Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N.J. Buddhists fined for buying animals, releasing them into wild.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:00 PM
Original message
N.J. Buddhists fined for buying animals, releasing them into wild.

By The Associated Press
PATERSON - A New York sect of Amitabha Buddhists bought hundreds of eels, frogs and turtles in Chinatown to set them free in the Passaic River, hoping they would not only survive but also realize their karmic potential.

Saving the animals, though, did not do anything for the karma of the state Department of Environmental Protection. DEP pfficials say the Buddhists did not have a permit and may be subject to fines up to $1,000.

Releasing critters into the wild takes a permit - and because of fears of harm being done by nonnative species, New Jersey is reluctant to issue them out for anything beyond stocking fish ponds.

"We're dead-set against it," DEP biologist Mark Boriek told the Herald News of West Paterson for Tuesday's newspapers. "It's even illegal to stock any kind of carp or goldfish in New Jersey in a place with an inlet or outlet."


The DEP said it would try to figure out where the reptiles and amphibians came from to try to guess how they might impact the river, which has been cleaned up in recent years.

Authorities have not found the Buddhist group yet.

But one member, Ann Chin, talked to the Herald News.

She said the idea was not to hurt other species, but to save the animals that were destined for dinner tables.

"When I pass by the fish market, I cry," Chin said. "I tell people: 'Stop killing them.' Then: 'Don't eat them.' Then your heart goes to mercy."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, well, they could easily hurt other species regardless of whether that was the intent or not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. idjits
Seriously, with all of the problems we're having with non-native species in our waterways, this can't be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. As a Buddhist ...
I can appreciate that they had good intentions, but this wasn't a wise idea. Releasing animals into a foreign environment can lead to an ecological disaster, particularly when they number in the hundreds. That's aside from the harm already done to that river by human influence, whether or not efforts have been underway to clean it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC