A good outcome of Saddam's capture!

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003580992,00.html

Apparently he was directing attacks on our troops and we can now hope that witht he arrest of many of his top leaders the attacks will decrease.

he was NOT DIRECTING the attacks this comes from one of the Generals, Odierno

And unfortunately the Ba'ath party is not the only one involved in the attacks

You will see this morph into something similar to what the Brits faced after the great revolt of 1920 as the Nationalist and the Wahabis take hold

Our troops will be able to rest easy now knowing that that George W. Bush has denied them mail order viagra offers.

Honest!

For our troops sake, I hope it is true.

Anything that decreases the attacks is a positive development.

i think saddam and osama are gay lovers too, and martians are directing the insurgency. ;-)

and sorry if that was too harsh, i just try not to trust the tabloids too often. maybe i'm wrong this time though. :)

Most of its readers buy it more for sports and the ever popular Page 3 Girl. Today's a saucy Manchester lass!

i love my page 3 girls

Does anyone remember that bush gave an exclusive interview with The Sun when he visited England? Yes, the very same one with the naked lady on Page 3.

Murdoch is a RW shill with more money than, well, God. The Sun is a RW echo chamber.

HE WAS DIRECTING ATTACKS FROM A HOLE IN THE GROUND WITH NO ELECTRONICS. YES INDEED.

He had access to video production, so he had access to more than worms in his little hole!

He could also bend spoons with his mind.

please review the rules for posting a new thread in GD before posting a new thread in GD.

Thanks

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.