Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman Wins $2 Million in Suit Against Beverly Hills Matchmaker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 12:59 PM
Original message
Woman Wins $2 Million in Suit Against Beverly Hills Matchmaker
http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/wireStory?id=2023889

LOS ANGELES May 31, 2006 (AP)— A widow won $2.1 million from a high-priced matchmaker whom she claimed failed to deliver on promises of introductions to cultured, wealthy men.

Anne Majerik, a 60-year-old social worker from Erie, Pa., claimed in a lawsuit that she paid Beverly Hills matchmaker Orly Hadida $125,000 to be introduced to men who wanted monogamous relationships, earned more than $1 million and had estates of up to $20 million.

Instead, she said, she only got a few introductions to inappropriate men. For example, her suit claimed, the matchmaker's "international banker" turned out to be "an interpreter that worked in a bank."

Orly claimed Majerik became her client after she helped the widow prevail in a lawsuit against another matchmaker, San Diego-based Valenti International. She said Majerik, whose husband died in 1999, gave her "enthusiastic feedback about nearly every man to whom Orly had introduced her."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
commander bunnypants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. HOw in the frig does a social worker
make that much money?


CB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Widow
You are gonna have to find you a sugardaddy and start throw it around.

Yikes that even frightens me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It does say she's a widow.
So maybe her husband was wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would note that 'won'
is an incorrect verb here and that even the accurate "was awarded" is often misunderstood.

Ridiculous judgements such as this are often reduced by the bench.

Dammit, I hate sloppy editing. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC