Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White Rice Fried

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 10:05 AM
Original message
White Rice Fried
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A51224-2003Jul26?language=printer
By Dana Milbank and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, July 27, 2003; Page A01


Just weeks ago, Condoleezza Rice, President Bush's national security adviser, made a trip to the Middle East that was widely seen as advancing the peace process. There was speculation that she would be a likely choice for secretary of state, and hopes among Republicans that she could become governor of California and even, someday, president.

But she has since become enmeshed in the controversy over the administration's use of intelligence about Iraq's weapons in the run-up to war. She has been made to appear out of the loop by colleagues' claims that she did not read or recall vital pieces of intelligence. And she has made statements about U.S. intelligence on Iraq that have been contradicted by facts that later emerged.

The remarks by Rice and her associates raise two uncomfortable possibilities for the national security adviser. Either she missed or overlooked numerous warnings from intelligence agencies seeking to put caveats on claims about Iraq's nuclear weapons program, or she made public claims that she knew to be false.

Most prominent is her claim that the White House had not heard about CIA doubts about an allegation that Iraq sought uranium in Africa before the charge landed in Bush's State of the Union address on Jan. 28; in fact, her National Security Council staff received two memos doubting the claim and a phone call from CIA Director George J. Tenet months before the speech. Various other of Rice's public characterizations of intelligence documents and agencies' positions have been similarly cast into doubt.


...more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. condi rice - liar, incompetent, or both?
no matter how you slice it, condi must go. the longer she stays, the more of a drag she'll be on chimpy's rapidly-dwindling credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Condi is dragging down Chimpy's credibility ratings
She's trying to out-lie the liar. Wow! She's got her work cut out for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. is that even possible?
If so, good for her. Keep on truckin', Condi!

The lower that false credibility gets dragged, the better - it's going to have to be beyond blindingly obvious before a lot of Americans will wake up and smell what they've been shoveling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lastgasp Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Condi's Sunday morning guest spots have dwindled . . .
At least we can be thankful we don't have to listen to Rice on numerous Sunday morning talk shows anymore. Every week it used to be either her or Colin Powell ad nauseam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. she's contradicted herself each time
McLaughlin group this week played clips of a couple of her appearances......she's not a good liar and it's quite apparent she's in way over her head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I never understood the praise she got for being a Russian expert
We might as well have had a Canadian Affairs Expert. I mean, for fucks sake, Russia is an ally and any President with a modicum of intelligence, or a thimble full of savoir-faire could handle that relationship!

Oh, nevermind.



bush* is a national disgrace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Easily explained, IMO.
Her expertise is only useful when we consider that Russia is a major impediment for 'Western' control of South Asian energy resources (oil and natural gas). The most consistent 'foreign policy' theme of the Busholinis is corporatization/privatization and control of the national (populist) resources of energy-rich nations and territories through which such resources must be shipped/piped. These nations are in a Russian "sphere of influence".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just a puppet on a string
It's a shame that a woman has too take the heat for what the Cowboy in Chief has done. Look, she says nothing more than what her handler's have her say.

Ya know, it just makes me cry to think she'll never become governor of California. <grin>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not to be dancing on Bush's grave but
do I smell a wiff of Watergate here? First they went after the presidential advisers and staff, then cabinet members and finally the big prize, Richard Nixon, himself. Vice President Spiro Agnew had been forced to resign before this for taking bribes, but it is important to note that the members of Nixon's circle were being chipped away at one by one not only by Democrats but Republicans too.

Website:http://www.watergate.info/

Book: "All The President's Men" by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/results.asp?TTL=All+The+President%27s+Men&userid=2UN9ZQX7YJ&sourceid=00404021846022305516&bfdate=07%2D27%2D2003+12%3A23%3A06

If his own party is beginning to turn on him, starting with Condi Rice, stay tuned for presidential coverup opera and finally the grand impeachment finale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC