GMA plays Jackson tape: "I would kill myself, I swear to you"

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8110442/

“He’s in excruciating pain,” the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who met with the singer, told CBS’ “The Early Show” on Monday. “The physical pain is real. There’s also a sense that he feels betrayed by those that he trusted and was betrayed before a jury.”

The singer’s spokeswoman, Raymone K. Bain, told CBS that he had been given muscle relaxants in the past for back spasms and probably got the same treatment Sunday.

Also Monday, ABC’s “Good Morning America” played a tape recording of Michael Jackson that it said was made in 2000 by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, then a spiritual adviser for the star.

In the tape, Jackson says he could not live without children, and if he was told he could “never see another child I would kill myself, I swear to you. Because I have nothing else to live for.” He also referred to the young accuser, a cancer patient, saying: “He was cheated out of his childhood.”

he meets some of his cell mates......

I know MJ will not be convicted but I do know he deserves to be held accountable on some level.

just curious, if he is not convicted what will you demand that he be held accountable for?

i don't mean this as an attack or anything, i am just curious as to your line of reasoning.

thanks

I do have this to say, regardless of the outcome.

If you are a going to put yourself into a position of risk as a wealthy single male adult by having children around, especially in this litiginous society, then at least make sure you don't ever sleep in the same bed with them, innocent intentions or not, and fer cryin' out loud, walk the walk and have some female kids over too, and make sure there are chaperones everywhere.

Oh, and if you really aren't a child molester, then don't leave an opening for Mrs. Lawsuit, Inc. that you could drive a truck through.

Anyway, although he may have an unhealthy "fascination" for young men, and although he's weird, he doesn't fit the profile of a classic "child" molester as I understand it, regardless of how the jury is supposed to be spoon fed the information.

i am not defending his behavior.

i agree with all the points you touched on.

It is not acceptable behavior for a middle aged man to share a bed with non related young children, male and female. I suspect that people would see it differently if the kids he was sharing his bed with were related to him. Although I'd think it strange if my brother in law wanted to have any of my nephews in bed with him.

If he is not sent to jail then he should be sentenced to court mandated psychotherapy. I am sure he was abused and perhaps much of his childhood abuse, emotional and physical, is manifesting itself in his adult behavior. His abuse, however, should not be accepted as an excuse to vicimize another generation.

you would "convict" him of doing something that is not illegal? and then demand that he seek therapy for what you determine to be unacceptable behavior?

the problem is, sharing a bed with a minor is not illegal as far as i understand it. how do you legally pursue the route you suggest?

i just don't see how it can be done realistically in our court system.

i am not defending his behavior, i am suggesting that there is no way to legally hold him accountable for doing something that is not illegal.

45 year old MAN to have YOUNG BOYS in his BED overnight? I don't think I am outside the cultural norm on this when I find it highly unusual for a middle aged man to sleep in the same bed as young boys.

If a wealthy, but very generous eccentric in your town wanted to have your young boys overnight, wouldn't you be suspicious?

If even a tenth of what MJ is accused of doing was done by someone with fewer financial resources and less noteriety, that man would be sitting in prison for a long time and would have to register as a sex offendor for the remainder of his life.

i have not claimed that i thought it was appropriate for him to share a bed with young boys.

the point is it is not illegal as i understand the law.
so you can't effectively hold someone accountable for something that is not illegal.

that is my only point.
he is not being tried for sleeping in the same bed with children he is being tried for sexual abuse. if he is not convicted of sexual abuse you can not expect him to be held accountable for sleeping in the same bed as children as it is not illegal.

Do we take joy in prison rape?

I can't stand it when I see that. There are a lot scumbag prisoners in the world who deserve a lot of bad stuff to happen to them, but I don't think anyone deserves to be raped.

And when you realize that there are some innocent men in that population who end up being victimized, well, its really evil.

I'm sure they shared a room and even the same bed. This is not new in large poor families.

When I was very young and visited my grand parents, I used to sleep with my uncle in his room, right next to him in his bed. So did all my cousins, male and female. My uncle never touched me or any of us inappropriately. My uncle was a bachelor, never married.

When we visited my cousins, I used to sleep with my boy cousins, three or four in the same bed. Now as adults, we have great memories and joy of those happy times. There was nothing dirty, nothing sexual.

I'm amazed at how Christian this country claims to be, but they throw big stones and add more misery to a person who's down and out. All for money. Those TV people reporting on MJ are pretty Satan-like.

for everyone to have their own beds, a luxury of our wealthy society. How spoiled we are.

and three boys). I DID share a room but NEVER a bed with ANY of my siblings. Yes, we were poor/lower middle class and qualified for free school lunches.

I think many of MJ's problems can be atributed to the fact that he is a celebrity and as such he probably only hears yes from those he hires (or they don't remain employed for very long). He really needs therapy but who would have the guts to tell their boss, regardless of who it is, "dude you need to see a psychiatrist or psychologist." I know I wouldn't have the nerve to tell my boss and she's not insanely rich like MJ.

The parents share responsbility as well. MJ has a history of "different" relationships with children yet star struck, and often poor/lower middle class parents, continue to allow him access to their children.

who, despite his generosity, is somewhat of a stranger to you?

Would you really?

1. the idea that your children would know better than to let anything happen because you had been a good parent and discussed these things with them. The knowledge that they would say something if anything did start to happen.

2. the perhaps mistaken belief that the sleeping arrangements were supervised, or at the very least, not one on one.

3. you are an evil fuck who thinks that the risk of whoring your kid out for diddling outweighs the benefit of winning a legal case regardless of whether said diddling occurred or not.

And I think that any parent that assumes any three of these things is out of their right mind.

no big deal.

with any kid is okay. A lot of people who think its fine for Mike then have to agree its fine with Bob and Joe and Mary Kay no matter the age or circumstances. He's a dangerous person and although he was warned by everyone around him, he knows better. Rules don't apply to him. He's a sick, sick man and probably a criminal. If its okay for Mike to do this, then why are we upset with the priests?

The truth is, I have no idea if he is dangerous or not. And I'm not sure anyone else does either. My point was that I did sleep with members of my own family and they were not molesters. Is it possible that Jackson is innocent? I think I still believe in innocent until proven guilty. There are many very sick people out there as we both know. I think many of the priests were guilty...but I don't know thise cases specifically and I couldn't tell you who is and who isn't. I'm just saying that just because people sleep in the bed together does not prove they are a molester. That was my only point. To say that it is done with no bad intentions or consequences.

by doubling up. Michael Jackson is neither poor nor disadvantaged. He does not sleep with boys from necessity, but because he likes to.

Jacko gets a a whole lot more out of the sleep situation than they do. His sleeping with these children is to satisfy his needs, not theirs. And that is what is so enormously nauseating about the whole thing.

In my estimation there's nothing to admire or pity about him, he's just another sick fuck.

Even if there is nothing overtly sexual, his obsession/ addiction to children is highly disturbing.

That's what is as fucked up. His family, his friends, his employees just let this go on.

If he's guilty one thing, it's being an idiot.

There are no young boys in the prison he so deserves.

Here he is NOT endangering "Blanket" (sarcasm)

Witnesses for the defense testified that kids at the ranch drank wine, watched porn and slept in MJ's bed. Jay Leno, who again testified for the Defense, said he thought Jackson was guilty of molestation. With Defense witnesses like these, how will they find him not guilty of any of the charges?

Defense witness testimony - Accuser drank, watched porn, etc. at Neverland: http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2005-05-18-jackson-cousin_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA

Jay Leno - "Jackson's guilty":
http://www.smh.com.au/news/People/Jacksons-guilty-but-accuser-was-coached-Leno/2005/03/17/1110913714866.html?oneclick=true

of "his" children?

His life must be hell.

BREAKING HEADLINES:
"Michael Jackson Much Too Sick a Fuck to Stand Trial"

"I FEEL LIKE ABOUT A MILLION BUCKS!"
whines megabucks freakshow extraordinaire

Exclusive BEFORE/AFTER photos:
http://presidentevilonline.com/sn_jacko.html

even though some circumstances are suggesting he didn't. He's crazy either way.

Given his upbringing, it's TRAGIC.

A lot of us were cheated out of our childhoods. Very few of us by pop starts or people with fame and money that we could exploit in return. Most of us by bullies, creeps, and even 'peers'.

I was cheated out of my childhood. Feel free to PM me for my life's story. The fact I'm here, not crazy, not dead, or not seeking revenge should be a testament to the triumph of the human condition. (though the way people are, maybe I am God's little joke...)

I'm all for peace and love and understanding, and what you're saying is essentially true... but then again, ALL great monsters are tragic; it is this dimension of tragedy and pathos that makes them truly mythic, truly GREAT...
In his case, I'd say he is indeed a mythic monster; whatever forces that formed him remain a mystery, but his intentions seem clear...
Even if it's not something one could say was DONE to him, even if he actually made all the wrong choices, all the way down the line, I'd still say there's an element of chance, of luck, in ANY human life... everything can turn on a dime...
But that doesn't mean he shouldn't be stopped. I think it's pretty obvious he's using his immense wealth and fame to protect himself as he blatantly indulges his predeliction for young boys... and these are kids, and that's a serious crime, against young innocents, and we should STOP him if it's apparent he's doing that.
Which is, again, what I'M seein'...
I see you around a lot on these boards, and we are usually in a zen-like harmony of perfect agreement... even here, though, this is one of those where I just have to tip my hat and say, I guess that's a good thing, people extending a bit of understanding, even in extreme situations such as this...
It's a GOOD instinct, cuz you're right; it's too bad, there's a human trapped in there somewhere...
But if he IS guilty of this stuff, I think they should lock his ass up!... and they should do lil' tv spots, The More You Know, tellin' kids AND THEIR PARENTS not to be stupid and go with a stranger when he tells you he's got candy and ice cream and balloons and a roller coaster and a ferris wheel... and he really does.
As well as 6 or 7 previous allegations of sexual imposition on a minor in his known personal history... those parents oughta have to attend Reality Camp...

I remember when Sony gave him half a BILLION dollars to do some commercials in the mid-90's... one of those staggering stories that makes your flesh crawl, it's just so unbelievably unfair and stupid, just plain stupid to lay all that loot on one cat... I wrote a parody song about it, and in the end MJ gets buried under the ton of money they bring to his house in a dump truck...
I think that's what got him, though. Too much wealth; too much of a good thing.
D

if you'd like to read my further rantings on Power as the Greatest Addiction, check out
http://presidentevilonline.com/addiction.html

Poor Michael! He's looking

a bit down in the mouth!

I don't feel sorry for him so the old hospital publicity ploy does not work with me. fortunately for him I am not on the jury or I vote to send him up the river.

"When the defense rested in Michael Jackson's child molestation case on Friday, a very important issue that had been raised was lost. Defense attorney Robert Sanger as much as conceded that the pop star's children may not be his own."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,158077,00.html