|
Edited on Sun May-21-06 01:31 AM by pitohui
either he is not a very good mathematician or you did not understand what he was saying -- since you believe him to be a pioneer in his field i will chalk it up to misunderstanding but your post and the statement is downright silly it is so wrong-headed
you do not make decisions on the basis of "the thrill of playing," you make decisions based on your expected value, your risk of ruin based on the size of your bankroll, etc.
i'm guessing almost anyone, and certainly almost any young person who is still able to work, would do very well to risk their entire disposable bankroll on the 1 in 2 chance of winning $10 million dollars
what do you have in the bank? let's say it is $20,000 that you have painfully saved up over the last 5 years, i will tell you right now that you have a huge huge HUGE advantage if someone would actually book your bet and allow you to pay $20,000 for a 1 in 2 chance at $10 million dollars
a 1 in 2 chance is the same chance as a coin toss of a fair coin
half the time you lose the $20,000 and your life is no different
the other half the time you win $10 million! and everything is changed
any smart person would take that bet over and over and over again until the casino security guards 86'd from the property
blackjack bought my house w. a way way way infinitesimally small advantage to compared to that!
if he really gave you advice using the words "the thrill of playing" he was basically just calling you an idiot in polite language -- he was saying you are too stupid to understand even basic math when it comes to getting an edge in gambling and you shouldn't trouble your little head, honey
i wish i was better at putting the math in language, it is like there is a block in the brain so i can't find the words, but your advice is truly terrible
jesus, it used to break my heart, all these people in the casino losing when they could be winning, i just wish i had the words to translate these concepts into english
|