Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seattle Media Whore Slimes Jim McDermott and Howard Dean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JailBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:16 AM
Original message
Seattle Media Whore Slimes Jim McDermott and Howard Dean
Wow, I'm beginning to wonder if the Seattle Post-Intelligencer will join its inbred sibling, the Seattle Times, in endorsing George W. Bush next fall.

P-I columnist Robert Jamieson really dumped on "Baghdad Jim" McDermott in "McDuhmott's comments were way off-base"
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/153307_watered.html Jamieson blasted McDermott for shooting from the hip without the benefit of facts - a charge that might be partially true. But then Jamieson turns around and writes this crap:

"McDermott said something stupid -- something debunked by the facts as we know them.

"In nabbing Saddam, U.S. military leaders had to overcome Iraqi tradition that values tribal loyalties above all else; a fellow Iraqi had to narc on the ex-dictator. That takes time -- not, as Baghdad Jim suggests, political timing."

OK, I'll bite - what are the "facts as we know them"? Was Jamieson in Iraq to witness Saddam Hussein's capture, or is he accepting the word of George W. Bush as (giggle) "facts"?

One has to wonder if McDermott was even the Seattle P-I's primary target. Jamieson closes with this smelly thought:

"These days McDermott isn't alone in his embarrassing shows of intellectual flatulence.

"Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean not long ago asserted that Bush might have had advance warning of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Dean's words -- unsubstantiated, inflammatory and hurtful -- are unbecoming of a man who would be president."

Sheez, why mince words? Robert Jamieson is just another giant media fart brought to you by the originator of "yellow journalism," the Hearst empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Speak no evil of King George.
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 04:31 AM by aquart
I am intrigued by the notion that someone has detected emotion in George other than smug superiority and petty spite.

It would be a gift to humanity if he could provide evidence of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonDeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are they afraid Democrats are going to make bush cry?
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 04:49 AM by JasonDeter
making hurtful possibility of facts about the warmonger bush? Besides, it wasn't Democrats who said they were starting a war propaganda office in the pentagon, that would be rummy. I don't believe one word that comes out of this corrupt bush administration.

on edit, what was the name of that war propaganda office rummy created? we should email the flacid media and remind them they're not supposed to be part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the frightening/infuriating part...
Jameson is one of that paper's leading liberal writers.

:-(

(Although it ought to be pretty embarrassing to be writing "'Baghdad Jim' McDermott has lost his mind" for suggesting that the capture of Saddam was staged the same day news emerges that, well, the capture of Saddam may have been staged...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. McDermott
Might mention he won the last election by 70+% didn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is one man, not a whole paper
the PI had an article that was laudatory via Dean as well.

Not everything is an institutional conspiracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC