Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV: Washington DUer's I am not a programmer....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 09:52 PM
Original message
BBV: Washington DUer's I am not a programmer....
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 09:58 PM by God_bush_n_cheney
and I don't play one on TV. It does seem ironic that a "cryptography" company cannot secure it's own network. It is unfortunate that their system was "hacked" and I would never advocate for this type of action. But, it does demonstarate how vigilant we must be in the care of our vote.

I would hope that since Vote Here has admitted there is a problem with their "cryptography", they would recall any and all products from the market. If the security of that system has been breached then "Houston, we have a problem".

Mr Adler of Vote Here has promised to reveal his companies source code. Perhaps now is a good time Mr Adler. I am sure there are many computer experts willing to help you vet your software. As for me, I will be pushing even harder for a paper ballot. It is the only way we can really be sure that our vote is counted correctly.

VoteHere is was sued by its former engineer, Dan Spillane, for wrongfully firing him in retaliation to his repeated warnings of potential defects in voting software applications and in the certification process. Perhaps we are seeing the results of unheeded warnings.

On the Mike Webb show...Bob Terwilliger of Snohomish county admitted to having one of his programmers install a "patch" on the Sequoia/Vote Here system. Was this patch certified? Was it part of the files lost to a "hacker"? We should be demanding an audit in this state immediately to determine exactly how big the problem is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. If anyone can secure its own network...
...it should be a cryptography company. Unless there is some arcane reason they do NOT want to secure it.

I am certain you have already figured that one out for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Indeed...
perhaps to allow someone to enter and change votes. But they wouldn't do that...would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Naaaaahhhhh!!!
Or would they, if it was to the advantage of someone they wanted to win...and to whom they had donated $$$$????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. BTW when I say hacker I am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. many alledgedly 'secure' networks are CRACKED all the time.
most companies don't like to talk about it... especially if they are a 'security' company.

i don't know the background on this story well but my initial reaction is that a 'security' company getting cracked is not outside the realm of possibility and since there are no good stats on these things - corporations getting cracked - it is really hard to say.

remember locks are only for honest folks and they can ALL be gotton around and there is no defense against insecure passwords or even secure ones once they fall in the wrong hands.

anyways, glad to hear that you are still fighting the good fight :toast:

peace

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. OK - so I *WORK* for an Internet security company
Having ANYTHING to do with security automatically makes you a target. EVERYONE gets hacked, despite the best of measures. I'm truly sorry this happened to these guys, better for them to have a wakeup call now than during an election.

Should they have had better security? Yes. But then so should every other company that is compromised or hit by a virus/Trojan horse/worm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. The whole electronic
"voting" thing is a transparent (but VERY unfunny) joke. Wasn't the method also chosen as Fortune magazines worst technology of 2003. Why is it that so many election officials seem so beholden to the frighteningly rightwing companies that make them rather than the People they are supposed to be working for. I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. And a bigger question is:
Who is this hacker, "El Barto"?

On the Mike Webb show...Bob Terwilliger of Snohomish county admitted to having one of his programmers install a "patch" on the Sequoia/Vote Here system. Was this patch certified? Was it part of the files lost to a "hacker"? We should be demanding an audit in this state immediately to determine exactly how big the problem is.

:hi: Sorry, just being :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC