Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Iraqi People" will decide this, "The Iraqi People" that,...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:06 AM
Original message
"The Iraqi People" will decide this, "The Iraqi People" that,...
Could someone tell me how the pResident and the press can so freely refer to the will of "The Iraqi People" without an election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The "Iraqi People" for the Busites...
...wear suits and ties, haven't lived in Iraq in forty or so years and speak Arabic with an English accent; that's the only "Iraqi People" who count with this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, "The Iraqi People" = "Chalabi"
Edited on Wed Dec-17-03 08:59 AM by GiovanniC
For example, when Bush says that Saddam's fate will be decided by "the Iraqi People", he means the Iraqi people who haven't been Iraqis since they were teenagers. Or the Kurdish Iraqi people, or the Shiite Iraqi people. You know that he certainly has no intention of Saddam's fate being determined by the Sunnis, or the Iraqi people who hail, for example, from Tikrit or Fallujah (where Saddam remains relatively popular).

In other words, "Saddam's fate will be decided by the Iraqi people {that we choose}. He will be tried by Iraqis {that are hand-picked by us}."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Or the fact that the Iraqis have made it quite clear
that they want the US military occupation force to leave?

Why the hell are we there? No wmds, the great and powerful Saddam evil incarnate of the hour, living in squalor while the US military camps out in palaces and the Iraqis are fortunate if they have electricity and running water.
Why they hell are we there, beliving some garbage about liberating the Iraqis while they attack us - who they are trying to liberate themselves from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Free elections seem to be the chief opposition demand...
One demand is now uniting nearly all Iraqis, from armed resisters to trade unionists to Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. Elections! And it is the one demand to which the US has refused to agree, because it has accurately assessed the likely result. That is also why it swiftly moved to stop elections of city mayors and why, a few weeks ago, it sacked the elected dean of Baghdad university after his outspoken criticisms of the occupation authorities.


The Guardian: Resistance to occupation will grow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do you recall how Ari Fleischer always attributed feelings to you?
Ari would always say things like "The American People are tired of politics as usual in Washington, and they support President Bush."

or

"The American People are concerned about the balsa gliders of death that Saddam could launch at us within 45 minutes, and they support the President".

And so on.

So it's no big stretch to presume to speak for a people who have no power and no voice, when you already claim to speak for a people who do have a voice but don't raise it in opposition to their thuggery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's one of the things that's been bugging me of late...
The idea that appointed (as opposed to fairly elected) representatives may soon be construed to represent my will. Kind of like the appointed governors of the King George III days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC