|
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 09:58 PM by God_bush_n_cheney
and I don't play one on TV. It does seem ironic that a "cryptography" company cannot secure it's own network. It is unfortunate that their system was "hacked" and I would never advocate for this type of action. But, it does demonstarate how vigilant we must be in the care of our vote.
I would hope that since Vote Here has admitted there is a problem with their "cryptography", they would recall any and all products from the market. If the security of that system has been breached then "Houston, we have a problem".
Mr Adler of Vote Here has promised to reveal his companies source code. Perhaps now is a good time Mr Adler. I am sure there are many computer experts willing to help you vet your software. As for me, I will be pushing even harder for a paper ballot. It is the only way we can really be sure that our vote is counted correctly.
VoteHere is was sued by its former engineer, Dan Spillane, for wrongfully firing him in retaliation to his repeated warnings of potential defects in voting software applications and in the certification process. Perhaps we are seeing the results of unheeded warnings.
On the Mike Webb show...Bob Terwilliger of Snohomish county admitted to having one of his programmers install a "patch" on the Sequoia/Vote Here system. Was this patch certified? Was it part of the files lost to a "hacker"? We should be demanding an audit in this state immediately to determine exactly how big the problem is.
|