Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush with Diane Sawyer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
billyf65 Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:23 PM
Original message
Bush with Diane Sawyer
There is an exerpt from Diane Sawyer's interview with Bush in Drudge

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashab.htm

Here is my personal favorite line:

"...and I was at what they call Aspen, which is the presidential cabin, reading the book on Ben Franklin."

HAHAHAHA!

But...maybe it is true...

http://enotalone.com/books/0375806210.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome--I wonder what Diane "Deep Throat" Sawyer had to do to land
that interview.

And no, the reference to Deep Throat is not sexual, it's historical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyf65 Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sawyer
I actually read in The Note today that she had it scheduled prior to Saddam's capture. Good timing, I guess. And an agreement not to ask anything too tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, I'm sure there were a lot of restrictions placed on what she could
ask--don't want him to have to think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wasn't "WANTED, DEAD OR ALIVE"
for Bin Laden, or was it for Saddam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. sawyer is axing a HARD question!!!!!!!!!!!!
she quotes several instances of NO DOUBT about WMDs:

VP Cheney said "There is no DOUBT Saddam has weapons of mass destruction, not programs, not intent; there is no doubt he HAS (emphasis hers) weapons of mass destruction. Secretary Powell said a hundred to five hundred tons of chemical weapons, and now the inspectors say that there is no evidence of THESE weapons existing right now."

get this HORRID, cheezy, disingenous answer (how COULD he have had this in advance......the response is SO lame, I LOLed as he said it)

flapping his chicken wings as he says this, BTW, looking all over the place, clearly flustered, aggravated by the question......I taped it, that's why I'm getting these words verbatim:

"Look--there's no DOUBT that SH was a dangerous person; there's no DOUBT we had a body of evidence proving that, and there's no doubt that the president must act after 911 to make America a more secure country."

and you should have seen the smirks, shrugs, headbobs as he said that.......especially the self-satisfied one he ended this little spiel with....sort of like a "So THERE! How do you like me NOW?" look.

too freaking much.

whole interview is later tonight on ABC

gotta give Sawyer credit for that question, much as I really loathe her; she clearly got under his very very thin skin with that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. but, of course, Sawyer couldn't do a Russert on her, providing quotes like
this:

On March 30, 2003, in an appearance on ABC's `This Week', the Secretary of Defense stated: `We know where they are, they are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad.'

from her own fricking network, no less, she could've pulled that one.

and what about that timeline of lies, posted by somebody and repeated all over the place, inluding here......I'll see if I can find it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. bilmon's excellent list of WMD quotes
and this only goes to June:

Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
Dick Cheney
Speech to VFW National Convention
August 26, 2002

Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.
George W. Bush
Speech to UN General Assembly
September 12, 2002

If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world.
Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
December 2, 2002

We know for a fact that there are weapons there.
Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
January 9, 2003

Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.
George W. Bush
State of the Union Address
January 28, 2003

We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more.
Colin Powell
Remarks to UN Security Council
February 5, 2003

We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.
George W. Bush
Radio Address
February 8, 2003

If Iraq had disarmed itself, gotten rid of its weapons of mass destruction over the past 12 years, or over the last several months since (UN Resolution) 1441 was enacted, we would not be facing the crisis that we now have before us . . . But the suggestion that we are doing this because we want to go to every country in the Middle East and rearrange all of its pieces is not correct.
Colin Powell
Interview with Radio France International
February 28, 2003

So has the strategic decision been made to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the leadership in Baghdad? . . . I think our judgment has to be clearly not.
Colin Powell
Remarks to UN Security Council
March 7, 2003

Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.
George W. Bush
Address to the Nation
March 17, 2003

Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical particularly . . . all this will be made clear in the course of the operation, for whatever duration it takes.
Ari Fleisher
Press Briefing
March 21, 2003

There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. And . . . as this operation continues, those weapons will be identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who guard them.
Gen. Tommy Franks
Press Conference
March 22, 2003

I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction.
Defense Policy Board member Kenneth Adelman
Washington Post, p. A27
March 23, 2003

One of our top objectives is to find and destroy the WMD. There are a number of sites.
Pentagon Spokeswoman Victoria Clark
Press Briefing
March 22, 2003

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
Donald Rumsfeld
ABC Interview
March 30, 2003

Obviously the administration intends to publicize all the weapons of mass destruction U.S. forces find -- and there will be plenty.
Neocon scholar Robert Kagan
Washington Post op-ed
April 9, 2003

But make no mistake -- as I said earlier -- we have high confidence that they have weapons of mass destruction. That is what this war was about and it is about. And we have high confidence it will be found.
Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
April 10, 2003

We are learning more as we interrogate or have discussions with Iraqi scientists and people within the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed some, perhaps he dispersed some. And so we will find them.
George W. Bush
NBC Interview
April 24, 2003

There are people who in large measure have information that we need . . . so that we can track down the weapons of mass destruction in that country.
Donald Rumsfeld
Press Briefing
April 25, 2003

We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so.
George W. Bush
Remarks to Reporters
May 3, 2003

I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.
Colin Powell
Remarks to Reporters
May 4, 2003

We never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country.
Donald Rumsfeld
Fox News Interview
May 4, 2003

I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein -- because he had a weapons program.
George W. Bush
Remarks to Reporters
May 6, 2003

U.S. officials never expected that "we were going to open garages and find" weapons of mass destruction.
Condoleeza Rice
Reuters Interview
May 12, 2003

I just don't know whether it was all destroyed years ago -- I mean, there's no question that there were chemical weapons years ago -- whether they were destroyed right before the war, (or) whether they're still hidden.
Maj. Gen. David Petraeus, Commander 101st Airborne
Press Briefing
May 13, 2003

Before the war, there's no doubt in my mind that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical. I expected them to be found. I still expect them to be found.
Gen. Michael Hagee, Commandant of the Marine Corps
Interview with Reporters
May 21, 2003

Given time, given the number of prisoners now that we're interrogating, I'm confident that we're going to find weapons of mass destruction.

Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff
NBC Today Show interview
May 26, 2003

They may have had time to destroy them, and I don't know the answer.
Donald Rumsfeld
Remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations
May 27, 2003

For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction (as justification for invading Iraq) because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.
Paul Wolfowitz
Vanity Fair interview
May 28, 2003

It was a surprise to me then — it remains a surprise to me now — that we have not uncovered weapons, as you say, in some of the forward dispersal sites. Believe me, it's not for lack of trying. We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there.
Lt. Gen. James Conway, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force
Press Interview
May 30, 2003

Do I think we're going to find something? Yeah, I kind of do, because I think there's a lot of information out there."
Maj. Gen. Keith Dayton, Defense Intelligence Agency
Press Conference
May 30, 2003


http://billmon.org.v.sabren.com/archives/000172.html

and this one, linked from a site posted back in July by someone at DU, from Perle, the current biggest creep around, AFAIC

".....Perle added that "we are absolutely certain" that weapons of mass destruction are hidden in Iraq - Washington's motive for launching the offensive against Baghdad - but that it may take dozens of years to find them.

"'We don't know where to look for them and we never did know where to look for them,' he admitted.

Asked by a reporter when he thought the evidence of those weapons may be found, Perle joked: 'I hope this will take less than 200 years.'
"
http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=6490

too bad Sawyer wasn't serious about this; she could've made him go completely APE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I saw that too.
Notice how he just about SHOUTED that response? As if somehow saying it louder, makes it more true.

Why didn't Bush just make a case to go to war to take SH out? Why use a bunch of potential lies to make a case? SH submitted a 12,000 page detailed analysis on his WMD...of which 75% was redacted by the US. What was in that? The evidence proving where Saddam got it and how it was disposed of?

If there was no basis to invade and occupy, then I think this war was a deflection and distraction from the investigation of 9/11 and this pResident's complicity in letting it happen.

He deserves impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did her head ever come up from his lap?
Enquiring minds want to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. once, partially, anyway, and he was MAD`
see post number 5 here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm glad I wasn't eating dinner when he said he was reading a book...
about Ben Franklin! This guy practically brags that he's illiterate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. my wife always wants to watch ABC
but I can hardly stand it anymore. Especially Diane and Charlie Gibson. Nothing but entertainers, and lousy entertainers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Rarely is the question asked
for all you doubters out there, here's the proof he was reading a book:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushbookupsidedown.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC