If you could only pick one which would it be?

Bandit

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:08 PM
Original message

If you could only pick one which would it be?

Rush Limbaugh doing hard time for a minimum of ten years or Bush* losing in 2004. It is a really really hard choice for me. I think Rush is probably more dangerous than Bush*. Without rush Bush* would never have been elected in the first place. I would vote for Rush going to prison.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

mikehiggins

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:11 PM
Response to Original message

1. Get rid of Bush

If Clark gets into office he can secretly declare Rush an enemy combatant and ship him off to Guantanamo. No one will ever know what happened to him. God bless the Patriot Act!

Karma, karma, karma, karma, karma chameleon...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

oostevo

(293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:12 PM
Response to Original message

2. Yeah, but ...

While Bush is a murderous, unelected ruler who endangers the world, Rush did something that no one should go to jail for (the drug use, not the other stuff), and is only a danger to himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LuminousX

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2

5. I fully agree with this, drug addiction is a disease, not a crime

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Bandit

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2

7. I was not concerned with any particular crime

I agree nobody should go to jail for drugs but I'm also sure Rush is a Felon in many many ways and just hasn't been caught. My question does not say what crime he should be jailed for only if you would like to see him behind bars for ten years or so. Rush is indeed a danger to America and unless you don't believe in the power of Propaganda I find it hard to understand how you can say he is no danger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cleita

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:12 PM
Response to Original message

3. How about Bush doing life for war crimes in a cell with

Limbaugh doing time for drugs. Two birds. One stone?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Individualist

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3

4. That's my choice as well n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

citizen snips

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:21 PM
Response to Original message

6. Good question.

That is a hard one I cannot pick one.:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

SlavesandBulldozers

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 04:39 PM
Response to Original message

8. Are you kidding me

watching Rush being dragged through the media-mill is just as entertaining as watching him dragged off in shackles. He's had his wings clipped.

We need a new President, moreso than pigboy in prison. Although what a day it would be to have both. Now if we can just find a tape of Shawn Hannity at a Turkish bath. . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Crunchy Frog

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 05:32 PM
Response to Original message

9. I'd pick *Bush losing in 2004

Unfortunately there's plenty more where Rush came from. The only real solution to the Rush problem is to break up the media monopolies so that other points of view actually have a voice that ordinary people can access. I hope that this is an issue that a Dem president would try to address.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

West Coast Democrat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message

10. Bush* Losing in 2004

no contest

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Beaker

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-23-03 06:19 PM
Response to Original message

11. Rush would be replaced by Sean Hannity-

so what would be the gain?
Having Bush lose, and then get to listen to rush's arteries bulge for the next 8-12 years over President Clark and his successor would be a real treat. I'd proabably even tune in once in a while.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:47 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.