Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alice in Chains - Grunge or Metal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
leftist_rebel1569 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:03 PM
Original message
Poll question: Alice in Chains - Grunge or Metal?
This was the topic of debate amongst me and my friends a while back...I say they're a grunge band because they come out of Seattle around the same time the other grunge bands came out and they pretty much look and sound like a grunge band, although most of my friends classified them as metal. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Grunge...is what

Grunge was metal and punk inspired.

AIC were progressive and most likely many would say grunge, but I would say progressive metal in the vein that Faith No More, Peppers, and Soundgarden were taking metal in the early 1990s...

The real kicker is Cantrell's guitar playing. No grunge players play like him. JC is completely a metal player which emphasized dazzling guitar leads.

Its also worth a note that AIC opened for Slayer, Anthrax and Megadeth on a tour back in the early 1990s and you don't get any more metal than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rppper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. side note about soundgarden......
they were one of the last metal bands of the 80's...the final throes of 80's metal anyhow...louder than love came out in mid 89...their look changed but their music stayed pretty much the same...meaning they were always well produced. soundgarden and AIC were always a little better than the competition because of the fact their line ups were solidified early. together they put out some of the best rock of the 90's...

i saw the concert in the aloha bowl where soundgarden broke up...the bassist flipped off the crowd, the band, spat in disgust, and just walked offstage.

R.I.P. layne.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Both. Next question :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would just classify them as rock-n-roll
That's definitely not metal. I'm not up on today's metal bands, but if you want to hear what real metal sounds like listen to some 80s era Metallica, Megadeth or Anthrax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Option 3: Gretal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're only like my favorite band ever!
I just about know all the words to every single one of their songs. Oh, and I say they are grunge, and grunge itself is a subcategory of metal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Metal at first then contemporary rock.
They were out before the term grunge was coined and were considered Metal. They opened for Slayer on the Clash of the Titans tour in 1990. Their early stuff is really heavy but they got weak and commercial later on. Soundgarden can also fall into this category. Grunge was term applied to anyone who came out of Seattle once Nirvana and Pearl Jam hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. but don't poo-poo nirvana..
their bleached CD is fantastic. Just about anything that came out on the SUB-POP label pre-90 kicked royal ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Only one band from Seattle truly classifies as "grunge"
And that would be Mudhoney...they had that gritty, fuzzed-out Stooges meet Blue Cheer sound. The rest of the Seattle bands had that same common thread, though, which is why most got lumped into the so-called "grunge" sound (or Sub-Pop sound).
Alice in Chains were a metal band, better yet a hair-metal band, before they capitolized on the whole Seattle underground thing (around '90). They were never really in the same sphere as the Sub Pop and C/Z records bands were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. green river?
i'm just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chenGOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Errmmm what about The Melvins???
Mudhoney's great and all, but I'd put the Melvins as Grunge with a capital G.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Grunge? No. Heavy as fuck? Definitely!
The Melvins were in a class of their own. Sadly, I never got to see them live, but a buddy of mine went and had to leave after 20 minutes because they were too damn loud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Weren't they originally a hair metal band who had been kicking...
around for a few years (with little success) who decided to get down with the $eattle $ound?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ye$$
Like I posted earlier, the Seattle scene was very insular- everyone knew each other & often toured together, exchanged personnell, etc...AIC were never a part of that movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. One of the best...
... yet least credited bands of the 1990's. I own everyone of their CD's.

RIP Layne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerek
umm whats alice in chains?
:D
I had waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay tooooooooooooooooo muuuuuuuuuuch to drink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC