Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the whores have their work cut out for them in 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:33 PM
Original message
the whores have their work cut out for them in 2004
The truth is just so obvious, everything that Bush has done is a failure. The worst terrorist attack in history, the worst economy since the Depression, quagmire in Iraq, failure in Afghanistan.

Plus, on top of that, conduct in office that is truly impeachable. It doesn't matter that he didn't get impeached, he really should have been. Lies and coverups. Total secrecy.

Plus, he's a total idiot, he proves it every time he appears anywhere or opens his mouth.

Of course they'll try to puff him up, but they are going to have to get real creative. Probably their best strategy is to avoid talking about Bush at all. But how long can they keep that up?

I'm looking forward to a surreal presidential campaign.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's OUR fault
for not capitalizing on these failures. Geez, Clinton would have a bad hair day and the repukes would demand an investigation! We have leakgate, a screwed-up foreign policy, corporations making policies, a "president" who lied to wage war, an international community that hates us, etc., etc., and our dems spend more time bashing candidates than shrub!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. that's not factually true
the dems have spent FAR more time thrashing Bush.

The press, on the other hand, focusses on the infighting.

This is the press's fault. They are really failing in their responsibilities, almost all of their criticism is in the form of reporting on the Dems' criticism. And they ignore most of the criticism, I hear tons of stuff on C-span that the dems say that never make it into the papers.

When Bob Schieffer asked Bob Graham about his saying Bush should be impeached, Graham said he should be, but it's academic because the republicans control Congress. But he told Schieffer, there's no reason the press shouldn't be writing about this, comparing the Bush standard to the Clinton standard, but they never do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm not saying the media
is blameless, but I've seen many times now our own democratic "leaders", if not outright bashing the candidates, then showing mild, lukewarm support for them. The only exception is Carville. Perhaps they want the repukes to underestimate us, I don't know. I just know I'm tired of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, I think you underestimate the Power of Pravda
especially when the people they are manipulating are utterly unaware, carry vestigal beliefes from the height of the American Media which are laughably out of date.

The Imperial Subjects of Amerika still carry the institutional memory of the 40s-70s, when Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin perverted medias spread lies, disinformation, and propaganda. As a result, the FCC drew up it's regulations based on what these monsters did, trying to set up a series of roadblocks so that it couldn't happen in the Old American Republic.

But of course it is no coincidence that the Busheviks have been working so hard to remove those regulations with the lame excuses that technology has rendered them obsolete.

But these regualtions were written with Human Truth in mind, and that transcends technology.

Anyway, to get back to the original point, the Imperial Subjects of Amerika have not yet realized that their media is only a handful of step above Old Soviet or Chniese media. Because mechanisms of Totalitarioan Control, under the Bushevik Model are "incentive-based", shall we say, instead of a result of direct forceful oppression, the Busheviks and their Whores are given further camoflauge.

Finally, the Imperial Subjects of Amerika rae the weakest and most pathetic generation perhaps ever to live. They (we) haven't desrved freedom in at least a decade so it is no surprise that finally we are losing it.

Power abhors a vacuum, you know, and it is only the vestigal scraps of the Consititution and Bill of Rights that prevents the Busheviks from going straight to Tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. true, but more people voted for Gore in 2000
back then, Bush's utter inadequacy was not as clear as it is now.

Also, he got the benefit of the doubt on his character and his promises. He was, incredibly, portrayed as the more moral and HONEST candidate. Can you believe this? I have a hard time getting my head around it.

Now there's no excuse for giving him the benefit of the doubt. If a voter does, they are doing some serious mental exercises, and if a pundit tries to make a case for Bush's honesty, they better be a master propagandist. I'm looking forward to, and dreading, seeing them do their work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Masterful Tom
Freedom of the press stolen without a fight. Democracy is hindged on a free, non-corrupt press. Totalitarianism bloosems under these conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's a miserable failure
All the have left is "Democrats are too angry!" and "we'll give you tax cuts!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. and gay marriage
UGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ha....Not waiting until 2004
All one needs to do is listen to the whores newest baby the "BOOMING ECONOMY!! They've been pimping it for weeks while they know the fact is that its total BS. I've been hearing more of this crap than about how well things are going in Iraq.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. faux successes
I think there's a lot of that. Bush's actions are automatically considered to be successes, just by the fact that Bush did them. Soft bigotry of low expectations, Bush gets credit for trying, regardless of how things turn out.

Their judgement of the Iraq situation is pre-ordained: it's a success no matter what.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC