal strategy to persue overvotes only (David Boise to blame for that), but President Gore fought to the bitter end (when SCOTUS handed down its crooked decision). Remember, the media was already painting Gore as a "sore loserman." What else could he have done at that point?

It's pissing me off that some so-called Democrats are trashing President Gore this way... It's fucking sad!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Off topic
I like this graphic MUCH better! lol

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. not exactly or completely true
the "states righters" GOP/Bush gang went running to SCOTUS when they didn't like the decision of the state, i.e. the Florida Supreme Court which had okayed a statewide recount. Remember slimey James Baker's claim that his client, Bush, would be hurt by counting all the votes..

Gore blew it by not requesting a statewide recount from the get go. You must read Too Close to Call by Jeffrey Toobin. Gore wanted to be above the fray; he called off protesters for our side in Florida! Meanwhile the repukes went for the jugular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Al Gore had to abide by state law
State law said it had to be county by county and a statewide recount could not be requested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Really
After the Supreme Court, it was out of Gore's hands and into the hands of Congress, where Kerry, Lieberman and Edwards rolled over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gore put the interests of the country ahead of his own
he's doing the same thing now. He's trying to unite the party now, in order to keep it in good shape to beat Bush, in the interest of the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. How the heck does this unite the party? Pulleeze...
Gore just managed to antagonize a good percentage of the 80% of Dem voters who aren't supporting Dean. He kicked sand in a lot of faces - and I hope the party doesn't pay with its life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. listen to his speech
he goes out of his way NOT to antagonize the supporters of the other candidates.

Notice he says that when he dropped out he was going to do this for one of the candidates. Well he's doing it, and I think he's doing it in the best possible way, even though I don't like his choice very much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elcondor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. That's a little dramatic, don't you think?
I don't think Gore endorsing Dean is going to bring the end of the Democratic Party . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Cocoa, that's very high minded, and certainly a correct statement.
The problem is that the Repubs would never put the interest of the country before the interests of the Republican Party. That's because they believe that the Republican party IS our country and our government.

The truth is that our country and government are what we make it. We DO still have a voice, however muted it may be. In a presidential election, there should never be a capitulation. If a race is close, you just say it's close. You don't throw in the towel and say, I'm doing this so the country can be unified. Is that what we are now? Unified? I think not.

By your assertion, for the sake of the whole country, Gore gave up, allowing the events of 9/11 to be handled by a Texas Sherrif, allowing our tax system to be abused, allowing our surplus to be wasted, allowing our military to be sacrificed...it just doesn't make sense.

And, if i may, though it's true that noone could have predicted in 2000 that all of these things would happen with certainty, I knew that Bush would pursue this agenda and that his reactions were predictable in the face of adversity, which is the main reason I opposed his candidacy. It is our task to see these qualities in people before we elect them. By all accounts, everyone misjudged Bush*, even the Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. well, this is where we give credit where credit is due
he conceded to Bush on election night, and then called back and retracted the concession. A very extraordinary action, and then battled for a month down in Florida.

Because of that, I think it's fair to conclude that Gore was absolutely convinced that he simply could not possibly get the presidency back from Bush. Bush stole it, and that was it. It went to the Supreme Court, where does he go from there, to the streets? To the UN? The military?

Anyway, no discussion about Gore "giving up" is worth very much without any mention of what he did do, agree or disagree with how it ended up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. unite, my ass
his political instincts are not the best and injecting himself in the race at this point before the first primary, before the first vote only causes supporters of other candidates to dig in for the long haul. It doesn't unite crap.

I'm pissed BUT not because I'm for Clark. Rather because Gore has a lot of negatives for many in the general electorate (that's one big reason why the 2000 race was close enough to be stolen). Even among many Dems then, his support did not represent genuine enthusiasm for him but rather total antipathy toward Bush.

Dean was doing just FINE without him. In fact, Dean was on a roll (he nearly converted me with his FL and SC speeches this past weekend). Now his name will be linked with Gore and that means with Gore's perceived negatives (serial liar, insipid sigher, disorganized campaigner, wooden man with the tin ear ...). The pundits will morph this into a Gore v Bush referendum with the panderers going even further out of their way to support Bush.

Thus, Gore could actually HURT Dean. This is not a good move nor one that serves to unify. Unity and efforts thereto are most appropriate at the END of the primary season not before they have even begun.

I wish Dean the best and will ardently support him if he becomes the our nominee, but Gore should have shut the fuck up. He's 2 (?3) and zip for the presidency; he has listened to the wrong people, heeded the wrong advice (remember both Bill Daley and Holy Joe wanted to throw the towel in ..) he either does too little too late or too much too soon. Read Too Close to Call!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a sticky wicket for Bartcop
I heard they endorsed Kerry or Clark (can't recall which right now)...so how does this tireless champion for Al Gore now feel after he endorsed Dean?

Coming soon - Bartcop talks smack on Gore. Watch for it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. bart is so yesterday.
he begged us all to send cash so he could start his bartcop radio deal.
guess what. he sucks on the radio. and he rarely updates his website (check the dates for a week). when he does update the site, it's the same old 'tutu dems/ spineless dems/ gore didn't fight' crap.

bart used to be edgy and fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imhotep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I agree
I stopped going there about 6 months ago because its no longer funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. To me, it's obvious
Bartcop's a Clarkie. Fine by me --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hey I like Bartcop- but sometimes he's just a booze addled blogger...
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 06:12 PM by Patriot_Spear
I like BC- I really do; I check his site almost everyday- but the guy has issues and he can love & hate you in the same 10 minutes. Self-deprecating and petulant all on the same page- he's a study in contradictions.

But the Mother Humper is funny; one of the few people I read who makes me laugh at loud.

He can support who he wants- it's not changing my view.

I'll stick with Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. He's just pissed off that Clark didn't get Gore's golden seal of approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yep.
Anyone who reads BC for more than a week knows how volitile he can be.

It's just Bart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. Gore put the interests of the country ahead of his own???
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 06:47 PM by grasswire
I don't think so. He preserved his own future electibility by capitulating.

A man who revered democracy more than his own political career would have forced the Constitutional process to continue to the bitter end, in Congress.

If they're trying to effect a coup, make them take the reins of government publicly, visibly. Ride the process until the bitter end. Don't slink away. Don't sigh and laugh, as Gore did on December 13 when the members of the Congressional Black Caucus BEGGED for a senator to challenge the Florida vote.

He played into the bait of appearing "statesmanlike" and "gracious" in order to run again.

I felt betrayed then, and betrayed now.

(And for those who say he was avoiding civil war, I say this: sooner or later, we're going to have to confront the Pugs. Sooner or later, we're going to have to duke this out. Maybe it would have been better to do it in 2000 when our world was in better shape and our country's finances were sound than to do it in 2004? Hmm? THEY are not going to stop if Dean's elected. Bet the farm on that.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Closer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
28. Bartcop
is pointless and is not even worth discussing on this board.

His site sucks, his commentary ISN'T funny, and he has quickly dwindling support base.

Within the coming months, I very seriously doubt he will even HAVE a website anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC