Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Star Jones have weight loss surgery?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
heidiho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:37 AM
Original message
Did Star Jones have weight loss surgery?
I never watch The View but happened by a TV this morning and noticed how thin she is.

Has she admitted to having weight-loss surgery?

Not a fan of hers, just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. So WLS increases fertility and alters sexual orientation of partners?
Who'da thunk it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Neither
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Hey, you hijacked my smilie
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. Yes, I Did
I posted a thread to thak you for it, but it's sunk into the archives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Star Jones is not so nice
So things balance out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. still, i really object to people making assumptions
...about another's sexuality and presenting the assumption as undisputed fact. It's a rumor, and it's silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I have no issue with anothers sexuality
That is a different issue for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. And I have no issues with Az.
I love Az. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Doh
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
84. says who?
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 05:45 PM by imenja
I watch the View. I see nothing offensive about her, other that she carried on ridiculously about her wedding. I don't listen to gossip or indulge in it. If I don't see something about a person's character with my own eyes--and it's not a political issue, which this surely isn't--I don't believe it. And I'm certainly not going to pay attention to tabloids.

You know what I think all this Star Jones gossip is about? It's hostility toward women who don't conform to hegemonic body images appearing in the media. We saw it a few weeks ago with Candy Crowley. It's sexism, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #84
87. Just to let you know where some of the hostility is coming from
Star Jones has publically berated atheists. She has called us immoral and untrustworthy. Basically the full range of insults we suffer from the more ignorant believers. She has offered no appology and has even publically stated she does not believe she owes anyone an appology. There has also been no public outcry about this except from atheists. She is a bit of a sore point for the atheist community. She represents the permissibility of discriminating against atheists that still exists within this society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. that I've never heard
and I haven't seen it on this thread either, not that I've read all the posts. What I've heard: comments about her weight and charges she's homophobic and that her husband is gay. These last two would seem contradictory, but gossip is never rational.

Where did she make these atheists comments? Not on the View, though she has made clear that she is a strong believer, as nearly all African-Americans are. The importance of religion in African-American communities dating from slavery, through Civil Rights, and the president, is very strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. On the view
Under no circumstances would I ever vote for an atheist because they are terrible and have no moral code.
-- Star Jones, on her television show, The View: she later refused to apologize after being called to the mat by atheist groups (March 16, 2002), pieced together from "No God, Period!" and other sources

What apology? I didn't apologize to anyone. SJ
-- Star Jones, in an e-mail from <ABC.The.View.-SJones@abc.com> to David Fitgerald, a member of the Steering Committee of the San Francisco Atheists who had submitted an e-mail praising Jones for an alleged apology that had been sent to journalist Allie Gottlieb of the San Jose Metro newspaper via telephone, quoted from Conrad Goeringer, AANEWS, American Atheists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. I wasn't watching the show regularly then
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 07:18 PM by imenja
since it's in the day. I TIVO it now. So evidently I missed that.
That is an unfortunate comment.

I think, however, that the majority of gossip about her has nothing to do with that, since that is not what they discuss. I sill maintain that it's hostility against women who don't fit the TV image, similar to the hostility against Candy Crowley over other journalists. Hollywood is full of idiots, but women who are fat or otherwise don't conform to hegemonic ideals of femininity are subject to ridicule. I understand you have a valid reason for resenting her. But most of this gossip is nothing but sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Its unfortunate
That once a person is singled out as reprehensible for some specific reason any characteristice they have that can be seen negatively become open targets. Thus Star Jones who happens to be a bigot towards atheists and possibly a shallow reporter gets targetted for her weight.

Her overly commercialized wedding further drew another part of her life into the public eye for ridicule. Of course this should not extend towards ridiculing her husband and his sexual identity.

My position is simply that of returning the behaviour she delivered to me and my fellow atheists back to her. Just as her professed beliefs would have me do. I take her at her word that she treats others as she wishes to be treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. criticism vs. misogynist discourse
she's not a reporter. She's a TV personality. She has nothing to do with news of any kind. Apparently she does some red carpet stuff and the beginning of awards shows, which I have never seen. Her role on television is for entertainment only.

You don't need to like her. Obviously you have good reason not to. I don't especially like her myself, but I don't dislike her. I do believe that it's important, however, not to engage in gossip about the appearance of women. Those kind of comments are hurtful to all women, not just Star Jones. On DU, Ann Coulter is subject to ridicule--not just for her ideas--but because she is aggressive and behaves in ways that men find threatening. Hence they call her Man Coulter. Because she is opinionated and acerbic, she cannot be a woman. After the inauguration, I saw threads about the size of Laura Bush's ass. Those who make those comments defend themselves by saying she deserves it since she's married to W. The issue is not whether she deserves criticism, but whether it is appropriate to engage in misogynist discourse that degrades all women. Women of course do this as well, some in a bid for male approval. Many women, and certainly feminists, find this kind of discourse highly offensive. I have no objection to anyone raising criticisms about any public figure, but ridicule of the appearance of women or attacks on their very womanhood is part of a culture that seeks to disempower women by presenting them as objects of male desire or repulsion rather than according to their professional abilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #88
93. she's also rude and believes in entitlement. Her latest outrage:
Star Jones, hubby Al Reynolds and their entourage reportedly plunked down in seats reserved for another ticket-holder's family at the Tribeca Film Festival's "Muppets' Wizard of Oz" screening the other night, and refused to give them up. (Page Six)

She has a habit of being RUDE with a capital R to the 'little people' and people who can't advance her. I don't care if she has a history of religion through the history of her people. She dissed atheists. That is unacceptable. If dissing fat isn't allowed, dissing someone's personal beliefs about religion should be banned too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. That "Garbage" You Refuse To Read...
...provides clues into the ways that famous people live their lives. Stories like that show me that Star Jones is a phony who is beneath contempt.

I find nothing admirable in the woman. Not because she's a woman - not because of her size - not because of her choice of a mate - simply because of her actions as a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #87
102. LOL! She's belittled athiests? And they CARE? I missed that
newsflash in the 'athiest community' I guess. DARN IT.

Gee, it couldn't possibly be that her overinflated ego is even bigger than her butt!

It couldn't possibly be that the woman takes her 'name' way too seriously and that her wallowing in the mud of self-glorification has been one of the funniest stunts to watch in decades; or that her self-pimping to attempt to make herself into someone of import and worth regarding has totally fallen apart.

And I won't even get into the layers of back fat pouching out over her dress as she'd run screaming after 'celeb's on the Oscar red carpet who were tripping over themselves to stay as far off camera with her as possible....

Her contract is up with the View and it won't be renewed. She's out of work very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. There's More Than Enough Evidence
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 11:36 AM by CO Liberal
Such as this item reported by the NY Daily News:


Stoned again: Joss Stone was laughing off rumors that under California law, her 25-year-old boyfriend, Beau Dozier, was committing statutory rape by dating the 17-year old. "Well I'm 18 now," the gorgeous soul singer said at her birthday party after the VH1 "Save the Music" concert at Aer in the Meatpacking District. Stone steered clear of the Grey Goose VIP lounge, where Star Jones' hubby, Al Reynolds was dancing with a posse of male friends. Star, who only hours earlier was feeding her husband from her plate, was nowhere to be found ...

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299282p-256181c.html

ON EDIT: See for yourself - Do a google search on <"Star Jones" + husband> - see what comes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Well, there's a bastion of journalistic credibility.
Please don't accuse me of picking on you- I'm just buting your chops, dog. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That Was Just The First Reference I Found
But ya gotta admit the Daily News is far better than the NY Post...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
69. that makes you Jill Sobule
;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
56. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Who the hell cares?
There are ALL sorts of marriages... at least between men and women, that is. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. exactly
thanks. better point than the one i was trying to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. And There Are All Sorts of Phonies Out There
Star Jones is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. are you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
74. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:55 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #75
81. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. fyi - that wasn't me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. Rock the bells!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. ...
thanks, I'll have some... :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. me too
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. hey you'ins better share
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #55
78. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
100. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #100
101. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
85. Just read Star Jones had some poor
guy fired at a hotel because he tried to help her avoid the press by taking her through another door, but the press got to her anyway. Geez, she should be glad that the press even care about her. I think she is a very nasty person. On her bio, she hardly had any friends to talk about her. Only some legal collegues. Anyway, you are right, she is a big phoney......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
83. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #83
94. I don't care about her husband. Doesn't matter. What matters to
me is the kind of personality that can be so mean to others the way she is and not feel an SCRAP of shame. That fascinates me a bit, I will admit. Star Jones is a terrible person in the way she deals with others. I have never read good things about her and the times I've seen her, she was very snide about someone under discussion, very petty. That she doesn't feel any sense of embarrassment is amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. The less Star Jones in the world the better
Not one of my favorite people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkipNewarkDE Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Star Jones is just Awful
She is horrible on the View, constantly wheezing and reminding everyone that "as a lawyer..." blah blah blah. She's a wretched person, and a fauning douche bag on that E! show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. AMEN to that. As is everyone on that show
That show should just be called women's brain liquification daily.

I saw a promo this morning that the Korean chick from Lost would be co-hosting, so I checked the beginning out. As soon as I realized that that chick was a fan of the show and just as interested in only discussing The Apprentice, American Idol, and the Jackson trial as the only "news" worth caring about I had to turn it off with my image of that actress completely crushed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
86. You are hilarious, LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. Can we all agree
that if she had WLS and/or if her husband is gay that isn't important? If anyone wants a real reason to hate her read up on her views about atheists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thats where my reaction is coming from
I go with the assumption that people treat others the way they want to be treated. She has publically stated she believes atheists are evil and immoral people so I take that as a cue as to how she wants to be treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. i don't know, but I'm sure if she did she'd have
corporate sponsor ship and product placement like her wedding. Go away Star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It Looks Like E! Is Fed Up With Star
They decided not to renew her contract to report from the red carpets at award shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. oh dear, she's lost E!, whats next? A nation weeps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. And yet all the fat in her head remains. When, oh when, will...
... medical science come up with a treatment for that! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. But where will she live now?
Since before she always lived 4 feet up her own ass.

I'd prefer she keep losing weight until she disappears into another realm of existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
68. Now THAT was funny!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
95. "Four feet up her own ass" is how Jon Steward described her on
his show once. I'm still laughing about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. Starr Jones? Wasn't she a porn star?
I never saw any of her movies. I can only imagine they were pretty weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
82. no, she has lost the weight slowly
she did not have surgery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #82
99. I Disagree
Edited on Sat Apr-30-05 12:06 PM by CO Liberal
Do a Gogle search on <"Star Jones" + "weight loss surgery">. See how many hits you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
105. Locking
I am locking this thread---It has run its course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC