Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should priests be allowed to marry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:20 PM
Original message
Should priests be allowed to marry?
Ok, this could tie into my Jesuit post... Think before you answer and read my previous post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fluffernutter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes, i believe they should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikepallas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, they should. Priest and especially bishops married until about 1200
A.D. when the Pope said no more because when a priest or Bishop died the wife and children would get any wealth (and believe it back in the days their were wealthy priests and bishops) they would get it. If the priest/bishop was not tie to a family guess who got the money... YEP Vatican did,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yep
and women were priests in the first 500 so years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Interesting
I did not know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioliberal Donating Member (458 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes I think they should too
Maybe it would stop the problems they have with the children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Now that is truly a ridiculous statement
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Why was that a ridiculous statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I'll Tell You Why It's a Ridiculous Statement
Pedophiles manipulate and control (usually) one person at a time to get their jollies off.

People who use the tragedy to promote a social agenda are attempting to manipulate and control thousands -> millions at a time. For what purpose I don't know. But I find it equally exploitative.

Allowing priests to marry isn't going to fix the problem.
Kicking out all the queers isn't going to fix the problem.
Allowing openly gay priests is not going to fix the problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Not being able to marry......
has nothing to do with being a pedephile. Many priests have long term girlfriends (or boyfriends)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. right and many pedophiles are often married people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Won't Stop a Damn Thing
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. hell no. why should gays be the only ones who can't marry?
in fact, since the only real point of marriage is naturally born children, marriage should start from the moment of conception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. As a feminist, I think that priests are an antiquated, hateful idea from
medieval time and have nothing to do with Christ's concept of this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes.
Personally, I don't think Jesus would care whether they were married or not, as long as they did their jobs effectively and to the best of their ability.

But I've rejected Catholicism, and it wouldn't be up to me anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Agree
I do agree with you, Jesus would care whether they we e married or not. All his followers just needed to teach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, priests and nuns should marry, How do we know Jesus wasn't married?
Anyone read the Da Vinci Code?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Nikepallas is correct.....
this has nothing to do with being celibate, but rather about money and how the Church keeps all it's wealth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. In the old days, every family was expected to "give" a son to the
priesthood, and besides, the priesthood was a means of upward mobility for the sons of poor families, just as becoming a nun was the only respectable way for a Catholic girl to remain unmarried.

I agree that the celibacy requirement is a source of trouble. In today's world, when there's little family pressure to become a priest and men from poor families have other routes of upward mobility, who would agree to celibacy (which is generally understood to mean refraining from sex with women)? Mostly men who aren't interested in sex with grown women anyway.

Now if a gay man goes into the priesthood and finds another adult to have a relationship with, that's not a problem, other than the church being embarrassed if the relationship becomes public knowledge. But if a man is willing to give up relationships with women because he's not interested in sex with any adult, only with children, that's a problem.

The Catholic church in North America and Europe is facing a severe shortage of priests, while the Protestant churches, which not only allow married clergy and have done so since the Reformation, but also ordain women in many cases, have a surplus of clergy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. That decision is up to the authorities within the Church
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Of course they should be "allowed" to marry.
The monolithic patriarchal power structure that was built and codified so long after Jesus lived shouldn't have the right to ban marriage, in my opinion. And in the long years of my parochial education, I never once heard a believable reason given for this destructive rule. Nor for the ban on female priests, nor for a long list of other "that's just the way it is" things we were expected to accept without question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. sure. property inheritance rights are no longer an issue here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Definitely yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Definitely yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabeline Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ministers in other faiths do
so why not Catholics. I'm not a Catholic, so my oppinion doesn't add to much but I think they should be allowed, even if it's a nun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Anyone Should Be Allowed To Marry Whomever They Please...
this is very simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes
And yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskiesHowls Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. Historically, it was decided in the early Councils
Pope Calixtus (ca 217-222 AD) http://www.cfpeople.org/Books/Pope/POPEp16.htm decided that priests should not marry.

For that priests ought never to marry Aurelius testifys in the second Council of Carthage, where he says: "Because the apostles taught thus by example, and antiquity itself has preserved it, let us also maintain it."
http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/concord/web/conf-23.html

However, times have changed!!! The world has changed, and I feel it is time that the canons are changed.
Priests should be allowed to marry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. But you know the real reason?
If priests married, the Catholic Church would lose property when they died to the priests heirs.

Less to do with emulating the apostles than it is about greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Conveniently forgetting that the Apostle Peter had
a mother-in-law, which strongly implies that he had a wife. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. yes, and be gay too
yes INDEED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
njdemocrat106 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. This Catholic says "Yes"
I'm just plain "pro-marriage", be it straight or gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. Wouldn't bother me........then again were not the apostles married.
We've had corrupt married Popes, women priests, and even today those priests from faiths that allow it are allowed to keep their wives. What the big deal is I do not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC