:wtf:
<snip>
MELVIN, Ky. --Amid a backdrop of colorful swingsets, clunky cars and giggling kids, a beast with a thick mane and daunting eyes paces in his cage. To some around this small Appalachian town, he's a frightening menace. To others, he's the local mascot, a novelty.
But to the Collins family, he's "Kitty," their beloved pet lion.
"That's my kid," said 22-year-old Melissa Collins, a married mother of three, as she pet Kitty through his 300-square-foot chain-link cage.
County officials may try to force the Collins family to find a new home for Kitty soon, though the family says it will fight the effort.
A county ordinance that would bar animals deemed "inherently dangerous" by the state is up for a vote Friday. If it passes, Kitty would no longer be allowed to stay in this rural neighborhood, where homes are within a few yards of each other.
Pauline Hall, who lives three houses down from the Collins family, said she lives in fear of the lion.
"I think it needs to be in a different environment," Hall said. "Everybody here keeps their guns loaded."
A Kentucky regulation that went into effect in July prohibits transporting animals labeled inherently dangerous by the state Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, such as vipers, alligators, bears, tigers and lions.
But folks like Barry and Melissa Collins, who owned dangerous animals before the rule went into effect, are allowed to keep them, said Laura Patton, a state wildlife biologist. Bringing in more dangerous animals or breeding the ones they already have is still against the rules.
The state does not have a law that specifically deals with the ownership of exotic wildlife, she said.
http://www.boston.com/news/odd/articles/2006/05/17/kentucky_family_fights_to_keep_pet_lion?mode=PF