Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deleted message

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 09:39 AM
Original message
Poll question: Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. hurts for both
Dean voted against the war, Kerry talked as if he had voted against the war, they were both against the way postwar Iraq and the search for Saddam was being conducted, so this is bad for both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Dean did not have a vote to cast in regards to the war
he stated his position against going into the war without agreement
amongst allies, and without letting the inspectors complete the job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think this does anything. The insurgency will continue
I hope I'm wrong. I hope the bastards give up, go home, and our troops can come back to America ASAP. This might help Bush, but after the next 10 months it may not seem as important as current events.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. The attacks will continue
It will be seen as a hollow event in two months.

Indeed, as George W. God has said himself, Saddam was no longer an issue because his regime had been deposed and he was in hiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dean Didn't Know Whether Osama Should Be Tried In The Hague
he botched that question badly with Chris Matthews...

By extension... Saddam should also be tried in the Hague.

ANY tyrannt caught should be put on trial in the Hague for crimes against Humanity.

This helps bolster International Law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bush will never let Sadaam be tried at the
International Court because he doesn't countenance its authority. It will be in Iraq where his minions can control it. I have no idea how this affects the election. It is probably too early to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. I voted other
This will have no effect on Dean and Kerry will continue to drop.

How do you praise the Bush capture of Saddam while also attacking him. If this capture is so beneficial for the US, then Bush benefits not Kerry. IF it does not prove beneficial, the Bush suffers, and true anti-war candidates benefit.

Kerry is trying to be on both sides of this and it will not work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. the war is still wrong
the attacks will continue, blood spilled, $$ wasted and things still going awry at home.

I don't see how capturing Saddam vindicates the US for a war built on lies with the ulterior motive to usurp Iraqi oil.

The Bush Admin still lied and those who voted for the war based on lies were chumped OR went along to play it safe.

Then of course there's all those dead soldiers and innocent Iraqis.

But if you all want to believe this changes everything, enjoy. Reality will set in soon.

Lastly, I AM happy for those Iraqis who did believe Saddam invincible and possibly returning to power. I still believe it could have been done differently. Like with many thousand fewer dead bodies and tens of billions less $$.

Julie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC