Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jackson Mulls Hobbit Film

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:18 PM
Original message
Jackson Mulls Hobbit Film
Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson told the Australian news.com.au Web site that he is now interested in helming a movie version of J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit. Jackson said that Rings studio New Line Cinema had yet to speak to him about The Hobbit and added there were some difficulties related to the rights for the book.

snip.........

Lord of the Rings executive producer Mark Ordesky confirmed to the site that "there could be a movie about The Hobbit. Enough said." Before that, however, Jackson will have to complete work on his upcoming remake of the classic SF movie King Kong.

http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/art-main.html?2003-12/01/11.30.film
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES! YES!
Do it Peter.. do it!

Hobbit is so awesome! I wanna see Smaug go to town! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. !!!
I was just saying the other day that I wanted him to do this! I hope he does... :bounce:

Hey Kheph!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hi!
I'm feeling much better today! MUCH better! I'll write you back later on tonight.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good to hear it!
DU has'nt been the same without ya! x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a slight error in that article
Tolkein was working on pretty much everything Middle Earth-related at the same time - he didn't necessarily finish The Hobbit before starting on The Lord of the Rings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Not true
He completed the Hobbit entirely before he considered writing LOTR because the publisher wanted a sequel and Tolkien wanted to try his hand at a full length adult story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another remake of King Kong?
Geez, is that something the world needs? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Normally, I'd say "no!"
But Jackson is going to expand a lot on Kong Island and that might make the difference.

Heck, it's a dream project of his and, due to his LotR work, I'm willing to give him a chance to win me over with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh good God yes
there is a God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah!!!! Jackson can destroy another piece of art!!!
I can't wait to hear Smaug come flying out from the Lonely Mountain as he hurtles towards Lake Town screaming...

"Looks like meat's back on the menu!!!"

I'm going to be ill.

Leave it alone Peter. Let someone with some talent do it.

david

*dodges tomatoes*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not throwing a tomato............
but who, in your opinion, would do a better job? I think the're quite good but everyone's entitled to their opinion. Who would you suggest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Good question!
(sorry for the delay!)

I don't know who could do a reasonable job of The Hobbit, and I can assure you that a Hobbit which met with my expectations (as would a LotR) would likely fail miserably at the box office.

The Hobbit is acutally harder, IMO, than LotR, because it's got more heart to it, and more innocence, and it's a more juvenile story - so it would require someone who could somehow balance the non-talking down to prose with the lighter fare, without it getting too smart or too stupid.

The good part is that the visuals are the most trivial aspect now (who would ever have thought this possible???). Jackson and Co have done a great job of bringing Alan Lee's and the other gent's artwork to life, so we know that it's certainly possible.

I think I'd let Peter S. Beagle write the screenplay (which would need very little actual writing). Goodness, but who could direct it? Hmmmmmmm. Certainly NONE of the big names, no Lucas, Howard, Speilberg. It would have to be someone with a softer touch (and more talent, Speilberg aside).


All that said, I'm a purist (well, mostly), and I think of paramount importance is to retain as much as possible (beyond what might be lucrative) of the language of the text. Don't change a word if not necessary. Don't change a plot device if it can be avoided.

In my opinion, classics like, for example, "The Grinch Who Stole Christmas" - the short Animated version, TOWERS above "The Grinch" or the like, simply because rather than using the story as a premise for the film, the animated version used the text of the book, and "brought it to life". The charm of Seuss, Tolkien and even Shakespeare is, IMO, the language. The pictures are nice, the plot is great, moral super, but the key is the language - stick to that, and how can you go wrong?

I also think the old animated version of "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe" will utterly tower over anything that a $100M budget will eventually produce in Hollywood.

All that said, I bear a personal grudge against Jackson because of all the popularity he's gotten, when, IMO, Bakshi did a FAR superior job of FotR and TTT 25 years ago. Now, if that doesn't make me enemies I don't know what will. Though 100x rather see a LotR part II by Bakshi, I will say that I don't think he's the man for The Hobbit.

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC