Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio's Top Court Says Consensual Stepfather Sex Illegal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:31 PM
Original message
Ohio's Top Court Says Consensual Stepfather Sex Illegal
<snip>

COLUMBUS, Ohio - The state's incest law bars sex between a stepfather and an adult-age stepchild, even if both sides participate willingly, the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled.

The court ruled Wednesday against former Stark County Sheriff's Deputy Paul Lowe, 42 when his 22-year-old stepdaughter accused him of having sex with her in 2003 while she was passed out after a night of partying. He claimed the sex was consensual.

Lowe pleaded no contest to sexual battery in 2004. The judge in Canton delayed the four-month sentence pending appeal.

Lowe's attorney, J. Dean Carro, asked the Ohio Supreme Court to overturn the conviction, saying the incest law was ambiguous and inconsistent. He said consenting adults have a right to personal intimacy.

In a 6-1 decision, the court disagreed and said parents "do not cease being parents," whether natural or stepparents, when a child turns 18.

If Lowe had been divorced and was no longer the stepfather to his wife's daughter, the statute would no longer apply, the court said.

Justice Paul E. Pfeifer dissented and said the law was meant to protect children and not criminalize sex between consenting adults.

Carro said he needed to speak with Lowe before deciding on an appeal.

http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/state/16809930.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Guess Woody Allen Is Glad He Doesn't Live In Ohio
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. was never her stepfather so law would not apply
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. he wasn't her stepfather "legally"
but it doesn't make his behavior less disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt this case will come up in the next judicial election
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good decision. Step-father abused his step-daughter and
thought he might get away with it. I hope he's divorced now, in addition to being on his way to jail. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. The 22 year old says it wasn't consensual, so it's not a case of consenting adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The court ruling also covers consensual stepdad/adult stepkid sex
Or atleast that's how I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The dissenting judge brought up the consensual aspect
Apparently the guy's entire defense was the they were consenting adults, but she's basically saying it was rape! So I don't see why thought they could use the consenting adult angle. Takes two for consent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. wow
I'm suprised the prosecuted him under this statute instead of a rape statute. That was a pretty gutsy thing to do considering her age. Rulings like this give me hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. That ain't right. In Genesis, Lot's daughters got him drunk and had sex with him,
and God had absolutely no problem with that. They both got preggers and their kids went on to found their own clans. Father/daughter incest should be legalized, especially if it involves alcohol abuse. The Bible says so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. How about mother/son scenarios?
Or else somebody's got some splainin' to do regarding what Cain and Abel did... or at least Cain, after killing Abel (holy jealousy spat, Batman! :wow: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC