Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's resolve this childishness once and for all - my new sig pic:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 01:01 AM
Original message
Poll question: Let's resolve this childishness once and for all - my new sig pic:
"Love mankind"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
1.  I voted four, but...
Spock understood love. His logical, unemotional training did not allow it, but he was half human, raised by a human mother. He KNEW love, and possessed love, and could give love. It was the struggle, between his logical, stern father side and his emotional, loving mother side that made the character fascinating.

We all must find balance. I believe our capacity for love and logic can coexist. That is why we are Progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. My dear HypnoToad!
I love your sig pic!

Star Trek was one of the TV shows that me and my husband watched back in the middle 1960's.....

We loved it......And Spock was one of my favs......

The picture is entirely appropriate, IMHO......It's a keeper!

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. It would be cooler with the Spock with a goatee.
The one from "Mirror, Mirror".


(kill me now, I'm a ST:TOS geek!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I was confused by the way good Commander Riker was replaced
by the evil version in TNG without any explanation.

Good Riker:



Evil Riker:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benfea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's offensive because the original series SUCKED. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Heresy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benfea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Bad acting, bad directing, bad writing...
At least you can say the special effects were state of the art for the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. DARKSIDED!!!
GET THEE OUTA MY HOUSE!!! BLASPHEMING THE STAR TREK!! YOU'RE ALL DARKSIDED!!

sorry. forgot to take my meds today. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Not as much as its spinoff tv shows had...
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benfea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You are of course welcome to your (wrong) opinions. ;)
As far as I'm concerned, Deep Space 9 was the best series to come out of the Star Trek universe. But then, I tend to be interested in stupid stuff (acting, writing, etc.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. I like it.
And it has this whole ironic juxtaposition going on. That makes it kind of intellectual too. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's not offensive
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 03:50 AM by BuffyTheFundieSlayer
And I think it's perfect that they had Spock pondering the grafitti, since he's the one who would be most likely to really think upon it. The average human would see it and just toss it aside with nary a thought, whereas Spock would actually analyze it as he was wont to do with anything, but particularly things he found "fascinating" or "illogical". And love and mankind, I gather, he found to be both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think it's great!
Spock's expression and body language in that pic are just perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm fine with it.
But personally, I'm partial to a slightly different slogan, "TO SERVE MAN."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not offensive, and also
I heard once that the word "man" means human, and that a woman is a specialised man, that is to say, a man with a womb.

Can't comment on the correctness of that, but I'm sure someone will now tell me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's a great sig line
I see no problem that could even begin to make it offensive to anyone. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC