Man Sues Himself For Vehicle Damage - Case Pending

<snip>

LODI, Calif. --When a dump truck backed into Curtis Gokey's car, he decided to sue the city for damages. Only thing is, he was the one driving the dump truck.

But that minor detail didn't stop Gokey, a Lodi city employee, from filing a $3,600 claim for the December accident, even after admitting the crash was his fault.

After the city denied that claim because Gokey was, in essence, suing himself, he and his wife, Rhonda, decided to file a new claim under her name.

City Attorney Steve Schwabauer said this one also lacks merit because Rhonda Gokey can't sue her own husband.

"You can sue your spouse for divorce, but you can't sue your spouse for negligence," Schwabauer said. "They're a married couple under California law. They're one entity. It's damage to community property."

But Rhonda Gokey insisted she has "the right to sue the city because a city's vehicle damaged my private vehicle."

In fact, her claim, currently pending at Lodi City Hall, is for an even larger amount -- $4,800.

"I'm not as nice as my husband is," she said.

http://www.boston.com/news/odd/articles/2006/03/15/man_sues_himself_for_vehicle_damage?mode=PF

Normally, an employer (or other entity) is responsible for the negligence of it's agents. Here the agent damaged his own property though. Actually he's not suing himself, he's suing the city. I would have appealed the initial denial myself...

cases"

"Baliff, kick these two nuts in the butt"

~ Opus

time after they get a ding and want to bump it up so the entire quarterpanel has to be replaced.

Oops, did I just smash the back of that car? Guess the city will have to get it rebuilt.

:rofl:

Enough said. :donut: :)