In how many countries are radical Islamists waging war?

Just today they burned 18 schools in Thailand. How many nations are they conducted violent campaigns? We always here about the major theaters of the international Islamofascist campaign, but what is the total number?

What on earth is "fascist" about it? Are there a bunch of muslim multinational corporations I'm not familiar with?

Aside from the corporatization aspect, Islamism resembles fascism. In place of race and nationalization Islamism subsitutes religion and nebulous transnational identities.

Nice try. I didn't say all Muslims. I was specifically referring to radical Islamists, who are a small fraction of Islamists, who are a small fraction of the Muslim population.

and you had better start checking your facts.

:)

Fox News? :shrug:

Its kinda peculiar that people really never batted an eye at
Protestants and Catholics killing each other in Northern Ireland...
but when muslims fight against prejudice and descriminiation they
get branded with such idiotic terms.

Is that a result of American policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict too?

But we are in a war against Islamofacists.

Hopefully, the Democratic president will do a better job than Bush at fighting them.

They are engaged in a worldwide fight to spread their ideology--by force. I have heard that they are engaged in war and/or terrorism in approximately two dozen countries. I posted this thread to ascertain the exact number of nations they are wreaking havoc in.

....you posted this thread to defame Muslims by linking Islam to terrorism. Do carry on though, this should be enlightening. :eyes:

Do you think we shouldn't post about Nazism because it links whites to racism?

where the hell are you getting your vocabulary? Rush Limbaugh?
You are way out of line. Literally, you are accusing ALL muslims
of wrong doings by a few radicals. So, I guess the world is right
in thinking that ALL Americans are imperialists and oil grabbers,
right? Generalizations have a nasty way of getting back at you.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=islamism

3 entries found for islamism.
Is·lam·ism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (s-lämzm, z-, sl-, z-)
n.
An Islamic revivalist movement, often characterized by moral conservatism, literalism, and the attempt to implement Islamic values in all spheres of life.
The religious faith, principles, or cause of Islam.

Literally, you are accusing ALL muslims of wrong doings by a few radicals.

No, the poster quite specifically did not indicate that he/she was referring to 'all' Muslims.

...character assassination, Character Assassin. ;)

Islamism is an ideology that seeks to impose a theocratic, Taliban-style, authoritarian government.

So would you object to the use of the phrase "white supremacy"?

any imposition of an ideology or "way of life" by one people onto
another is WRONG. And we, as a nation, are WRONG by the mere
act of having illegally invaded a sovereign nation.
So...who is clean of sin, eh?

If you wish to attack Bush's foreign policy please do so in another thread.

Er, well, if you can find any stories on that violence anywhere. They weren't on TV. :)

Fix a nice cup of chamomile tea, put on a little Ustad Sultan, maybe a bubble bath...

Here is a link to a good analysis of terrorist activity in 2002:

http://www.emergency.com/2003/ERRI_2003_Ann.pdf

It demonstrates that Islamist terror is a global phenomenon and occurs in Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, South America, Australia ... really, everywhere.

Here is another useful report, by the State Department:

http://www.usis.usemb.se/terror/rpt2002/index.html

There are those that will try to stop you from having this discussion and asking questions by smearing you as a bigot. Don't let them get away with it. This is a discussion that must be had. The fight against Islamism is every bit as important as the fight against Naziism was and the poisonous Islamist ideology does not deserve deference merely because it seeks to cloak its venom with religion.

I agree with you completely. Those that accord deference to radial Islamism play right into the hands of right-wing attacks that liberals are anti-American and soft on national security.

How many e-mail boxes has this thread reached thus far? :scared:

If the Democratic party becomes the defenders of "Islamism" b/c:

1) They're hatred of Bush overshadows reality,

2) They are so afriad of being called "racist" they don't see the facts straight,

3) They are too ignorant to know the difference between "Islam" and "Islamism"

then we are in lots of trouble.

Again, I am in complete agreement with you.

Let us continue to stand strong on national security issues. Let us not allow the right-wing to hijack patriotism and national defense issues. Some DU'ers do a great disservice to the liberal cause when they defend Islamism, terrorism, and people like Saddam and Bin Laden...

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Nigeria is having terrible troubles.

In Sudan the Black Christian south is being depopulated by the Civil War's aftermath. Whole villages are devoid of men who have been either wiped out or taken into slavery by the Islamist forces of the north.

Many people automatically blame the US for any fights, but it's hard to see how it's Bush's fault in Sudan or Nigeria, although I'm sure someone will try.

The Philippines is facing an Islamist rebellion. Indonesia is fighting more moderate Islamists versus radical ones. Almost all the former Soviet 'Stan' nations are suffering from Islamist terrorism, as is Russia. Of course India has been suffering terrorism for generations.

France has seen a horrible rise in anti-semitism, including many synogogue bombings.

This is a world-wide phenomenon and sometimes I think it's just the continuation of a march that's been going on for 600 years. I wonder in my more depressed moods if 200 years from now we will truly be part of the Dar Es Salaam, the House of Peace, in an Islamic World.
Progressive politics would sure be a lot different in that world.

On the other hand, I'm a big Harry Turtledove fan and spend too much time trying to speculate into alternative futures.

1. If you start a thread in the General Discussion forum, you must present your opinion in a manner that is not inflammatory, which respects differences in opinion, and which is likely to lead to respectful discussion rather than flaming. Some examples of things which should generally be avoided are: unnecessarily hot rhetoric, nicknames for prominent Democrats or their supporters, broad-brush statements about groups of people, single-sentence "drive-by" thread topics, etc.

Thanks
DU Moderator