Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re-watched The Graduate last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:14 PM
Original message
Re-watched The Graduate last night
& I have to say, Mrs. Robinson was smoking hot. Hotter than Katherine Ross.

According to IMDB, Anne Bancroft was born in 1931, & that movie came out in 1967, so she was 35-36 when it was filmed. Seems like nowadays many women are having their first children at that age, not marrying off their undergrad-at-berkeley daughters. I'd always thought of Mrs. Robinson as late-40s-ish before.

Otherwise, i was surprised at how little actually HAPPENS in the movie. Lots of driving & sitting around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Brilliant film
I forget the age difference, but Ann Bancroft was just a little bit older than Dusty.

Yeah...that movie's probably responsible for more older-women fantasies than any other (even In Search of MIL*s, Volume 17).

But Katherine Ross, though...phew...and still a fine looking woman now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. But remember Katherine Ross was an unplanned pregnancy
Mrs. Robinson told Benjamin that after sex at some point - somthing about her being conceived in the back of a Ford...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Having thier first kids then?
No wonder fertility clinics are booming! Female fertility starts to decline at 28.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's part of the desperation of Mrs Robinson though
She's, what, around 40 (plus or minus) in the movie and she's spent her entire adult life trapped in a loveless marriage that she didn't want to be in in the first place.

And people say those were the good old days....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. She was playing older than she really was.. there's along history of
that in films. And Dustin himself was actually about 30...too old for the average college student.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Bancroft was around 36, Hoffman just about 30
Similar to Angela Lansbury and Lawrence Harvey in "The Manchurian Candidate"--he was only 3-4 years younger than her, but she convincingly played his mother.

I still think "The Graduate" is awfully smug, facile, and very overrated, but I wasn't a baby boomer, so maybe I didn't have the visceral reaction lots of people coming of age in the 60's who saw it did.

I do, however, think it's damn shame that when Anne Bancroft died, most of the obituaries dwelled on Mrs. Robinson (complete with snapshots of her smoking in the leopard-skin coat), and not her Oscar-winning turn in "The Miracle Worker." Bancroft also complained about this later in life; all I can figure is, a lot of current-day news editors and film who saw the film in their formative years saw her as one of their first sexual fantasies, and never quite recovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I have not seen the movie
but I read the book, and thought it strange and stupid. I wonder if the whole big appeal of the movie is just some male fantasy of being seduced by an attractive woman. Hey wow, it must have something deep and important to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. No way!! Ross was way hotter than Bancroft!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. to each his own
anne bancroft looks more, ummm, carnal to me.

ross is very all-american. still, she's right purty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bancroft looks anything BUT carnal to me!!
Anyone else? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. She sure as hell wasn't 35 in that movie.
She had to have been at least 42. Either that or she aged incredibly badly. (She is beautiful in the movie, but she's no 35.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. She was born in 1931.
The movie was released in '67 which means it was probably filmed in '66 which would have made her 35 at the time it was filmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC