Breaking Supereme Court rules against Nativity scene in Washington DC

DanCa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 02:31 PM
Original message

Breaking Supereme Court rules against Nativity scene in Washington DC

The Supreme Court has ruled that there cannot be a
Nativity scene in Washington, DC this Christmas
season. This isn't for any religious reason; they
simply have not been able to find three wise men and a
virgin in the Nation's capitol.

There was however, no problem finding enough asses to
fill the stable.

It's a joke Psych.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MsUSA

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message

1. This has been sent on.......

:applause: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DanCa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. I read it twice myself lol. D:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rabrrrrrr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message

3. This fucker is more tedious and annoying than the brazillion joke

When are people gonna stop posting the goddamn thing?

For fuck's sake, how many times do we have to see this shit?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DanCa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #3

4. First Time I saw it *shrug* thought it was funny.

Also thought people could post want they want on forums.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rabrrrrrr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. Gosh, let me look at what I posted...

I'm just curious....

where did I say that you couldn't post what you want?

Let me check....

Let me check....

Let me check....

Let me check....

Let me check....

Let me check....

looking....

looking....

looking....

looking....

looking....

Well, son of a bitch, I never said that!

Must be awfully embarrassing to you to have misquoted me. But don't worry, this isn't academia, so I won't call for your tenure to be removed, I won't call for your censure, nor will I call for your credentials to be removed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DanCa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. Easy thier froggy

Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 11:26 PM by DanCa

On being misquoted I said I thought people can post what they want.
How was that quoting anyone?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rabrrrrrr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. It was clearly an implied accusation that I said, or at least inferred,

that people could not post what they want.

Jst because you didn't have quote marks doesn't mean that you misrepresented me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DanCa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Dec-06-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message

8. Lol i am sorry. I've had a really bad bad day..

Let me know if were cool. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.