Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just saw "The Aviator" what did you guys think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
NNguyenMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 02:27 AM
Original message
Just saw "The Aviator" what did you guys think?
I thought it was alright, though I expected much better from Scorcese. Leo did a commendable job as Hughes, though he still looked too young during the depiction of Howard Hughes as an older man, not his fault Leo's a goodlooking kid.

I'm not familiar with Hughes's actual biography, but one issue the movie took on was whether or not he was a war profiteer who squelched money from the US government during WWII to design the Hercules and the XF-11 (I think thats what it was) spy plane. I thought the point brought up in the movie that Billions in defense contracts for weapons that end up not working are doled out by the military all the time, and if Hughes dumped plenty of his own money into these planes that ended up grounded it probably meant that he wasn't just profiteering and was really trying to make serious advances into aviation. But then again it was all just a movie, Thoughts anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't seen the movie but
I recently learned that the Boeing Co. facilities were essentially built by the government during WWII so they could get the planes they wanted. Military provided protection at the plants too. My father worked there as an engineer and was assigned a military rank.
After the war, the facilities the government built were turned over to Boeing.
I don't know what the financial transaction of that was but it would be interesting to find out and compare with other aircraft manufacturers such as McDonell-Douglas.
It could be that Hughes was just trying to put himself on equal footing with the others. I can see parallels with what is happening now with defense contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. I cant watch a child baby-face play Howard Hughes!
DiCaprio was/is the wrong choice for this role, but then Scorcese is trying to make money. He is not trying for factually accuracy IMHO.

I remember HH, he was as dirty as he was clean and as smart as he was paranoid. Not someone you would want to marry your sister unless she is in it for the cash only.

The computer phony flight images, pure f-ing trash. Scorcese couldnt find a real P-38? They are still around and they still fly. Modern movies suck. I am sorry for the young people today, they just dont know any better.

I am sick of computer generated movie images. I'd rather watch animation than CGI.

Human grace cannot be generated by any damn machine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. My thoughts when seeing the previews...what a crap choice for HH
Baby faced,pudgy faced Dicaprio is a joke but only chosen because he's "bankable". Hughes was always thin framed,never looked like a DiCaprio puff ball.

I might rent it on DVD but I'll skip the full price at the theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yep, it's a long ways down from Keitel and DeNiro to Dicaprio...
Edited on Mon Dec-27-04 08:53 PM by mitchum
but, then again, Scorsese hasn't made a brilliant movie since "King of Comedy" Cocaine is a hell of a drug...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollywood926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. DiCaprio was VERY good...
although the film is boring as shit. Leo and the performances of Cate Blanchett, Kate Beckinsale (wonderful!) and Alan Alda all make the movie worth seeing. But I was bored to tears with the story. I know I could written it better. They focused too much on the wrong things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. A whitewash of an eccentic, selfish, anti-Semitic, anti-black, brilliant
person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paul Hood Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I liked it
I thought DiCaprio was amazing in it. I don't know about the historical accuracy but I think a lot of people here would enjoy some of the digs against republicans by Hepburn(Blanchett).
Show me the blueprints.
Show me the blueprints.
Show me the blueprints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollywood926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I forgot about that!!!
I loved when she asked him if he was a repuke. Funny.

(she didn't say "repuke") :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paul Hood Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'll take you to see Ibsen if the Republicans haven't banned it.
You're not a Republican are you? I couldn't abide that. Wonderful, although her family was a bit strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't stand a guy in lead roles who looks like he doesn't shave yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hughes was always a war profiteer during Vietnam...
that's why he contributed $$$ to Nixon's slush fund
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, you and I are different...
I have long given up on expecting much better from Scorsese :) It's been a pathetic 20 year slide downhill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC