Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ok, this made me chuckle: the store "Socks Galore" has *random* drug tests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:27 AM
Original message
Ok, this made me chuckle: the store "Socks Galore" has *random* drug tests
(Not that I'm applying to THAT store--just seeing if the places I'm applying will have random piss tests b/c while I'm clean now, I enjoy the good bud after a long day but do want to stay employed ya know?)

Anyway, so, apparently a sock superstore makes sure they don't have stoners manhandling the socks...which might be good policy. Knowing me, I'd try on every sock and play with them :rofl:

JK. I'd never go to work under the influence of anything...but c'mon--a SOCK store doing RANDOM piss tests? Lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. How sad is it that there is a store devoted to SOCKS!?!
And we seriously wonder what's wrong with America? We're concerned about the stylishness of our SOCKS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. here's what's even more sad (to me): Carl's Jr. apparently does RANDOM piss test
And some restaurants do *hair* tests.

Seems a wee bit harsh to me.

And yes, a store dedicated to socks is indeed sad :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. CJ's only "randomly" tests if they're losing $
Unless they've changed the policy very recently, Carl's Junior restaurants are only, according to my experience, tested if the store is either not making money or losing money.

Hair tests are kind of bullshit at any rate: they're not reasonably accurate, for marijuana they're pathetically easy to beat, for hard drugs they're still relatively easy to beat, and they only test what's been done in the last 1 to 9 months.

The best advice? Don't take drugs. You'll probably pass every test out there.

But that's just me.


Interesting note: Every drug test I encountered while employed with a large American county's anti-drug people had completely stopped looking for psychedelics. LSD and 'Shrooms? They're probably not testing for them. They're too busy looking for X and Coke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thats really sad if you think about it....
I am a lab tech and I recently had to take a drug test pre-employment. But I have never been subject to random testing. When I have HAD to be tested (and its not been that frequently) its always been along side a physical to check my health status. How odd that selling socks reqruires more employer oversight than working in a lab?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. drug testing - one of those freedoms the terrist hate us for...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think I would have to be perpetually high to work at a sock store ...
the only way I think I could handle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps this socks store...
I spotted this sign on a socks store in Hiroshima:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. A lot of people seem to be happy with this type of thing
Little by little we are losing our privacy and people seem to not give a shit. I almost didn't get a job a few years ago because I tested positive for "morphine" :eyes: That's what they told me I was on. I had to explain that a few days before the test I had taken a prescribed Tylenol w/ codeine. I had to go back and re-test.

Now the new "war on drugs" is the "war on tobacco". People are rallying around this new war and have no problem giving up more of their privacy. They are already having tests at some companies that if they find out you used tobacco you are gone. Next it will be alcohol, then trans-fats, then maybe some swabbing to make sure you aren't fucking the wrong person.

In a way the thought of drug screening at a sock company is pretty funny, but all in all I think it is pretty shitty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Completely agree
I am not a tobacco smoker, but lately, I've been siding on their side for most things because they're really getting their freedom to smoke shit on.

It's getting scarier out there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I can completely understand non-smokers not wanting to smell that shit
And I do what I can to make sure I'm not blowing smoke into other people's faces. But the way that smokers are being treated is only the opening of the door to more crap like this. And it's all fun and games until something that they do gets trounced upon.

No one even questions the drug screenings these days. It's pretty well accepted to let companies check and see what you are doing on your private time and they can decide that you don't need a job. So far it is drugs and tobacco. It won't belong before they want to check on your alcohol consumption. THEN I bet some people will wake up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. I used to work for a NPO which required them...
and yet they never got administered because everybody from the Exec. Director to the interns smoked pot. Occasionally, on company time.

Oh the things a board of directors will waste time worrying about rather than the mission of the organization. Of course, they were all too busy to raise funds. (This is centrally-part of a board member's duties.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC