Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Reserve unit wants homemade armor for Iraq duty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 06:43 AM
Original message
Army Reserve unit wants homemade armor for Iraq duty
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 06:49 AM by KeepItReal
"Army policy generally prohibits troops from using equipment that has not been tested and approved by the military.

But fearing roadside bombs and snipers, the 428th Transportation Company turned to local businessmen to fund and fabricate special steel plates for their five-ton trucks and Humvees, which have thin metal floorboards and, in some cases, a canvas covering for doors."

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-aarmor30dec30,0,5723748.story?coll=sfla-news-nationworld

Unless it makes their trucks and Humvees too heavy to carry in transport aircraft (which it probably won't) or perform as they should, the Army should let this unit put more armor on their vehicles.

Pretty neat the way also got local businesses to fund it and fabricate the armor. Way to go troops!

Now watch the DoD say "Hell No" to their Reservists' request to add homemade armor and give a fat government contract (funded by taxpayers) to some Bush & Co. booster to do the exact same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rep. Ike Skelton
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 07:59 AM by soup
from the article:

Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri, the House Armed Services Committee's senior Democrat, sent a letter Monday urging Acting Secretary of the Army Les Brownlee to encourage the Army to "give every consideration to the efforts of the 428th."

"The Army should commend the soldiers of the 428th Transportation Company for their innovation and old fashioned American ingenuity," Skelton wrote.


I was going to send him an e-mail thanking him, but he only accepts messages from residents of his district.

Found this at his website, wonder if they've had any response from Rumsfeld:


Thursday, November 6, 2003

Reps. Lucas and Skelton Call on Rumsfeld to Investigate Treatment of Wounded Guard and Reserve Members

Washington, D.C. - Rep. Ken Lucas and Rep. Ike Skelton were joined by 130 Democratic Members of Congress in calling for an investigation into media reports that detail instances of hundreds of sick and wounded members of the National Guard and Reserve who are being housed in poor conditions, without indoor toilets, and receiving second-rate medical care.

"We write to convey our surprise and disappointment over recent press reports describing substandard living conditions and deplorable treatment for hundreds of sick and wounded members of the Army National Guard and Reserve," Lucas, Skelton and their colleagues said in a letter to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. "We believe that an immediate investigation is warranted, and if the facts portrayed in the media are even half true, corrective action from the highest levels of the Department should immediately ensue."
http://www.house.gov/skelton/pr031106.htm


Here's a little more on the armor-

>snip<
A spokeswoman at Fort Riley, Kan., where the Missouri-based troops are preparing to depart for Iraq, said the unit will be able to take the steel with them, but that the Central Command will decide later whether it can be used.
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_EXTRA_ARMOR?SITE=DCTMS&SECTION=HOME

and

>snip<
The soldiers got a local funeral home director active in community affairs to pay the roughly $4,000 tab for 13,000 pounds of one-quarter inch steel. Industrial Enterprises Inc. donated the fabricating work, valued at nearly another $4,000, so the steel could be fitted under vehicle floorboards and on the inside of doors.

The soldiers drove off in convoy Dec. 12 for Fort Riley, Kan., planning to fasten the specially made steel to their vehicles when they got to Iraq.

>snip<
Tallman and spokesmen at several Army bases said they were unaware of any other units trying to craft their own armor before leaving for Iraq. But Tallman said the Army had discouraged several families of individual soldiers from trying to obtain their own bulletproof vests, citing the same reason for Army testing of equipment.

Kirkweg said the Missouri soldiers didn't have time to wait weeks, months or years for the Army to test and approve a steel-plating project that he could complete in three days.

"We thought this is a very important project here - we're talking about possibility of saving people's lives," he said. "So without hesitation we went ahead and proceeded with the thing."

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_armor_121903,00.html


I really oppose this invasion and occupation, but if they have to be there, they deserve to be kept as safe as possible.

edited for spacing - sorry about how this all seems to run together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSR40004 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. The problem is..
The humvee isn't an armored vehicle, it's not made to with stand a RPG attack and adding all the metal you want won't make it so. These guys need new vehicles made to withstand RPG's, can you say new billion dollar contract?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not going to even pretend to know
anything about military equipment - because I don't.

Seems to me, though, I'd feel a little safer having a sheet of metal between my body and a bullet than a piece of canvas.

Then again, if we just hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place.... *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, it is
The windshield is bullet resistant up to .45 ACP and the body panels of a hard sided HMMWV are kevlar.

The up-armored version is a tank on wheels:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Do you know (please forgive my ignorance)
anything about the weight of that thing? Was it retro-fitted or 'fresh off the showroom floor'?

One article cited above had this to say about adding the sheeting-

The Army's concern, Tallman said, is that unapproved steel-plating could somehow cripple the vehicles or cause them not to perform the way they were designed. For example, a Humvee armor kit recently tested at the Army's Aberdeen (Md.) Proving Ground was so heavy that it caused the vehicle to break, he said.
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_armor_121903,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You see, the problem with the HMMWV is...
is a piece of absolute garbage. As a person who lived in them for 6 years, I can tell you that it's a maintenance nightmare, underpowered, and not very agile. Sure, it can slug its way through 4 feet of mud, but it's lack of speed and agility are a huge liability in tight spaces such as Bagdhad alleyways and such. (The thing is over 7 feet wide)

Now, the test at Aberdeen, you have to realize, may be a little misleading. It is their mission in life at Aberdeen to break things. They shoot things, drive them over landmines, burn em, etc. to find the actual limitations of a piece of equipment.

I do think that some steel sheeting in strategic locations would help, though...like on the door panels and the floorboards (these have to be extremely well fastened, otherwise the plate could become a projectile if the vehicle drives over any ordnance).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. thank you for your patience.
I learned something this morning. (love when that happens)

My 20 yr old son's best friend is doing desert patrol in Iraq, so there is a personal interest in this. They were in on Christmas day, and we got a phone call from him. Hearing his voice was the best Christmas gift we received.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's great. I'm happy to know he's OK.
There's on old adage that kind of hammers home these points

"Remember, your equipment was made by the lowest bidder."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. It also contains the worst engine in the world
The ungodly GM 6.2-liter diesel engine was created by Oldsmobile for use in its cars. It's a rotten car engine and an even worse truck one. In the 209th we had a "CUCV Engine Blowing Contest." Whoever blew the most engines just driving the truck around Seoul would win a case of OB Heineken. I thought I had it with three until Little John (whose name was really John Little) threw a rod on two different engines within three days of Christmas.

And Little John drove like he had a raw egg between his foot and the gas pedal.

Anyway, this engine is in the HMMWV. Let's see...the engine has 135 horsepower and less torque--usually diesels have lots of torque, but not this one. We were told to never, ever get water on the engine, and it's not an electronic engine. ("Electronic engine" on a diesel means electronic fuel injection; in old engines it's mechanical.) I can attest to the veracity of this; we drove one through a big mudhole during Team Spirit 85, got water on the engine and it never worked again.

My favorite part of the HMMWV is the hood. (Favorite as in "George W. Bush is my favorite Republican.") It's unreinforced fiberglass and hinged in front. Pick it up from only one side and it splits. Gee, wouldn't it have been a good idea to mold a piece of angle iron across the inside of this? Yeah, but that would have added twenty bucks to the price of the hood. It has an aluminum body and the official Army primer won't stick to aluminum. (Hint to GI members: go to the local Sikkens car paint dealer and get yourself a little can of Autosurfacer 940HS. Peel the existing paint off, prime your HMMWV with that and the cheap-ass paint the Army passes out won't fall off your vehicle.)

The Army received four vehicles to test to be the possible "Hummer." They chose the worst one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh, yeah...the thing
in its BASIC configuration weighs over 5000 pounds.

Check out Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. fas.org
love that place. It's better than an ALMANAC. ( - waiting for the knock on the door now - )

thanks for the info, Superfly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Pleasure was all mine.
Have a good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSR40004 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. You do know the differance between a RPG and a 45acp..
Trust me very few people are getting wounded with 1911's, its the RPG's and land mines that are getting our troops. And they pack alot more power then the .45 acp. I believe the humvee is rated to be 762 resistant which means it doesn't even stop machine gun ammo. It's lightly armored at best and it's sure as heck no tank on wheels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Re-read what I posted
the "up-armored" HMMWV is very heavily armored. I was at a test in White Sands in 1997 when they drove that version over a landmine. The engine compartment was completely removed from the vehicle whereas the crew cab was largly intact. The occupants would have been injured (probably broken ankles), but alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well, the DumbSon will provide them with cardboard turkey
to make them feel better. And, tell them that they're doing a swell job, and for the Iraqi's to "bring 'em on."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC