|
For a couple of days, I've been out with two of my superiors, both of them ladies of about my young age, as we attempt to recruit new underlings from the incoming Freshman class. They told me that girls with expensive purses were unlikely to join us working in the dining hall because they already have plenty of spending money, and proceeded to point out examples. They then quizzed me on the knowledge.
I am now able to identify the brand of the most popular models of Chanelle, Coach, Vera-Bradley, Luis-Vitton, and Prada handbags. They told me that the small bags, barely bigger than my hand, cost $50-200, which would buy me months of food, high-end portable electronic devices, a very good used bike, a complete overhaul of my current bike, a recent video game console, a flat screen computer monitor, or many other things that seem more worth the money to me, and still leave enough money for a higher-quality purse from many stores. The larger ones apparently go for $500-800, and I daresay that if I had money to spend that much on a bag, I wouldn't work for a dining hall either.
The easiest to spot from a distance are the Coach bags that are covered with lots of C's in different colors. I renamed this the "kids with crayons" edition. The most baffling of all are the Vera-Bradley bags, which sell very, very well locally, at altogether stupid prices. According to my coworkers, in addition to the popular sizes selling for about $400, they fall apart after several washes and a no longer fashionable after a new pattern is released, which happens about every four months. I can sincerely claim that given three hours, a good sewing machine, and a trip to a fabric store, I could create better with my own hands.
The conversation later turned to which jeans made similar indications about the wearers. Unable to keep track of all of the specifics, I told them that I was more concerned by the overall shape than the details of the stitching. I've never seen them look so amused as they did at that.
|