Twin Sisters Take Naked Pics Of Themselves With 5 Y.O. Boy - Have Pics Developed At Walgreens

<snip>

Twin sisters from Sheboygan were reported to police by photo developers after taking partially nude pictures of each other in front of a 5-year-old boy — and in one case having the child take a picture of them — according to Sheboygan police.

The 29-year-old women turned in the racy photos for developing at Walgreen Drug Store, 1029 N. 14th St., and store employees reported them to police on Sunday, said Lt. Jeff Johnston of the Sheboygan Police Department. Both were arrested Monday.

Johnston said the pictures show the women in provocative underwear and in some cases topless, with the boy sometimes in the background. The women apparently took the pictures of each other, and one picture of both of them was taken by the child, Johnston said.

Both women are expected to be charged today with exposing a child to harmful material.

The Department of Social Services was called in to help interview the boy and follow up on his welfare, Johnston said.

The photos were taken in the 3000 block of N. 15th St., where one of the women lives, he said.

http://www.sheboygan-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070327/SHE0101/70327050/1973

this is one of those times...

or did he just see some underwear and nudity?

No child has ever been harmed by seeing a naked body. Unless there's more going on that what's presented here, the crime is that the police are involved in this at all.

Because I've worked with many women, children, and even men that are harmed by flashers and such.

NAMBLA argues that children want to participate in adult sexual activities, but that doesn't make it true.

There's no comparison between seeing someone naked and having a predator after you.

I'm conflicted on the issue of flashers. If you are uncomfortable about nudity then a flasher is going to be a terrible thing. A naturist (nudist), or just someone who isn't concerned about nudity, is going to see flashing as a sign that the flasher has emotional problems but isn't going to be traumatized by it.

I still don't see anything that indicates that this kid was harmed in any way. And the fact that some people are upset about flashers doesn't mean that nudity is inherently harmful.

If they were doing that to the kid, I could see it as being more actionable. If it's just nudie pics with nothing sexual, to me that's less potentially harmful. Not responsible or bright, but not criminal either in my view.

or anything... they were charged with "disorderly conduct".

You can be charged with that in WI for cursing in public.

but, i think a certain vibe HAD to be in the air...


the word 'racy'
leaves a lot to the imagination

It sounded like a juicy story... "hot blonde twins", blah blah blah.

Media is all hype.

I think it's considered irresponsible to parade nude in front of a five year-old and have him take your topless pictures, but I don't know if it's criminal.

Look below for link to actual charges on Wisconsin Circuit Court Access (WCCA). They were charged with "Disorderly Conduct" which is the equivalent of "bullshit".

with children seeing nude bodies in an incidental way, but something about taking pictures and having the child take pictures strikes me as crossing a line somehow. I guess it really depends on the context and poses in the pictures, which I'm sure we'll never see.

it becomes black, no longer gray, imho.

How does a five year old tell an "adult" no?

it is not the 'sex' thing but, the 'power' thing that is weird to me

also wonder if their intent was to distibute these for profit

I feel bad that this kid was exposed to that, but I am glad that those women were stupid enough to have their photos developed at Walgreens.

but even I will say this crosses the line.
---
You hear stories of Wal-Mart and other photo developers turning in people who take pictures while vacationing at say a nudist resort and such. Mnay people here will see that as a gray area - my take is that doesn't automatically qualify as child endangerment.

would you see it the same way if it was a 5 year old girl taking pictures with naked men?

let's say a father having his picture taken by his daughter - in a neutral environment, and this family is comfortable in their nudity. I wouldn't see a problem.

If it's a five year old girl with a non-relative male in the bedroom, I would cringe at that.

it would have said so, otherwise, I think. not saying it is a bad thing neccesarily, but it really does fall under the Felix Frankfurter definition, "I know it when I see it" people hanging out skinny dipping is one thing, cuddling on the couch is a completely different thing. it's just a funny line.

but who is the random boy?

Yeah, and watching your folks do the nasty is a family rite.

Which leads me to believe it wasn't as "racy" as they are trying to make it out.

lol

Hey, there's always a silver lining.

From http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/6736346.html

Blech!

(the dunderheads will go to Walgreens and have their "digital film" processed because, like true idiots, they don't even know the proper, technical term for their flash RAM modules and need to be patronized every stinkin' step of the way... :eyes: )

Edit: Grammatical error.

What are their names? I'd like to visit sometime... :P

You can even get their addresses in that...

Absolutely not "Girls Gone Wild" material. :P

I hate kids. x(

for Oregon, Washington, and Idaho.. I was the digital guy. I had to look at every photo that people wanted on CD. Some really freaky shit went through that place. I have seen way to many pictures of suicides. Most police departments used us. And 95% of the population needs to keep the lights off when they get naked.

the the photo developing guys make extra copies of the really good stuff for themselves?

Only the people that worked with digital.. We did 50,000+ normal pictures per hour. It would be impossible to re-print a roll that had pictures of boobs. I could make a new CD of those pictures in seconds, if they got scanned into the KUDUFUS first.


*Not impossible, we would just have to talk to the boss fist.

Just wondering.